Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Pelatihan Pencatatan dan Pelaporan Kasus Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan dan Anak di Wilayah Hukum Kabupaten Buton Samsul Samsul; La Gurusi; Waode Novita Ayu Muthmainna; Eko Satria; L.M Ricard Zeldi Putra; Al Hiday Nur; La Asiri
Journal of Community Development Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): April
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/comdev.v5i3.290

Abstract

The numerous legal instruments and various agencies involved in the protection of women and children have not led to a reduction in violence against women and children; rather, the incidence has been increasing annually. The primary reasons for the rise in violence against women and children are the lack of education and awareness regarding human rights, gender equality, and gender-based violence, as well as the insufficient support from communities or social networks closest to the victims. This can result in victims feeling isolated and without a place to report or seek help. The method used in this community service program was training on case recording and reporting of violence against women and children. The result of the training was an increase in participants' knowledge regarding the forms of violence against women and children, the roles and duties of the Village Task Force for the Protection of Women and Children (PPA), as well as the procedure for handling cases of violence against women and children. The success of this program was measured using questionnaires administered before and after the training to assess the participants' knowledge and understanding of case recording and reporting of violence against women and children.
Pengaturan Hukum Jaminan Penanggungan Penahanan oleh Penyidik Polri Berdasarkan Pasal 31 KUHAP (Studi di Polisi Sektor Pasarwajo) La Gurusi
Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 9 No 2 (2025): Desember 2025
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31316/jk.v6i3.4134

Abstract

Abstrak Kitab undang–undang Hukum Acara Pidana pasal 1 butir 21, diterangkan bahwa suatu penahan adalah penempatan tersangka atau terdakwa di tempat tertentu oleh penyidik atau penuntutan umum atau hakim dengan penempatannya, dalam hal dan menurut cara yang diatur dalam undang–undang ini. Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk memahami pengaturan hukum penangguhan penahanan dan untuk memahami angan Hukum bagi penyidik untuk menentukan besarnya uang jaminan dalam menetapkan suatu penangguhan penahanan. Jenis penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian hukum empiris. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa Syarat yang ditentukan, serta karena jabatan penyidik atau penuntut umum atau hakim dalam memberikan jaminan penangguhan penahanan berdasarkan Pasal 31 KUHAP sudah berjalan sesuai dengan prosedur yang berlaku akan tetapi didalam Pasal 31 KUHAP belum dijelaskan secara detail mengenai besarnya nominal uang jaminan penangguhan penahanan yang akan diberikan oleh tersangka dalam memperoleh jaminan penangguhan penahanan dari pihak Penyidik Polri. Sedangkan dasar pertimbangan hukum bagi penyidik Kepolisian Sektor Pasarwajo untuk menentukan besarnya uang jaminan diatur menurut KUHAP pada ketentuan Pasal 31 jo Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 27 Tahun 1983 yang menerangkan mengenai jaminan penangguhan penahanan dalam hal ini atas permintaan tersangka atau terdakwa, penyidik sesuai dengan kewenangannya dapat memberikan jaminan penangguhan penahanan dengan atau tanpa jaminan uang atau jaminan orang. Kata Kunci: Penyidik, Penangguhan Penahanan, Terdakwa, KUHAP Abstract Article 1 point 21 of the Criminal Procedure Code explains that an arrest is the placement of a suspect or defendant in a certain place by an investigator, public prosecutor, or judge with his placement, in the case and according to the method regulated in this law. The purpose of the study is to understand the legal arrangements for the suspension of detention and the legal imagination for investigators to determine the amount of the security deposit in determining a suspension of detention. This type of research uses empirical legal research. The results of the study show that the specified conditions, as well as the position of the investigator, public prosecutor, or judge in providing guarantees for the suspension of detention based on Article 31 of the Criminal Procedure Code, have been carried out in accordance with applicable procedures, but Article 31 of the Criminal Procedure Code does not explain in detail the nominal amount of the bail deposit for the suspension of detention, which will be given by the suspect in obtaining a guarantee of suspension of detention from the police investigator. While the basis for legal considerations for investigators of the Pasarwajo Sector Police to determine the amount of the security deposit is regulated according to the Criminal Procedure Code in the provisions of Article 31 in conjunction with Government Regulation Number 27 of 1983, which explains the guarantee for the suspension of detention in this case at the request of the suspect or defendant, investigators in accordance with their authority can provide guarantees for suspension of detention with or without guarantees of money or guarantees of persons. Keywords: Investigator, Suspension of Detention, Defendant, KUHAP