Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.757
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sriwijaya Law Review Jurnal Yudisial Jurnal Simbur Cahaya Lex Lata: Jurnal Ilmah Ilmu Hukum Abdi: Jurnal Pengabdian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Ius Poenale Karya : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat PESHUM
Meria Utama
Universitas Sriwijaya
Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
KETERBATASAN PERTIMBANGAN PEMBUKTIAN DALAM SENGKETA WANPRESTASI PERJANJIAN PINJAMAN DARING Muhammad Syahri Ramadhan; Meria Utama; Rizha Claudilla Putri
Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 19 No. 1 (2026): OPEN LEGAL POLICY
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v19i1.758

Abstract

This study examines the limitations of judicial reasoning in the evidentiary assessment of a breach of contract dispute involving an online loan agreement in Judgment Number 267/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Bdg. The case arose from a claim brought by PT Satustop Finansial Solusi, as the operator of a peer-to-peer lending platform, together with individual lenders, against a borrower who failed to fulfill the repayment obligations under the loan agreement. The central issue concerns the court’s reasoning, which failed to adequately articulate the legal relationship between the platform operator, the lenders, and the borrower, as well as the evidentiary status of the investment history data and loan statements as electronic evidence. However, the facts established at trial, together with the supporting evidence, including the investment history data, digital transfer records, and the platform’s operational mechanism, clearly indicate the characteristics of an information technology-based transaction. This study critiques the evidentiary process at trial, which continues to rely on conventional documentary evidence without making full use of the electronic discovery (e-discovery) framework to verify metadata, digital traces, and the integrity of electronic data, as mandated by the Electronic Information and Transactions Law and the Financial Services Authority regulations. The findings indicate that the panel of judges’ reasoning was sufficient to conclude that a breach of contract had occurred because the defendant admitted the existence of the principal debt, interest, and penalties and failed to fulfill the repayment obligations. Such admission was corroborated by the loan agreement, transfer records, warning letters, and demand letters. The panel of judges also failed to explain the evidentiary status and probative value of exhibit P-8, consisting of investment history data, and exhibit P-9, consisting of loan statements, as electronic information and/or electronic documents. These limitations do not undermine the evidentiary basis for establishing a breach of contract, but the legal reasoning in the judgment does not fully reflect the characteristics of information technology-based peer-to-peer lending transactions.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA PEMAKAIAN TANAH TANPA IZIN DI KABUPATEN BANYUASIN OLEH DIREKTORAT RESERSE KRIMINAL UMUM KEPOLISIAN DAERAH SUMATERA SELATAN Etika Yuniar; Meria Utama; Nashriana Nashriana
Lex LATA Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): Maret 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/lexl.v6i1.2826

Abstract

Abstrak: Tanah merupakan suatu faktor yang sangat penting dalam kehidupan manusia, sejak lahir manusia membutuhkan tanah untuk berbagai kebutuhan baik untuk keperluan tempat tinggal, usaha pertanian, kegiatan sosial dan lain-lain. Keadaan yang demikian mengakibatkan banyaknya kejahatan maupun pelanggaran terhadap penguasaan tanah. Penelitian ini membahas tentang penegakan hukum yang dilakukan oleh penyidik Unit 3 Subdit II Ditreskrimum Polda Sumsel terkait tindak pidana pemakaian tanah tanpa izin berdasarkan UU Nomor 51 Prp Tahun 1960 di Kabupaten Banyuasin dan kendala yang dihadapi oleh penyidik dalam penegakan hukum tindak pidana pemakaian tanah tanpa izin. Metode Penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis empiris, dengan pendekatan studi kasus (case approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conseptual approach). Dari hasil penelitian bahwa penegakan hukum tindak pidana pemakaian tanah tanpa izin di Kabupaten Banyuasin sebagaimana di atur dalam Pasal 6 UU Nomor 51 Prp Tahun 1960 tidak menimbulkan efek jera, sehingga perlu dilakukan upaya penegakan hukum agar lebih efektif dan efisien di masa yang akan datang.  Kata Kunci: Penegakan hukum;Tindak Pidana Pemakaian Tanah Tanpa Izin
Co-Authors Achmad Romsan Ahmad Idris Akhmad Idris Ardhiansyah Nugraha Ardhiansyah Azhar Azhar Biyes Nurul Biyes Nurul Atika Cynthia Azhara Putri Decri Reza Etika Yuniar Eva Yusmita Hamet Hashemi Henny Yuningsih Herwin Herwin Irsan Irsan Irsan Irsan Irsan Irsan M. Syahri Ramadhan M. Syaifuddin Mariana Mariana Marieska Verawaty Maysam Aboutalebi Najafabadi Muhammad Syahri Ramadhan Nashriana Nashriana Putri, Cynthia Azhara Raesitha Zildjianda Renata Aurellia Alfatiha Ricky Saputra Rizha Claudilla Putri Rizka Nurliyantika Santriana Santriana Santriana Titin Purnama Sella Tuti Indah Sari, Tuti Indah