Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.083
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Jurnal Dedikasi Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan International Journal of Advances in Intelligent Informatics Proceeding of the Electrical Engineering Computer Science and Informatics JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control SINTECH (Science and Information Technology) Journal Jurnal Repositor Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science JHCLS
Yuda Munarko
Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health

Published : 29 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : JHCLS

 1 
Artificial Intelligence and Quality of Composition Verdicts in Indonesia: Lessons from New Zealand Hidayah, Nur Putri; Wicaksono, Galih Wasis; Aditya, Christian Sri Kusuma; Munarko, Yuda
Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/jhcls.v4i1.175

Abstract

The quality of the decision is not only related to the judge's considerations but also its suitability to the composition of the decision so that the resulting decision is not easily overturned at the level of legal action and increases public confidence in the judicial institution. This research aims to analyze the quality of judges' decisions in Indonesia in terms of the composition of the decision texts that have been made. This research uses normative legal research methods, a statutory approach, and a comparative approach. The study results show that decisions are not based on the structure of decisions determined by the Supreme Court. One of the reasons is the minimal use of AI, even though AI can help judges identify which parts of the decision structure are not yet in the decision prepared by the judge and improve them so that it is hoped that it will produce uniformity and decisions that are certain and not easily overturned. Indonesia needs to learn from New Zealand guidelines for using AI at the court and tribunal level. Judges can apply AI, some related to summarizing information and administration.
Co-Authors A.A. Ketut Agung Cahyawan W Abims Fardiansa Aditya Dwi Maryanto Agus Eko Minarno Ahmad Faiz, Ahmad Akbi, Denar Regata Aminuddin Aminuddin Anisah Rahmatul Laily Annisa Annisa Aripa, Laofin Arrie Kurniawardhani Basuki, Setio Chandranegara, Didih Rizki Christian Sri kusuma Aditya, Christian Sri kusuma Dyah Anitia Dyah Hestiningtyas Fachry Abda El Rahman Hanung Adi Nugroho Hardianto Wibowo Hariyady Hariyady Hazmi Cokro Mandiri, Mochammad Ibrahim, Zaidah Izzah, Tsabita Nurul Lailatul Husniah Maskur Maskur Maulina Balqis Muhammad Athaillah Noor Aini Mohd Roslan Norizan Mat Diah Nur Hayatin Nur Putri Hidayah Rahma Ningsih Rendiyono Wahyu Saputro Ruhaila Maskat Sasongko Yoni Bagas Sumadi, Fauzi Dwi Setiawan Susi Ekawati Vicky Novreza Wahyu Andhyka Kusuma Wicaksono, Galih Wasis Widya Rizka Ulul Fadilah Wildan Suharso Yufis Azhar Zaidah Ibrahim Zaidah Ibrahim