Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Determinasi Pengaruh Keputusan Investasi Saham dengan Perilaku Keuangan Sebagai Variabel Moderasi Faradisa, Assyfa; Maslichah, Maslichah; Fakhriyyah, Dewi Diah
e_Jurnal Ilmiah Riset Akuntansi Vol 15, No 01 (2026): e_Jurnal Ilmiah Riset Akuntansi
Publisher : Universitas Islam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The research was done on purpose to help analyzing the influence of financial technology, financial literacy, and also risk perception on decisions of stock investment and also financial behavior acts as a moderating variable of those student members of the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) Investment Gallery in Malang City. The background is the increasing participation of young investors that has not been fully accompanied by the quality of rational investment decision-making. This study applied such a quantitative approach by applying primary data taken through questionnaires from 106 respondents taken by purposive sampling technique. Data were analyzed by applying SEM–PLS method. The outcomes indicate that financial technology, financial literacy, and also risk perception give such a positive influence toward stock investment decisions, as does financial behavior. However, in its role as a moderating variable, financial behavior weakens the influence of these three variables on investment decisions. These findings support Behavioral Finance Theory and Planned Behavior Theory, help in emphasizing that decisions of students’ investment are made by an interaction of technological factors, financial understanding, and rational behavioral control.Keywords: Stock investment decision, financial technology, financial literacy, risk perception, financial behavior, SEM-PLS.
Fraud Risk Assessment: Effects of Bias, Skepticism, and Complexity with Whistleblowing Climate as Moderator Gusti Muhammad Rizal; Dewi Diah Fakhriyyah; Afifudin
Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan Vol. 16 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/jrak.v16i1.42748

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to examine the effects of unconscious bias, professional skepticism, and audit complexity on fraud risk assessment quality, and to evaluate the moderating role of whistleblowing climate within organizational audit settings. Methodology/approach: A quantitative approach using Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was applied to data collected from 70 internal auditors working in manufacturing firms in Gresik, Indonesia. The analysis included assessment of the measurement model and hypothesis testing for both direct and moderating effects. Findings: Results show that professional skepticism significantly improves the quality of fraud risk assessment. Conversely, unconscious bias and audit complexity have negative but statistically insignificant effects. Whistleblowing climate significantly moderates and enhances the influence of professional skepticism but does not moderate the effects of unconscious bias or audit complexity. Practical implications: Organizations should reinforce professional skepticism through structured training and strengthen ethical infrastructures, particularly whistleblowing systems, to support auditor judgment in fraud detection. Originality/value: This study integrates behavioral auditor factors with ethical organizational context, offering new empirical evidence on how whistleblowing climate interacts with auditor characteristics in shaping fraud risk assessment quality.