Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.33
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustisia Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Arena Hukum Jurnal Hukum Novelty Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Konstitusi PETITA: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Syariah (PJKIHdS) Constitutional Review Lex Scientia Law Review Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Jurnal Konstitusi Human Rights in The Global South (HRGS) Pandecta : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Research Law Journal)
Muchamad Ali Safaat
Universitas Brawijaya
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 28 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Welfare Detection and Legal Effectiveness: Country Institutions Which the Authority is Regulated in Law in the Disputes of Authority Demas Brian W; Sudarsono Sudarsono; Rachmad Safa’at; Muchamad Ali Safa’at
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Vol 3, No 1 (2020): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute February
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v3i1.739

Abstract

Institutional design of the state with separation of powers and checks and balance give birth to the intersection of authority. This condition has the potential to create a power dispute between state institutions. Provisions regarding the resolution of disputes over state institutions are inseparable from issues concerning subjectum and objectum litis which have become jurisprudential and the institution is independent and is not subordinate to other institutions, so there are several state institutions that cannot resolve disputes in the Constitutional Court, namely state institutions that regulate them outside the Constitution, whether regulated by law or under the law. The purpose of this study is to describe the provisions of dispute resolution for the authority of state agencies which the authority is regulated in law. This journal research uses a qualitative paradigm with a phenomenological approach in the translation. The results obtained in this study are: 1) Detection of  Welfare which will be realized in maximum when all state agencies effective in operation; 2) Paradigm: Analysis of Dispute Authority of State Institutions. On the basis of a modern legal state, disputes over the authority of state institutions that are formed based on the law, need to be channeled to settle so that they remain based on due process of law and there are no rules in the process of resolving disputes over the authority of state institutions in the law.
Co-Authors A.A. Ketut Agung Cahyawan W Aan Eko Widiarto Agnes Harvelian Aritonang, Syofina Dwi Putri Demas Brian W Dhia Al Uyun, Dhia Fadli, Moh. Faisyah, Nur Fajar Laksono Fajar Laksono Suroso Fajar Laksono Suroso, Fajar Laksono I Dewa Gde Mayun Permana I Nyoman Nurjaya Indah Dwi Qurbani Mardian Wibowo Milda Istiqomah Muhammad Nur Ngesti Dwi Prasetyo Nurul Aprianti Rachmad Safa’at Rahmat, Al Fauzi Rahmatika, Nur Auliya Riana Susmayanti Shinta Hadiyantina Sholahuddin Al-Fatih Sudarsono Sudarsono Tunggul Ansari Setia Negara Uyun, Dhia Al