Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.909
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Journal of Environment and Management Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Journal of Innovative and Creativity Palangka Law Review Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pengabdian Masyarakat International Proceeding On Religion, Culture, Law, Education, And Hindu Studies
Thea Farina
Universitas Palangka Raya
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Perlindungan Konsumen dalam Transaksi Pemesana Hotel Melalui Platform Digital: Analisis Normatif terhadap Kasus Penolakan Layanan oleh Pihak Hotel Indonesia Pekalongan Joshua Walker Siregar; Thea Farina; Nuraliah Ali; Joanita Jalianery
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 4 (2026): Tema Hukum Perdata dan Kenotariatan
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i4.3051

Abstract

This study aims to analyze consumer protection in hotel booking transactions through digital platforms, focusing on a service refusal case involving a hotel in Pekalongan, Indonesia. The research uses a normative approach by examining relevant regulations, including the Consumer Protection Act and provisions governing the rights and obligations of consumers and business actors in digital transactions. The findings show that hotels must act in good faith, provide honest, proper and non-discriminatory services and deliver accurate information. Both the hotel and Traveloka are responsible for consumer losses through full refunds. This study contributes to developing more effective consumer protection policies.
Tinjauan Yuridis Disharmoni Perlindungan Hukum Antara Hak Cipta dan Hak Merek terhadap Objek yang Sama: Studi Putusan Nomor 40/Pdt.Sus-Hak Cipta/2024/Pn.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. Alda Paramita Azhara; Thea Farina; Elin Sudiarti; Nuraliah Ali
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 4 (2026): Tema Hukum Perdata dan Kenotariatan
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i4.3078

Abstract

Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) protection in Indonesia, as regulated in Law No. 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright and Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications, is a fundamental basis in ensuring legal certainty for creators and business actors. However, in reality, legal disharmony often occurs when an object has a dual function as both a work of art and a commercial distinguishing mark (trademark). This normative conflict is triggered by a conflict of registration principles, namely the declarative principle of copyright versus the constitutive principle (first-to-file) of trademark rights, which often leads to overlapping protection claims. This study aims to analyze the resolution of legal disharmony between copyright and trademark rights over the same object by referring to Decision Number 40/Pdt.Sus-Hak Cipta/2024/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. The research method used is normative juridical with a statute approach and a case approach. The results of the analysis show that the Panel of Judges resolved the disharmony by applying the originality test as a benchmark. The findings of the study confirm that when an object has been registered and used as a trademark first, the subsequent registration of that object as copyright is considered to not meet the criteria of originality. Harmonization of protection can be achieved through the synchronization of originality testing.
Co-Authors Ade Puspa Anggraini Aditya Chandra Saputra Alda Paramita Azhara Alfi Khaerah Ariani Yestati Claudia Yuni Pramita Elin Sudiarti Gusti Ramadhan Habibah Habibah Heria Mariaty Ivans Januardy Joanita Jalianery Joshua Walker Siregar Kiki Kristanto Mardan Umar Mulida Hayati Nuraliah Ali Paulus Bundong Pebri Agung Rizki Setyobowo Sangalang Robie Saputro Ronaldi Sulang Sangking Vindira Edka Juniar Yulius Don Pratama