Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.745
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Arena Hukum Diponegoro Law Review Unes Law Review BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan Media Iuris Notaire Jurist-Diction LEGAL BRIEF Jurnal Pertanahan Yuridika Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Jurnal Pertanahan
Agus Sekarmadji
Faculty Of Law, Airlangga University
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Earth & Planetary Sciences Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

 1   2 
PEROMBAKAN PEMILIKAN TANAH UNTUK RUMAH TINGGAL MELALUI SINKRONISASI DATA ELEKTRONIK ANTAR INSTANSI Moechthar, Oemar; Sekarmadji, Agus
Jurnal Pertanahan Vol 10 No 1 (2020): Jurnal Pertanahan
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53686/jp.v10i1.28

Abstract

Terbitnya UUPA 60 Tahun yang lalu, belum menjamin perwujudan tujuan dari peraturan tersebut yakni dapat memberikemungkinan akan tercapainya, fungsi bumi, air dan ruang angkasa, yang sesuai dengan kepentingan rakyat Indonesia.Pendapat ini dapat dilihat dari masih banyaknya rakyat Indonesia yang belum memiliki tanah untuk rumah tinggal sebagaikebutuhan primer setelah kebutuhan pangan. Jumlah tanah di Indonesia tidak diimbangi dengan jumlah penduduk, olehkarena itu perlu dilakukan pemerataan penguasaan tanah agar tidak timbul penguasaan tanah yang melebihi batas maksimumbagi golongan tertentu. Sebagaimana diketahui bahwa pemerintah pernah menerbitkan Kepmen Agraria/Kepala BPN Nomor6 Tahun 1998 tentang Pemberian Hak Milik Atas Tanah Untuk Rumah Tinggal, yang mana dalam aturan tersebut disebutkanbahwa seseorang tidak boleh memiliki lebih dari 5 bidang tanah dengan status hak milik yang seluruhnya meliputi luaslebih dari 5.000 m2, namun praktek di lapangan seseorang dapat memiliki hak milik lebih dari batas yang telah ditetapkan.Kelemahan dalam aturan itu tidak memberikan sanksi apabila ketentuan tersebut dilanggar, dengan demikian banyak oknumyang memanfaatkan kekosongan norma dalam aturan tersebut demi kepentingan pribadi. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalamtulisan ini adalah pendekatan undang-undang, pendekatan sosio legal dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil akhir adalah menemukanmodel pengawasan dan perombakan kembali penguasaan tanah hak milik. Dengan adanya model tersebut maka tujuanpasal 33 ayat (3) Konstitusi Indonesia yaitu meningkatkan kesejahteraan warga negara Indonesia dapat dioptimalkan.
Reconsidering Priority Rights in the Reacquisition of Land Rules in Indonesia : A Legal Analysis Post-Termination of Right to Cultivate, Right to Build, and Right to Use Moechthar, Oemar; Sekarmadji, Agus; Hidayat, Yogi; Anand, Ghansham
BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): Bhumi: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31292/bhumi.v11i2.833

Abstract

Abstract: Land is a fundamental resource for fulfilling social and economic needs. In Indonesia, the expiration of limited land rights, namely the Right to Cultivate, Right to Build, and Right to Use, raises complex legal issues concerning both the legal status of the land and the position of former right holders. Government Regulation No. 18 of 2021 introduces the concept of “priority rights,” granting former holders the opportunity to reapply for rights over the same land. However, the regulation fails to stipulate a clear time limit or legal duration for exercising such priority. This regulatory gap has generated legal ambiguity, inconsistent interpretation, and recurring land disputes, thereby weakening legal certainty in Indonesian land governance. This study aims to analyze the normative foundation, legal implications, and temporal scope of priority rights in the context of post-expiration land tenure. The research employs a doctrinal legal method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Legal materials are obtained through library research and analyzed using grammatical, systematic, and teleological interpretation to assess the validity, coherence, and effectiveness of the existing regulatory framework governing priority rights. The findings indicate that the absence of a definitive legal time frame for exercising priority rights creates a rechtsvacuum (legal vacuum), which not only undermines legal certainty but also exacerbates conflicts over land that has reverted to state control. Although the land formally returns to the state upon the expiration of the original rights, former holders retain a form of civil legal interest derived from their previous lawful tenure, which serves as a valid basis for prioritization. Keywords: Land Rights, Priority Rights, Expiration of Tenure, Legal Certainty.
The Regulation of Land Ownership Rights for Legal Entities in the Perspective of Modern Agrarian Law: Challenges of Fair Legal Evolution Alen Saputra; Agus Yudha Hernoko; Agus Sekarmadji
Yuridika Vol. 41 No. 1 (2026): Volume 41 No 1, January 2026
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v41i1.75227

Abstract

Land ownership is a legally recognized right that represents the strongest and most comprehensive form of control over land. Within Indonesia’s agrarian legal system, land ownership rights are fundamentally granted only to Indonesian citizens. However, in practice, certain exceptions allow legal entities to obtain land ownership rights based on Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Principles and Government Regulation Number 38 of 1963 concerning the Designation of Legal Entities Eligible to Hold Land Ownership Rights. These provisions have sparked theoretical and philosophical debates as legal entities do not possess descendants, while land ownership is inherently hereditary. This paper examines the philosophical foundation from a normative juridical perspective regarding the granting of land ownership rights to specific legal entities, as well as the urgency of regulatory reform to ensure legal certainty and to accommodate the evolving legal and societal needs within the framework of modernization.
FAST TRACK LEGISLATION WITHOUT A LEGAL TRACK: A COMPARATIVE CRITIQUE OF ACCELERATED LAW-MAKING IN INDONESIA AND OTHER JURISDICTIONS Kaharuddin, Kaharuddin; Moechthar, Oemar; Sekarmadji, Agus; Karunia, Dinar; Kristianti, Dwi Rahayu; Widianti, Ekawestri Prajwalita; Katherina, Ave Maria Frisa; Hidayat, Yogi
Diponegoro Law Review Vol 10, No 2 (2025): Diponegoro Law Review October 2025 (in progress)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/dilrev.10.2.2025.199-216

Abstract

This study critically examines the trend of "fast-track legislation" in Indonesia, particularly focusing on the Omnibus Law on Job Creation, the IKN Law, and the 2024 Constitutional Court Law. While fast-track legislation is often used as a tool for crisis management, Indonesia’s approach raises significant concerns due to its lack of a formal procedural framework. Unlike mature democracies such as the United Kingdom, the United States, and New Zealand, which have regulated systems for expedited law-making, Indonesia’s fast-track process is largely unregulated and accelerates policy changes without proper public scrutiny. The study uncovers a troubling pattern where speed becomes a substitute for thorough deliberation, leading to a democratic deficit and allowing executive power to bypass essential checks and balances. By comparing Indonesia’s practices with those of established democracies, the research highlights that fast-track mechanisms can be effective when guided by clear legal standards, judicial review, and transparency. However, Indonesia’s current system risks undermining democratic accountability, as urgency is often used as a tool to avoid public participation and scrutiny. The article concludes by calling for the urgent codification of a transparent, participatory framework for expedited legislation within Indonesia’s existing legal structures. This framework should define criteria for urgency, ensure procedural safeguards, and prioritize public involvement, ultimately ensuring that the pursuit of speed does not come at the cost of democratic integrity.
A Juridical Study of Granting Wills to Heirs in the Perspective of Islamic Inheritance Law Moechthar, Oemar; Sekarmadji, Agus; Katherina, Ave Maria Frisa
Yuridika Vol. 37 No. 3 (2022): Volume 37 No 3 September 2022
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v37i3.41161

Abstract

This paper is intended to criticize the societal practices that occur, especially in Indonesia, where many heirs during their lifetime give wills to heirs who have been given a particular part in the Qur'an, which results in other (experts) heirs not getting a share or obtaining. Less than that specified in the Qur'an. One of the contributing factors is because, according to the heir, the provision of the will is to provide justice for all his heirs; however, fairness according to the heir is different from justice in the distribution of inheritance according to the Al-Qur'an and Hadith. Legal research uses this case approach as the primary analysis juxtaposed with the statutory approach and the conceptual approach as the 'knife' of analysis. The thesis or argument obtained is related to aspects of Islamic law; it is not appropriate for the heir to give a will to someone who is an heir whose part has been assigned in the Al-Quran and Hadith.
Co-Authors Agus Yudha Hernoko Alen Saputra Bagas Hega Samudra Dewi Liesnoor Setyowati Diyan Ricky Warisle Dwi Rahayu Kristianti Ellyne Dwi Poespasari Faizal Kurniawan Ghansham Anand Hidayat, Yogi Kaharuddin Karunia, Dinar Katherina, Ave Maria Frisa Oemar Mochtar Oemar Moechthar Pitriani, Winda Ravina Moselle Siringoringo, Gracia Sampe, John Roberto Soelistyowati Sri Hajati Sri Winarsi Urip Santoso Widianti, Ekawestri Prajwalita