Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika
Budiyono Budiyono
Prodi Magister Pendidikan Matematika, Pascasarjana, FKIP – UNS
Education Mathematics

Published : 45 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 45 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL LEARNING CYCLE 7E DENGAN PROBLEM POSING PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN MESUJI LAMPUNG Agus Setiawan; Budiyono Budiyono; Imam Sujadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was investigate the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the mathematics learning Creativities. This research used the quasi experimental research with the factorial design of 3 x 3. Its population was all of the students in Grade VIII of State Junior Secondary Schools of Mesuji regency. The samples were State Junior Secondary School 1 of East Mesuji, State Junior Secondary School 1 of Way Serdang and State Junior Secondary School 1 of Simpang Pematang The instruments used to gather the data of the research were test of learning achievement in Mathematics and questionnaire of Mathematics learning creativity of the students The proposed hypotheses of the research were tested by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research are as follows: 1) The students instructed with the Learning Cycle 7E model with the problem posing have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those instructed with the Learning Cycle 7E model and the direct learning model. In addition, the students instructed with the Learning Cycle 7E model have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those instructed with the direct learning model. 2) The students with the high Mathematics learning creativity have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the moderate and low Mathematics learning creativities, and the students with the moderate Mathematics learning creativity have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low Mathematics learning creativity. 3) In the Learning Cycle 7E model with problem-posing, the Learning Cycle 7E model, and the direct learning model, the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the high Mathematics learning creativity is better than those of the students with the moderate and low Mathematics learning creativities. And the learning achievement of the students with the moderate Mathematics learning creativity is better than that of the students with the low Mathematics learning creativity. 4) In the high, moderate, and low Mathematics learning creativities, the students instructed with the Learning Cycle 7E model with problem-posing have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those instructed with the Learning Cycle 7E model and the direct learning model, and the students instructed with the Learning Cycle 7E model have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those instructed with the direct learning model.Keywords: Learning Cycle 7E, problem posing, and Mathematics learning creativity  
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SCIENTIFIC PADA MATERI FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR Hendry Putra; Budiyono Budiyono; Dewi Retno Sari S
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of learning model (LM) toward learning outcomes (LO) in mathematics viewed from the learning styles (LS). The learning models of this research were cooperative LM of the NHT with Scientific, the cooperative LM of the TPS with Scientific, and the classical learning with Scientific. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 3 x 3. Its population was all of the students in Grade VIII of State Junior Secondary Schools of Karanganyar. The instruments used to gather the data were test of LO in Mathematics and questionnaire of LS. The proposed hypotheses of the research were tested by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows: 1) the students instructed NHT had a better LO in Mathematics than those instructed TPS and those instructed the classical learning. Furthermore, the students instructed TPS had a better LO in Mathematics than those instructed the classical learning. 2) the LO in Mathematics of the students with the auditory LS was better than that of the students with the visual LS and that of the students with the kinesthetic LS. In addition, the LO in Mathematics of the students with the visual LS was better than that of the students with the kinesthetic LS. 3) on model of the NHT, the students with the visual LS had the same LO in Mathematics as the students with the auditory LS. Moreover, the students with the visual and auditory LS had a better LO in Mathematics than those the students with the kinesthetic LS. On model of the TPS and the classical learning results in the same LO in each of LS. 4) the students with the visual and auditory LS, NHT and the classical learning results in the same LO in Mathematics as TPS. Furthermore, NHT results in a better LO in Mathematics than the classical learning. The students with the kinesthetic LS had the same LO in each of LM.Keywords: NHT with Scientific, TPS with Scientific, learning outcomes, learning styles.
EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN SAVI DAN RECIPROCAL TEACHING PADA MATERI OPERASI HITUNG BENTUK ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN SLEMAN Mahmudah Titi Muanifah; Budiyono Budiyono; Sri Subanti
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The objective of research was to find out: (1) which students had the better mathematics learning achievement, those treated with SAVI, those with Reciprocal teaching or those with direct learning model in the topics of algebraic arithmetic operation l, (2) which students had the better mathematics learning achievement, those with visual, those with auditory or those with kinesthetic learning style, (3) in each learning model, which students had the better mathematics learning achievement, those with visual, those with auditory or those with kinesthetic learning style, and (4) in each learning style, which students had the better mathematics learning achievement, those treated with SAVI, those with Reciprocal teaching or those with direct learning model in the topics of algebraic arithmetic operation.This study was a quasi experimental research with a 3 × 3 factorial design. The population of research was all of the VII graders of Junior High Schools in Sleman Regency. The sample was taken using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The sample consisted of 285 students: 96 for the experiment 1 class, 94 for the experiment 2 class, and 95 for the control class. Considering the hypothesis testing, the following conclusions could be drawn. (1) The learning achievement of the students treated with SAVI learning model, Reciprocal Teaching learning model and direct learning model was equally good. (2) The learning achievement of the students with visual learning style was better than that of those with kinesthetic one. But, that of those with visual learning style was as good as that of those with auditory one, and that of those with auditory was as good as that of those with kinesthetic one. (3) In SAVI, reciprocal teaching, and direct learning models, the learning achievement of the students with visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles was equally good. (4) In the categories of visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning style, the learning achievement of the students treated with SAVI, reciprocal teaching and direct learning was equally good. Keywords: Somatic, Auditory, Visual and Intellectual (SAVI), Reciprocal Teaching (RT), Student Learning Style.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TAI BERBASIS AFL PADA PERSAMAAN GARIS LURUS DITINJAU DARI SIKAP SISWA TERHADAP MATEMATIKA Adi Nurcahyo; Budiyono Budiyono; Budi Usodo
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 1 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v6i1.10034

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from student attitude toward mathematics. The learning models compared were Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) based Assessment for Learning (AfL), TAI, and conventional learning model. The research was quasi experimental. The population of this research was all students of grade VIII State Junior High School of the District Karanganyar, academic year 2013/2014. The samples in this research were SMPN 1 Tasikmadu, SMPN 2 Jaten, and SMPN 2 Colomadu taken by stratified cluster random sampling. Instruments used to collect data were mathematics achievement instrument test and questionnaires students toward mathematics instrument. Data analysis technique used hypothesis test with two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. From the results of the analysis, can be concluded that: 1) the learning achievement in mathematics of the students who were learning mathematics with cooperative learning model TAI Based AfL were better than the ones who were learning mathematics with cooperative learning model TAI and conventional learning model, however the students who were learning mathematics with cooperative learning model TAI were better than the ones who were learning mathematics with conventional learning model, 2) the learning achievement in mathematics of the students with the high attitude toward mathematics were better than the ones with the medium and low attitude toward mathematics, however the students with the medium  attitude toward mathematics were better  than the ones with the low attitude toward mathematics, 3) in the cooperative learning model TAI Based AfL, the learning achievement in mathematics of the students with ones who have the high attitude toward mathematics were better than the students with the low attitude toward mathematics, and students with the medium attitude toward mathematics were as good as the ones who have low attitude toward mathematics as well. In the cooperative learning model TAI and conventional learning model, the students with the high, medium, and low attitude toward mathematics had the same achievement in learning mathematics, 4) in the students with the high attitude toward mathematics, the learning achievement of the students who were learning mathematics with ones who have cooperative learning model TAI Based AfL were better than the students were learning mathematics with cooperative learning model TAI, the students who were learning mathematics with cooperative learning model TAI had the same achievement in learning mathematics with conventional learning model, and the students who were learning mathematics with cooperative learning model TAI Based AfL had the same achievement in learning mathematics with cooperative learning model TAI. The students with the medium and low attitude toward mathematics had the same achievement in learning mathematics among the ones who were given the cooperative learning model TAI Based AfL, TAI, and conventional learning model.Keywords: Team Assisted Individualization (TAI), Assessment for learning (AfL), students attitude toward mathematics, achievement learning mathematics.
PENGEMBANGAN MODUL PEMBELAJARAN DENGAN PENDEKATAN DISCOVERY LEARNING PADA MATERI LIMIT FUNGSI ALJABAR KELAS X DI SMA INSAN CENDEKIA SUKOHARJO TAHUN AJARAN 2015/2016 Setyati Puji Wulandari; Budiyono Budiyono; Isnandar Slamet
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v7i1.20236

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research were to: 1) determine the validity of the results of the development of learning modules with discovery learning approach on the material of limit algebra functions; 2) determine the practicality of the development of learning modules; 3) determine the effectiveness of the development of learning modules; 4) determine whether students achievement in the material of limit algebra functions using learning modules is better than the students who don’t use it. The development of the modules was done through the modified Four D, namely define, design, development, and disseminate. Data were analyzed using descriptive analysis. Validity analysis was based on an expert assessment. Practicality analysis was based on implementation of learning module. Effectiveness analysis was based on student response after using the module. Analysis of student achievement was based on t-test hypothesis. The result concluded that: 1) learning modules with discovery learning approach to the material limit algebra functions declared fit for use by experts with the validity score of 3.44 and be in very good criteria; 2) learning modules expressed practical use in learning with the practicality score gained from the sheet of implementation of learning is 0.919 and be in very good criteria; 3) learning modules is effective for use in learning with the scores of effectiveness obtained from the sheet of student's response to the module is 3.03 and be in good criteria; 4) learning achievement of students who use the learning module is better than students who don’t use it, but isn’t significant.Keywords: learning module, discovery learning, limit algebra functions.
Co-Authors Achmad Nurrofiq Adi Nurcahyo Agus Setiawan Ajeng Novalin Wija Pratiwi Alfonsa Maria Sofia Hapsari Apri Winar Cahyani Arie Purwa Kusuma Arief Kristyawan Budi Usodo Dewi Retno Sari S Dewi Retno Sari Saputro Eva Tri Wahyuni Fitri Era Sugesti Gatut Iswahyudi Habibi Ratu Perwira Negara Hendry Putra Heni Septi Rahayu Imam Sujadi Isnandar Slamet Khafittulloh Viqriah Kiki Riska Ayu Kurniawati, Kiki Riska Ayu Kurnia Awalia Lenny Puspita Dewi Lia Ariati Mahmudah Titi Muanifah Mardodo Mardodo Miftachudin Miftachudin Nanda Noor Fadjrin Nurina Kurniasari Rahmawati Nurrahmawati Nurrahmawati Octarina Hidayatus Sholikhah Putra Adi Wibowo Ratih Kusumaningrum Retna Ayuningrum Rina Mahmudati Riyadi Riyadi Septi Wulandari Setyati Puji Wulandari Shanti Indah Lestari Sholeh Muntasyir Sri Subanti Suci Irawati Supriyanti Supriyanti Swasti Maharani Umi Supraptinah Venty Meilasari Veronica Sri Wigiyanti Virlina Zuhanisani Wihasti Imas Priyandani Yudi Pramono Pawiro Zuhdha Basofi Nugroho