Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK-PAIR-SHARE (TPS) DAN LEARNING CYCLE 5E (LC 5E) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DITINJAU DARI TIPE KEPRIBADIAN SISWA Rina Mahmudati; Budiyono Budiyono; Sri Subanti
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on learning achievement viewed from the personality type of the students. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning model of the TPS, LC 5E, and the classical learning model with scientific approach. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test on the topic of function and questionnaire of personality type. The data was analyzed by using two way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) The mathematic learning achievement of students treated with TPS learning model was as good as that of those treated with LC 5E model, and that of those treated with TPS learning model was as good as that of those treated with classical learning model with scientific approach, and that of those treated with LC 5E model was better than that of those treated with classical learning model with scientific approach; (2) The mathematic learning achievement of students with sanguine personality was better than that of those with melancholic one but was as good as that of those with choleric and phlegmatic personalities, that of those with choleric personality was better than that of those with melancholic one, and that of those with melancholic personality was as good as that of those with phlegmatic, and that of those with choleric personality was as good as that of those with phlegmatic one; (3) In each type of student personality, it could be found that the students treated with Think-Pair-Share had equally good learning achievement to those treated with LC 5E model, the students treated with TPS had equally good learning achievement to those treated with classical learning model with scientific approach, those treated with LC 5E model had better learning achievement than those treated with classical learning model with scientific approach; and (4) In each type of learning models, it could be found that the learning achievement of students with sanguine personality was better than that of those with melancholic one but was as good as that of those with choleric and phlegmatic personalities, that of those with choleric personality was better than that of those with melancholic one, and that of those with melancholic personality was as good as that of those with phlegmatic, and that of those with choleric personality was as good as that of those with phlegmatic one.Keywords: Learning Cycle 5E, Think-Pair-Share, Classical with scientific approach, personality type

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER (NHT) DENGAN ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING (AfL) MELALUI PENILAIAN TEMAN SEJAWAT PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN GARIS DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA MTsN DI KABUPATEN SRAGEN Sholeh Muntasyir; Budiyono Budiyono; Budi Usodo
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: This research is aimed to view: (1) which gives a better learning achievement, learning Numbered Head Together (NHT) with the AfL through peer assessment, NHT or direct learning, (2) which gives better achievement, low, medium or high level creativity in mathematics learning, (3) which has better mathematics learning achievement, student having low, medium or high learning creativity on each learning model, (4) which learning model gives better achievement in learning mathematics, learning model Numbered Head Together (NHT) with the AfL through peer assessment, learning models Numbered Head Together (NHT) or direct learning model on each student’s creativity level. This research was a quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The study population was all students MTsN in Sragen. The sampling technique used a stratified cluster random sampling. The samples were 294 students, consisted of 95 students in the first experimental class, 100 students in the second experimental class and 99 students in the control class. Data collected through mathematics achievement tests and questionnaires of study mathematics creativity. Hypothesis testing used two- way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results show as follows. (1) The NHT with the AfL through peer assessment model provide a better learning performance than the NHT and direct learning model. The NHT model provide a better learning performance than the direct learning model. (2) Students with a high level learning creativity have a better achievement than students who have medium and low creativity. Students with medium and low level creativity gain the same learning achievement. (3) In the NHT learning model with the AfL through peer assessment, students with a high level creativity gain better learning achievement than students with medium learning creativity, but when compared with students who have low learning creativity get the same academic achievement. While using NHT model and direct learning, students with high, medium and low creativity get the same learning achievement. (4) At the high level of creativity, NHT with the AfL through peer assessment model gived a better performance than the NHT and direct learning, NHT and direct learning models provide the same learning performance. Students having medium and low level of creativity provide the same learning achievement in each learning models.Keywords : NHT, AfL, peer assessment, creativity in learning.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM-ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DAN TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENTS (TGT) PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN SPASIAL SISWA KELAS VIII MTs NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN NGAWI Lilia Sinta Wahyuniar; Budiyono Budiyono; Dewi Retno Sari S
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: The objectives of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the spatial ability of the students. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning model of the TAI type, the cooperative learning model of the TGT type, and the direct learning model. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 3 x 3. Its population was all of the students in Grade VIII of Islamic State Junior Secondary Schools of Ngawi regency. The samples of the research consisted of 336 students from Islamic State Junior Secondary School of Paron, Islamic State Junior Secondary School of Ngawi, and Islamic State Junior Secondary School of Geneng. They were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments to gather the data of the research were test of learning achievement in Mathematics and test of spatial ability. The proposed hypotheses of the research were tested by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows. 1) The cooperative learning model of the TAI type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the cooperative learning model of the TGT type and the direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of the TGT type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the direct learning model. 2) The learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the high spatial ability was better than that of the students with the moderate and low spatial abilities, and the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the moderate spatial ability was better than that of the students with the low spatial ability. 3) There was an interaction the aforementioned learning models and the categories of the spatial ability on the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students.Keywords: TAI, TGT, and spatial ability.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STRUCTURED NUMBERED HEADS (SNH) DAN TWO STAY TWO STRAY (TSTS) PADA PEMAHAMAN KONSEP DAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI SURAKARTA DITINJAU DARI KECEMASAN SISWA PADA MATERI POKOK BANGUN DATAR Alfonsa Maria Sofia Hapsari; Budiyono Budiyono; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: This research aims at determining the effect of learning models on conceptual understanding and problem-solving viewed from the anxiety on mathematics. The learning models compared were TSTS, SNH, and direct instruction. This research used the quasi experimental research method. The proposed hypotheses of research were tested by using the two-way multivariate variance analysis with unbalanced cells. The results of research are as follows: 1) the cooperative learning model of the TSTS type gives a better conceptual understanding and problem solving than the cooperative learning model of the SNH type and the direct learning model, but both the cooperative learning model of the SNH type and the direct learning model give the same good conceptual understanding and problem solving; (2) the students with the low anxiety level on Mathematics have a better conceptual understanding and problem solving than those with the moderate anxiety level on Mathematics, and those with high anxiety level on Mathematics, and the students with the moderate anxiety level on Mathematics have a better conceptual understanding and problem solving than those with the high anxiety level on Mathematics; (3) in the direct learning model, the students with the low anxiety on Mathematics have a better conceptual understanding and problem solving than those with the moderate anxiety level on Mathematics and those with the high anxiety level on Mathematics, but in the cooperative learning model of the SNH type and the cooperative learning model of the TSTS type, all of the groups of the students have the same good conceptual understanding and problem solving; and (4) in each anxiety level, the three learning models give the same good conceptual understanding and problem solving.Keywords: SNH, TSTS, problem solving, conceptual understanding

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DISERTAI DENGAN STRATEGI PETA KONSEP PADA MATERI BILANGAN DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI SE-KOTA METRO TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015 Wihasti Imas Priyandani; Budiyono Budiyono; Sri Subanti
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: This research aimed to know: (1) which one of the learning models gave a better achievement between TPS concept maps, TPS, or clasical, (2) which one of the students with types of learning style had a better achievement between students with visual, auditory, or kinesthetic, (3) at each learning style types, which one of the learning models gave a better achievement between TPS concept maps, TPS, or clasical, (4) at each the learning models, which one of the students with types of learning style had a better achievement between students with visual, auditory, or kinesthetic. The population of the research was the eighth class students of Junior High School at Metro regency on academic year 2013/2014 and the sample was students from SMP Negeri 2 Metro, SMP Negeri 6 Metro and SMP Negeri 5 Metro which was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. This was a quasi-experimental research with a 3x3 factorial design. The data analysis technique used was unbalanced two ways analysis of variance. Based on the data analysis, it was concluded as follows. 1) TPS concept maps gave the same achievement as TPS and clasical, 2) The students with auditory had better achievement than the students with visual and kinesthetic, the students with visual gave the same achievement as students with kinesthetic, 3) In TPS concept maps, the students with visual gave the same achievement as students with auditory, the students with visual gave the same achievement as students with kinesthetic, and the students with auditory had better achievement than the students with kinesthetic. In TPS, the students with auditory had better achievement than the students with visual, the students with auditory had better achievement than the students with kinesthetic, the students with visual had better achievement than the students with kinesthetic. In clasical model, the students with visual had the same achievement as the students with auditory and kinesthetic. 4) At the students with visual, auditory, and kinesthetic. TPS concept maps gave the same achievement as TPS and clasical.Keywords: TPS concept maps, TPS, Learning Style,

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TWO STAY TWO STRAY (TSTS), NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT), DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) PADA MATERI LINGKARAN DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO Ratih Kusumaningrum; Budiyono Budiyono; Sri Subanti
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: The objective of research was to find out the effect of Two Stay To Stray (TSTS), Numbered Heads Together (NHT), and Think Pair Share (TPS) types of cooperative learning model on the student learning achievement viewed from mathematics learning creativity. This study was a quasi experimental research with a 3 x 3 factorial design. The population of research was all of the 8th graders of Junior High Schools in Sukoharjo Regency. The sample was taken using stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments used for collecting data were mathematics learning achievement test and mathematics learning creativity questionnaire. Considering the hypothesis testing, the following conclusions could be drawn. 1) TSTS learning model provide better learning achievement then NHT and TPS learning model did, and NHT and TPS learning model provided equally good learning achievement. 2) The students with high mathematics learning creativity had mathematics learning achievement better than those with medium and low learning creativity did, and those with medium and low learning creativities had equally good learning achievement. 3) In high and low mathematics learning creativity levels, the students treated with TSTS, NHT, and TPS learning model had equally good mathematics learning achievement. At medium mathematics learning creativity level, the students treated with TSTS and NHT learning models had equally good mathematics learning achievement, those treated with NHT and TPS learning models had equally good mathematics learning achievement, those treated with TSTS learning model had better mathematics learning achievement than those treated with TPS learning model. 4) In TSTS learning model, the students with high and medium learning creativity had equally good mathematics learning, those with medium and low learning creativity had equally good mathematics learning, those with high learning creativity had learning achievement better than the students with low mathematics learning creativity. In NHT and TPS learning model, the students with high, medium, and low mathematics learning creativity had better mathematics learning achievement.Keywords: Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS), Numbered Heads Together (NHT), Think Pair Share (TPS), Mathematics Learning Creativity.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN kOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) PADA MATERI POKOK TRIGONOMETRI DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL SISWA SMK DI KOTA MADIUN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Eva Tri Wahyuni; Budiyono Budiyono; Imam Sujadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: The aims of the research were to find out: (1) which produces better mathematics learning achievement among cooperative learning model Numbered Heads Together (NHT), Think Pair Share (TPS), or direct instruction model; (2) which have better learning achievement, students who have high emotional intelligence, medium, or low; (3) which gives a better learning achievement at each level of emotional intelligence, cooperative learning model Numbered Heads Together (NHT), Think Pair Share (TPS), or direct instruction model; (4) which have a better learning achievement at each learning model, students who have the emotional intelligence high, medium, or low. This research was a quasi-experimental research which designed a 3x3 factorial. The population of the research was all students at eleventh grade high school vocational and engineering technology group in Madiun city on academic year 2013/2014. The samples of the research were 264 respondents consisting of 87 students by using cooperative learning model Numbered Heads Together (NHT), 89 students by using cooperative learning model Think Pair Share (TPS), and 88 students by using direct instruction model. Analysis of the data used two-way analysis of variance. Based on the results of this research, it can be concluded: (1) the cooperative learning model NHT produces the same mathematics learning achievement as TPS, whereas NHT and TPS produce mathematics learning achievement better than the direct instruction model; (2) the students with high, medium and low emotional intelligence have the same learning achievement; (3) the emotional intelligence of each, NHT produces the same mathematics learning achievement as TPS, whereas NHT and TPS produce mathematics learning achievement better than the direct instruction; (4) the learning model of each, students with high, medium and low emotional intelligence have the same learning achievement. Keywords: NHT, TPS, Emotional Intelligence, Trigonometry.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION DAN TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT DENGAN PENDEKATAN REALISTIC MATHEMATICS EDUCATION PADA MATERI LUAS PERMUKAAN DAN VOLUME BANGUN RUANG DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT Lenny Puspita Dewi; Budiyono Budiyono; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: The aims of this research were to determine: (1) which one providing the better mathematics learning achievement, the students using cooperative learning models of TAI type with RME, TGT with RME, or direct instruction model; (2) which one having the better mathematics learning achievement, the students with types of AQ either climbers, campers, or quitters; (3) at each learning models, which one having better learning achievement, the students with types of AQ either climbers, campers, or quitters; (4) at each students’ types of AQ, which one having better learning achievement, the students using cooperative learning model of TAI type with RME, TGT with RME, or direct instruction model. This research employed a quasy-experimental research method with 3x3 factorial design. The population of this research was all of the VIII grader of State Junior High School in Kulon Progo Regency. The sample was taken using stratified cluster random sampling, with 288 students as the sample consisting 95 students for first experiment class, 96 students for second experiment class, and 97 students for control class. The instruments that used to collect data were AQ questionnaire and test of mathematics achievement. The research hypothesis testing was done using a two-way variance analysis with unbalanced cells. The results of the research show that: (1) cooperative learning model of TAI type with RME gave better mathematics learning achievement than cooperative learning model of TGT type with RME and direct instruction model, and cooperative learning model of TGT type with RME gave better mathematics learning achievement than direct instruction model; (2) the students with AQ of climbers type have a better mathematics learning achievement than campers type and quitters type, and the students with AQ of campers type have a better mathematics learning achievement than quitters type; (3) at each types of the AQ, the students exposed to the cooperative learning model of TAI type with RME gave the better mathematics learning achievement than cooperative learning model of TGT type with RME and direct instruction model, and cooperative learning model of TGT type with RME gave better achievement than direct instruction model; (4) at each learning model, the students with AQ of climbers type have a better mathematics learning achievement than campers and quitters type, and the students with AQ of campers type have a better mathematics learning achievement than quitters type.Keywords: TAI with RME, TGT with RME, AQ, and mathematics learning achievement.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR AND SHARE (TPS) DAN TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI LENGKUNG DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN SPASIAL Virlina Zuhanisani; Budiyono Budiyono; Sri Subanti
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the spatial intelligence of the students. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning model of the Think Pair And Share (TPS) type with scientific approach, Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) model type with scientific approach, and classical model with scientific approach. The type of this study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3x3 factorial design. The population was all grade IX students of Junior High Schools in Grobogan Regency. Instruments used for data collection were mathematics achievement test and spatial intelligence test. Data analysis tecnique was used to test the hypothesis was two-ways analysis of variance with unbalanced cell as a 3x3 factorial design. Based on the hypothesis, the results of the study can be explained as follows. (1) Scientific TPS got better achievement than scientific TAI and with scientific classical, scientific TAI got better achievement than scientific classical. (2) Students with high spatial intelligence got the same achievement as middle spatial intelligence. In addition, students who had high and middle spatial intelligence got better achievement than those who had low spatial intelligence. (3) In the spatial intelligence of high category, the achievement of the students who were treated with scientific TPS was better than those who were treated with scientific TAI and treated with scientific classical, students treated who were with scientific TAI got same achievement with those treated who were with scientific classical. In the spatial intelligence category of middle and low, with scientific TPS, with scientific TAI and with scientific classical gave the same achievement. (4) In the with scientific TPS, the students who had high spatial intelligence got the same achievement with middle spatial intelligence. In addition, the students who had high and middle spatial intelligence got better achievement than those who had low spatial intelligence. In the with scientific TAI and with scientific classical, the students who had high, middle, and low spatial intelligence got same achievement.Keywords: Think Pair And Share, Team Assisted Individualization, Classical, Scientific Approach, Spatial Intelligence.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TTW DAN NHT PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIS SISWA Nurina Kurniasari Rahmawati; Budiyono Budiyono; Dewi Retno Sari S
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: The aim of the research was to find out the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the student mathematics communications ability. The learning model compared were TTW (Think Talk Write), NHT (Numbered Head Together) and conventional. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental by 3 12Ã—"> 3 factorial design. The population was the eight grade student of junior high school in Magelang regency on academic year 2013/2014. The sampling tecnique was stratified cluster random sampling. The size of the sampel was 298 students consisted of 100 students in the first experimental group, 99 students in second experimental group and 99 students in control group. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and mathematics communication ability test. The data was analyzed using unbalanced two-way analysis of variance. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) TTW learning model gives better mathematics achievement than NHT and conventional learning model, and NHT learning model gives better mathematics achievement than conventional learning model. (2) The students with high mathematics communication ability have better mathematics achievement than the students with middle or low mathematics communication ability, the students with middle mathematics communication ability have better mathematics achievement than the students with low mathematics communication ability, (3) a. In the students with high and middle mathematics communication ability, TTW, NHT and conventional learning model give the same mathematics achievement, b. In the students with low mathematics communication ability, TTW and NHT learning model give the same mathematics achievement, but give better mathematics achievement than conventional learning model, also NHT and conventional learning model give the same mathematics achievement, (4) a. In the TTW and NHT learning model, students with high, middle and low mathematics communication ability have the same mathematics achievement, b. In the conventional learning model, students with high and middle mathematics communication ability have the same mathematics achievement, but have better mathematics achievement than students with low mathematics communication ability, and students with middle and low mathematics communication ability have the same mathematics achievement.Keywords: TTW, NHT, mathematics communication ability, mathematics achievement

Title

Found 45 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 45 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 45 Documents
Search