Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.405
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Jurnal Notariil International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Amicus Curiae
Irene Eka Sihombing
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 9 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 9 Documents
Search

 1 
LAND OWNERSHIP BASED ON NATIONAL LAND LAW IN INDONESIA Sihombing, Irene Eka
Jurnal Notariil Vol 3, No 1 (2018)
Publisher : Notary Department, Post Graduated Program, Warmadewa University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/jn.3.1.683.65-74

Abstract

This study examines the certainty of ownership of land rights under the national law on land in Indonesia. It is a type of nomative focusing on reviewing the laws governing land and ownership for Indonesian citizens and foreign nationals living in Indonesia. The approaches used were the conceptual and statute approaches to legislation. The data collected are in the form of articles of law that regulate and related to land and ownership. Qualitative method was a method used in analyzing and presenting data. The results indicate that the statutory provisions are indispensable. The ownership of land rights previously adopted from the Land Law of the West is no longer applicable to date in Indonesia. The study is recommended for those interested in the system and land law investigations to be used as reference material in the theoretical and practical review of the law.
PEMBERIAN GANTI KERUGIAN DALAM PENGADAAN TANAH DI BAWAH 5 (LIMA) HEKTAR DI KOTA BEKASI (STUDI KASUS PROYEK PEMBANGUNAN INSTALASI PENGELOLAAN AIR (IPA)): Granting of Compensation in Land Procurement under 5 (Five) Hectars in Bekasi City (Case Study of Water Management Instalation Development Project) Sari, Fary Fitriana Gita; Sihombing, Irene Eka
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i2.19741

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe the provision of compensation in land acquisition under 5 (five) hectares in Bekasi City and in this case makes the author conduct further research with the formulation of the problem whether the process of providing compensation in land acquisition under 5 (five) ) hectares in Bekasi City (Case Study of the Water Management Installation Project Development Project is in accordance with Law Number 2 of 2012 and how to provide compensation in the procurement of land under 5 (five) hectares in Bekasi City (Case Study of the Installation Construction Project Water Management in terms of the position of the community with ownership status of Freehold Land and State Land.The research conducted is normative legal research, with the nature of descriptive research, the type of data used is secondary data.The research is conducted qualitatively by drawing deductive logical conclusions. The results of the research are that the process of providing compensation to the project is in accordance with Law Number 2 of 2012, but in the process of providing compensation there are obstacles at the deliberation stage where the community objects to the results of the compensation assessment and also to the people who use the land and constructing buildings on state land The author's conclusion regarding the obstacles that have occurred have been resolved by the land procurement committee.
PENITIPAN GANTI RUGI DALAM PENGADAAN TANAH JALAN TOL SERPONG-BALARAJA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 422/PDT.BTH/2021/PN TNG) : Custody of Compensation in Land Procurement for the Serpong-Balaraja Toll Road (Study of Verdict Number 422/PDT.BTH/2020/PN Tng) Fadilla Ramdani; Irene Eka Sihombing
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 3 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i3.20168

Abstract

The construction of the Serpong-Balaraja toll road faced issues with the amount of compensation not matching the determined results, leading to Custody of Compensation in the District Court. This article addresses two main problems: (1) Whether the Custody of Indemnity Procedure by the Ministry of Public Works and Public Housing (PUPR) and the Director aligns with the law, and (2) How the judge ruled in the Maryati case regarding the Custody of Indemnity by the Ministry of PUPR. This descriptive normative research uses literature studies for data collection, analyzed qualitatively, with conclusions drawn using the deductive method. It was found that the Ministry of PUPR and the Director General of Bina followed the consignment process correctly according to the laws, yet under Presidential Regulation Number 71 of 2012, if the eligible party rejects the compensation amount set by a final court decision, the consignment process fails to reach an agreement. Thus, the conclusion is that the Indemnity Deposit Procedure by the Ministry of PUPR in acquiring land for the Serpong-Balaraja toll road project did not comply with the applicable laws and regulations.
GANTI KERUGIAN PENGADAAN TANAH LRT JABODEBEK TERHADAP BANGUNAN PENGGARAP DI ATAS TANAH BUMN: Compensation For LRT Jabodebek Land Acquisition For Cultivator Buildings on BUMN-Owned Asset Land Medianti, Innayah Rahmatunisa; Sihombing, Irene Eka
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/mbbkxf42

Abstract

Land acquisition for the construction of the Jabodebek LRT Phase I needs to be considered about proper and fair compensation for those who are entitled. The main issues discussed are the mechanism for providing compensation to buildings on BUMN land assets affected by the Jabodebek LRT Phase I construction and how to resolve compensation for cultivator buildings whose ownership is still disputed over BUMN asset land. Regarding the compensation mechanism for land acquisition, it is regulated in Article 28-41 of Law No. 2 of 2012. In addition, the cultivator's building covering an area of ​​29 m2 could not be given directly because there was no agreement on the resolution of the ownership dispute. In conclusion, compensation was deposited at the local district court in accordance with Article 42 paragraph (2) letter b and settlement of compensation for the disputed cultivator's building with Decision Number 45/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Ckr. It should be given directly if there is a prior agreement to resolve the ownership dispute and the cultivator provides detailed proof of building ownership
TINJAUAN YURIDIS STATUS TANAH DALAM PEMBAHARUAN HAK GUNA BANGUNAN: Jurdicial Review Of Land Status In Building Use Right Renewal Fadhila Rizqia Fananny; Irene Eka Sihombing
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 7 No 3 (2025): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v7i3.23136

Abstract

Land disputes are still one of the main problems in Indonesia that often arise, one of which concerns Building Rights Title, which is a form of land rights regulated in Article 35 of Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Principles. This research discusses legal issues related to the renewal of PT Indobuildco's Building Rights Title (HGB) on Sultan Hotel land, which was rejected by the government even though the applicant had fulfilled administrative requirements. The research analyze the legal status of the disputed land and the implications of the rejection of the HGB renewal on legal certainty. The method used is normative juridical with secondary data analysis in form of laws and regulations, legal theories, and supporting documents. The results show that the refusal to renew the HGB has an impact on the uncertainty of land status, which hinders the implementation of legal obligations by private subjects. This refusal decision must fulfill the good governance principles, such as transparency and accountability. The conclusion of this research is that the case of PT Indobuildco's HGB renewal on Sultan Hotel land reflects the lack of legal certainty in the management of state land, especially related to HGB and HPL disputes. 
Akibat Hukum Penetapan Tanah Musnah: Ganti Rugi atau Dana Kerohiman? Setiawati, Anda; Probondaru, Ignatius Pradipa; Arsawan, I Gede Yudi; Sihombing, Irene Eka; Nabilah, Hana Jihan
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 14 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2025.v14.i01.p05

Abstract

The missing of land is one of the causes of the abolition of land rights. With the enactment of Government Regulation Number 18 Year 2021 and Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 17 Year 2021, an issue arises where landowners whose land has been missing demand compensation because a national strategic project will be built on the land. The purpose of this study is to explain the legal aspect of land rights over missing land and to provide an overview of the form of compensation given to landowners whose land has been declared missing, whether in the form of compensation or compassion funds. This study employs a normative juridical research method based on secondary data. According to Presidential Regulation Number 52 Year 2022 as amended by Presidential Regulation Number 27 Year 2023, for lands declared missing and intended for construction in the public interest, only compassion funds are provided, as the priority rights of the landowner to reclaim or reconstruct the land are disregarded. Compensation may be provided if the land declared missing is to be used for public interest projects or national strategic projects and has been reclaimed or reconstructed by the landowner. Musnahnya tanah merupakan salah satu penyebab hapusnya hak atas tanah. Dengan diundangkannya Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 18 Tahun 2021 dan Peraturan Menteri Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 17 Tahun 2021 memunculkan persoalan, di mana pemilik tanah yang tanahnya musnah menuntut ganti rugi karena di lokasi tanah akan dibangun proyek strategi nasional. Tujuan dilakukannya kajian ini adalah untuk menjelaskan aspek hukum hak atas tanah dari tanah musnah dan bentuk kompensasi yang diberikan kepada pemilik tanah yang tanahnya terindikasi musnah, apakah dalam bentuk ganti rugi atau berupa dana kerohiman. Dalam kajian ini digunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif yang berbasis pada data sekunder. Berdasarkan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 52 Tahun 2022 yang sudah diubah dengan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 27 Tahun 2023 untuk tanah-tanah yang terindikasi musnah dan akan digunakan untuk pembangunan demi kepentingan umum, hanya diberikan dana kerohiman karena hak prioritas dari pemilik tanah berupa hak untuk mereklamasi atau merekonstruksi dikesampingkan. Pemberian ganti rugi dapat diberikan dalam kondisi tanah yang terindikasi musnah sudah direkonstruksi atau direklamasi oleh pemilik tanah dan tanah itu akan digunakan untuk pembangunan proyek-proyek demi kepentingan umum atau proyek strategi nasional.
PARATE EKSEKUSI ATAS TANAH HAK MILIK SEBAGAI JAMINAN UTANG Elvira Diba Fahlevi; Irene Eka Sihombing; Diba Fahlevi, Elvira
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i6.15255

Abstract

A credit arrangement existed between M.Nova Irdiansa, the debtor, and Bank CIMB Niaga, the creditor, in the case that took place on October 20, 2014. In its ruling on the issue, the Supreme Court's panel of judges rejected the plaintiffs' request for a memorandum of cassation, which was included in the judgement. The plaintiffs in this case, M.Nova Irdiansa and Hj.Enny Adriati, are subject to Article 6 of the Mortgage Act (Parate Eksecusi), which provides legal certainty for debt repayment. The issue is whether Bank CIMB Niaga's execution of mortgage rights on freehold land through a public auction complies with the Minister of Finance Regulation Number 27/PMK.06/2016. Research method is normative law, analytical descriptive, the source literature studies, interviews informants and using deductive logic method. The results the research, discussion and conclusion are that the judge rejected the plaintiffs' cassation because Bank CIMB Niaga was proven to have been authorized by law to carry out executions without the consent of the debtor granting Mortgage Rights (Parate Execution), the implementation of which was based on the promise in Article 2 number 6 Deed of Granting Mortgage Rights (APHT) Number 233/2014, namely by way of auction because it had been agreed beforehand.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KREDITUR PREFERENCE DALAM EKSEKUSI HAK TANGGUNGAN (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 695 K/PDT/2021): Legal Protection For Preference Creditors In The Execution Of Collective Rights (Study Of Decision Number 695 K/Pdt/2021) Irnanda Lucky Ajisaputri; Irene Eka Sihombing
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i1.19253

Abstract

The protection that is guaranteed when mortgage right comes into effect is protection intended by mortgage rights law. Formulation of problem in this research is (1) What is legal protection for Bank Rakyat Indonesia as the preferred creditor, (2) What is the judge's decision in the case of debtor in default in Decision Number 695 K/Pdt/2021. This research includes normative juridical which is descriptive in nature. Results of research and discussion are that legal protection for BRI as the preferred creditor is regulated by Article 6 of Law Number 4 of 1996 and punishes Halim Peace and Serli to pay principal arrears for credit facility for month of September 2019 amounting to IDR 1,320,590,708.00. Conclusion is that legal protection for creditors is provided through Law Number 4 of 1996 Article 6, Article 20 and Article 21 and in Decision Number 695 K/Pdt/2021, judge rejected plaintiffs' lawsuit against debtor in default, allowing the execution of an auction for disputed object in accordance with Article 6 of Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights over Land, and ordered payment of principal and interest arrears by debtor to PT. BRI, and ordered cassation applicant to pay court costs amounting to IDR 500,000.00.
SETTLEMENT OF JURIDICAL PROBLEMS OF LAND ASSETS OWNERSHIP PT. INDONESIAN RAILWAY (PERSERO) REGIONAL DIVISION I NORTH SUMATRA Endang Pandamdari; Irene Eka Sihombing; Listyowati Sumanto
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): May
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v3i3.916

Abstract

Land assets PT. Kereta Api Indonesia (PT. KAI) in several locations is controlled by other parties, giving rise to juridical problems over ownership of land assets by PT. KAI. The purpose of writing is to describe the causes of the problem of ownership of land assets of PT. KAI Regional Division 1 North Sumatra, and describes the settlement of juridical problems of land ownership of PT. KAI Regional Division 1 North Sumatra. The results of the study indicate that the cause of the juridical problems of land ownership of PT. KAI is PT. KAI does not yet have a land certificate as the strongest proof of land ownership, because the land asset ownership rights of PT. KAI is in the form of grondkaart. Settlement of juridical problems of land ownership of PT. KAI is carrying out land registration for all land assets of PT. KAI, so that PT. KAI has a certificate of land rights as the strongest proof of land ownership. Besides that PT. KAI needs to collaborate with the Attorney General's Office, City/Regency Land Offices, and law enforcers to return state assets that are in third parties. In this case PT. KAI needs to safeguard assets including data collection/mapping of assets, installation of boundary markers, installation of asset marking boards, controlling, fencing after controlling, and finally saving assets through legal or litigation channels.
Co-Authors Diba Fahlevi, Elvira Elvira Diba Fahlevi Endang Pandamdari Fadhila Rizqia Fananny Fadilla Ramdani I Gede Yudi Arsawan Ignatius Pradipa Probondaru Irnanda Lucky Ajisaputri Listyowati Sumanto Medianti, Innayah Rahmatunisa Nabilah, Hana Jihan Sari, Fary Fitriana Gita Setiawati, Anda