Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.836
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal E-Mabis: Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen dan Bisnis Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Jurnal Abdidas Jurnal Geuthee Jurnal Kajian Manajemen dan Wirausaha REUSAM ; Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Suloh : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh Management Research and Behavior Journal Jurnal Solusi Masyarakat (JSM)
Zulkifli
Department Of Economics And Business, Faculty Of Economics, Universitas Malikussaleh, Lhokseumawe
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : REUSAM

 1 
KEBIJAKAN PENEGAKKAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP PENGHINAAN BENTUK TUBUH DI MEDIA SOSIAL Zulkifli Z
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Reusam Vol 8, No 1 (2020): Mei
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Malikussaleh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29103/reusam.v8i1.5242

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menjelaskan Kebijakan penegakan hukum pidana terhadap Penghinaan Bentuk Tubuh  Di Media Sosial berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Adapun Metode pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah Penelitian hukum normatif meliputi penelitian terhadap asas- asas hukum, taraf sinkronisasi hukum. Jenis penelitian yang dipergunakan adalah metode penelitian deskriptif, yaitu penelitian yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan pustaka (data sekunder) atau penelitian hukum perpustakaan.  Hasil penelitian di ketahuai bahwa Kebijakan Penegakan hukum pidana terhadap tindakan penghinaan bentuk tubuh (body shaming) di media sosial berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik dianggap sebagai suatu tindak pidana karena perbuatan penghinaan bentuk tubuh (body shaming), dapat dikualifikasikan sebagai tindak pidana sebagaimana dimaksud Pasal 27 ayat (3) jo. Pasal 45 ayat (3) UU ITE.  Penghinaan bentuk tubuh (body shaming) merupakan perbuatan penghinaan yang secara tertulis, yang dilakukan dengan cara mentransmisikan dan/atau mendistribusikan pada media sosial. Sehingga informasi elektronik dan/atau dokumen elektronik yang bermuatan atau mengandung penghinaan tersebut dapat diakses oleh umum. Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia dalam pelaksanaannya belum efektif, hal ini dikarenakan masih banyaknya pengguna media sosial di Indonesia yang melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum di Media sosial akibat keterbatasan pengetahuan tentang Undang-Udang ITE.
Analisis Yuridis Putusan Hakim Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penipuan (Studi Putusan Nomor : 70/Pid.B/2020/Pn.Bpd) Zulkifli Z; Tahjul Mila; Yusrizal Y
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Reusam Vol 9, No 1 (2021): Mei
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Malikussaleh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29103/reusam.v9i1.4185

Abstract

This study is to find out the proof of the crime of fraud and to find out the juridical analysis of the judge's decision on the crime of fraud in adjudicating the crime of fraud based on the decision Number: 70/Pid.B/2020/PN.Bpd. One of the laws that regulate social life is criminal law, which regulates all legal rules that determine what regulations against perpetrators of crimes should be imposed on perpetrators. Because basically the purpose of law is to uphold justice so that public order and peace can be realized. From the above description concerning acts or actions that violate the law and are not in accordance with the norms (laws) that have been established, it is a criminal act of fraud as regulated in Article 378 of the Criminal Code. As for this research, it is not an ordinary fraud but a fraud carried out by means of the position given to him so that it can be more burdensome for the perpetrators of criminal acts. In this decision, which is a decision on a criminal case of fraud, is it significant with article 378 of the Criminal Code. This research uses normative juridical research. The sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials, and the technique of collecting legal materials in this study is a document or literature research technique (library research). The tool used to collect data in this research is a literature study, the data analysis used is by means of analysis of the interpretation method / legal interpretation in the form of systematic interpretation. Based on the results of the study, conclusions were obtained, namely: First, proof of criminal fraud against cases with Number 70/Pid.B/2020/PN.Bpd. it is in accordance with the formulation of Article 378 of the Criminal Code regarding fraud, through juridical considerations based on the factors revealed in the trial and the facts that are used as the basis for consideration to make a decision against the defendant. Second, in Decision Number: 70/Pid.B/2020/PN.Bpd. The Panel of Judges was not careful in using non-juridical legal considerations and in this case there should be a break in the new law because it was made based on it. In this decision the judge did not prioritize justice for the victim, indeed in the case of fraud there was no restitution for the victim, but at least the judge was more burdensome in punishment to the defendant by imposing a crime under Article 52 of the Criminal Code which explains that an official for committing a crime violates a special obligation from his position , or when he commits a crime, he uses the power, opportunity or means given to him because of his position, the punishment may be increased by one third.
ANALISIS HUKUM PIDANA DAN KRIMINOLOGI TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENISTAAN AGAMA DI INDONESIA Nurul Safrina; Yusrizal Yusrizal; Zulkifli Zulkifli
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Reusam Vol 10, No 1 (2022): Vol 10, No 1 (2022): Mei
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Malikussaleh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29103/reusam.v10i1.8912

Abstract

Blasphemy is one of the criminal acts of insulting and degrading a religion. Blasphemy comes from two words, namely blasphemy and religion, blasphemy comes from the word blasphemy which means low blasphemy. Religion also means a deliberate attack on the good name and honor of another person or a groups both orally and in writing with the aim of being known by the wider community.The purpose of the research from the perspective of criminal law is to look at the concept of accountability for criminal acts of blasphemy in Indonesia and the protection of religious law for someone who commits blasphemy, while from a criminological perspective to look at the arrangements for criminal liability for perpetrators of criminal acts of blasphemy in Indonesia and regulations Religion from the Criminal Code (KUHP). The method used in this research is Normative (Normative Legal Research). This type of research uses qualitative research. The research approach that is carried out is more aimed at the statute approach. Conceptual Approach The nature of the research in this thesis is descriptive research. The form of this research is a form of prescriptive book of criminal law. The results of this study indicate that the legal arrangement regarding the crime of blasphemy in Indonesia is regulated in Article 156 of the Criminal Code as for the contents of the article which reads: whoever publicly expresses and expresses feelings of hostility, hatred or humiliation towards one or several groups or groups of Indonesian people, threatened with a maximum imprisonment of five years or a maximum fine of four thousand five hundred rupiah. The word group or group in this article is interpreted as part of the Indonesian people who have differences both in terms of religion, place and country, race, descent, nationality or position according to article 156 of the Criminal Code. It is recommended that legal arrangements regarding criminal acts of blasphemy in Indonesia need to be perfected by adding articles that are able to answer all the needs of the community, both in the Criminal Code and the Law of the Republic of Indonesia.
Co-Authors Ainun Fatwa Arief Rahman Azhar Hasan Bahri, Halida Budi S.H. Bahreisy Cindy Febrina G Gebrina Hadi Iskandar Hijroton H Irsadiah Lingga Iswadi Ak Juanda Juanda Mai Simahatie Marliyah Muchtar, Darmawati Muhammad Nasir Mukmim Alamsyah Putra Matondang Muzaffarsyah, Teuku Naufal Bachri, Naufal Nurul Safrina Qiella Syahfitri Rais Khalil Mubarak Romi Asmara Saharuddin Saharuddin Sapna Biby Saputra, Ferdy Sastro, Marlia Sutriani Tahjul Mila Yusrizal Hasbi Yusrizal Y Zoelman Subaidi