Wuisang, Ari
UNIVERSITAS PAKUAN

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

ESSENSI PLURALISME HUKUM INTERNASIONAL DALAM PERSPEKTIF SISTEM HUKUM DUNIA Sukmana, Sobar; Susilawati, Tuti; Chairijah, Chairijah; Heriyanto, Bambang; Wuisang, Ari
PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Vol 10, No 3 (2024): Volume 10, Nomor 3 July-September 2024
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PAKUAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33751/palar.v10i3.10448

Abstract

ABSTRAK Tujuan penelitian ini ialah untuk menjelaskan bahwa Pluralisme hukum dahulu merupakan kebijakan dari banyak kekuatan kolonial dan warisan yang masih hidup di banyak bekas koloni Eropa seperti Indonesia, Malaysia dan Singapura. Pengertian pluralisme hukum senantiasa mengalami perkembangan dari masa ke masa di mana ada koeksistensi dan interelasi berbagai hukum seperti hukum adat, negara, agama dan sebagainya. Adanya globalisasi menyebabkan hubungan tersebut menjadi semakin kompleks karena terkait pula dengan perkembangan hukum internasional. Pluralisme hukum dalam perspektif global adalah terjadinya saling ketergantungan, adopsi, atau saling pengaruh (interdependensi, interfaces) antara berbagai sistem hukum. Interdependensi yang dimaksud terutama adalah antara hukum internasional dan hukum nasional. Hukum dari wilayah tertentu dapat menembus ke wilayah-wilayah lain yang tanpa batas. Hukum internasional dan transnasional dapat menembus ke wilayah negara-negara manapun. Terjadi interaksi, Interrelasi, saling pengaruh dan saling adopsi. Sistem hukum di dunia menurut Steven Vago, dalam bukunya Sociology of law 1999 yaitu Common Law System, Civil Law System, Communist Law System dan Islam Law System. Dalam perkembangannya sistem hukum dunia dikenal juga “Hybrid Law System” atau sistem hukum cangkokan/campuran dan di Eropa, disebut “Harmonization Law System”, atau “Unification Law System”. Kata Kunci : System Hukum, Pluralisme, Hukum Internasional. ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to explain that legal pluralism was a policy of many colonial powers and a legacy that is still alive in many former European colonies such as Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore. The notion of legal pluralism has always experienced development from time to time where there is coexistence and interrelation of various laws such as customary law, state, religion and so on. The existence of globalisation causes the relationship to become more complex because it is also related to the development of international law. Legal pluralism in a global perspective is the occurrence of interdependence, adoption, or mutual influence (interdependence, interfaces) between various legal systems. The interdependence in question is primarily between international law and national law. Laws from certain regions can penetrate into other regions without borders. International and transnational law can penetrate into the territory of any country. There is interaction, interrelation, mutual influence and mutual adoption. Legal systems in the world according to Steven Vago, in his book Sociology of law, 1999, namely the Common Law System, Civil Law System, Communist Law System and Islamic Law System. In its development, the world legal system is also known as the "Hybrid Law System" or grafted legal system, and in Europe, it is called the "Harmonisation Law System", or "Unification Law System". Keywords: Legal System, Pluralism, International Law.
The Procedure For Amending The 1945 Constitution Is Reviewed In Terms Of Positive Law Of The Republic Of Indonesia Wuisang, Ari; Nugraha, Roby Satya
PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Vol 11, No 1 (2025): Volume 11, Number 1 January-March 2025
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PAKUAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33751/palar.v11i1.11580

Abstract

Abstrak Penelitian ini membahas prosedur perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar (UUD) Tahun 1945 serta lembaga yang berwenang dalam proses perubahan tersebut. Melalui pendekatan yuridis normatif, penelitian ini menganalisis fleksibilitas atau rigiditas prosedur perubahan UUD 1945 serta mencari formulasi ideal untuk perubahan konstitusi di masa depan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa prosedur perubahan UUD 1945 pasca reformasi bersifat rigid, dengan persyaratan yang lebih ketat dibandingkan sebelumnya, khususnya dalam mekanisme pengajuan perubahan oleh Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat (MPR). Rigiditas ini berpotensi menghambat adaptasi konstitusi terhadap dinamika masyarakat dan perkembangan hukum. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini merekomendasikan revisi terhadap persyaratan pengajuan perubahan agar lebih inklusif dan responsif terhadap kebutuhan hukum nasional. Kata kunci: perubahan UUD 1945, prosedur konstitusi, rigiditas hukum, Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat, reformasi hukum. Abstract This research discusses the procedures for amending the 1945 Constitution and the institutions authorized to carry out the amendment process. Through a normative juridical approach, this research analyzes the flexibility or rigidity of procedures for amending the 1945 Constitution and seeks ideal formulations for future constitutional changes. The research results show that the procedures for amending the 1945 Constitution after reform are rigid, with stricter requirements than before, especially in the mechanism for submitting changes by the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR). This rigidity has the potential to hinder the constitution's adaptation to societal dynamics and legal developments. Therefore, this research recommends revisions to the requirements for submitting changes to make them more inclusive and responsive to national legal needs. Key words: changes to the 1945 Constitution, constitutional procedures, legal rigidity, People's Consultative Assembly, legal reform
Tripartite Institutional Mechanism in the Discussion of the Draft Law Ari Wuisang; Roby Satya Nugraha
JURNAL AKTA Vol 12, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v12i4.46878

Abstract

This article explores the emergence and implementation of a tripartite institutional mechanism in the legislative process in Indonesia, particularly following the Constitutional Court Decisions No. 92/PUU-X/2012 and No. 79/PUU-XII/2014. These rulings affirm the legislative role of the Regional Representative Council (DPD) alongside the House of Representatives (DPR) and the President, establishing a more balanced representation in drafting laws within specific areas. Using a normative juridical approach, this study analyzes the constitutional foundations, institutional practices, and comparative perspectives on bicameralism. The research identifies significant structural and functional disparities between the DPR and DPD, despite the formal recognition of the DPD’s legislative rights. Although the DPD may participate in the first and second-level discussions of draft bills, it is excluded from the final approval stage. Moreover, DPD-initiated bills and proposed revisions are often ignored in practice, weakening its legislative impact. Drawing from comparative constitutional studies, the article highlights the typologies of bicameralism—ranging from perfect to weak—and situates Indonesia's model within the broader global context. The findings underline that a truly effective tripartite mechanism requires not only formal recognition but also practical and procedural adjustments to ensure power-sharing and institutional dignity. The authors recommend enhancing the DPD's authority through constitutional practices, internal institutional development, and greater political negotiation capacity to strengthen its legislative influence and create a more balanced parliamentary structure.