Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

CLASSROOM INTERACTION WITH DIFFERENT SUBJECT BASED ON SINCLAIR AND COULTHARD MODEL Indahwaty Suwandy; Siti Aisah Ginting; Rita Suswati
REGISTER: Journal of English Language Teaching of FBS-Unimed Vol 7, No 3 (2018): (JUL-SEP)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (291.14 KB) | DOI: 10.24114/reg.v7i3.12065

Abstract

This study is analysis of classroom interaction between English and Mathematics subject which conducted by teachers and students through communication in classroom interaction. The aims of this study were: (a) To identify the kinds of Initiation-Response-Feedback (IRF) pattern are used by the teacher and students in classroom interaction based on Sinclair and Coulthard Model (1975), and (b) To find out why the Initiation-Response-Feedback (IRF) pattern is dominant in classroom interaction through different subject. The design of the research used qualitative research. To answer the problem of study, the data collected through the following instrument: observation, recording and interviewing which were analyzed by using Sinclair and Coulthard model and a concept of teaching. The results of this research were the following, (a) it was found that in English and Mathematics classroom discourse, as the IR (Initiation-Response) was used more often by teachers and I (Initiation) was used by students in English classroom then IF (Initiation-Feedback) was used by students in Mathematics classroom, (b) the reason why the IRF pattern dominantly appeared based on teacher’s performance which dominantly initiated questions and information was affected by the presage category and context category then the students’ performance which dominantly responded the teachers’ questions and information was affected by the students’ thought processes category.Key words: Classroom interaction, classroom discourse, Sinclair and Coulthard Model, IRF Pattern.
FUNGSI PEMAGARAN JUDGEMENTAL PADA PIDATO PRESIDEN DONALD TRUMP Rita Suswati; Njaju Jenny Malik
BAHAS Vol 34, No 1 (2023): BAHAS
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24114/bhs.v34i1.47342

Abstract

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk memaparkan fungsi pemagaran judgmental pada pidato Presiden Donald Trump. Penelitian ini mengacu kepada teori pemagaran Hyland (1996a, 1996b, 1998a, 1998b). Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kualitatif. Sumber data penelitian terdiri dari lima (5) pidato Presiden Donald Trump dari tahun 2017 sampai dengan tahun 2021 yang dipilih secara khusus dari situs berita resmi pemerintah Amerika usa.gov. Hasil investigasi penelitian menemukan bahwa (1) pemagaran judgemental pada pidato Presiden Donald Trump bertujuan untuk menunjukkan pendapat pribadi penutur atas kebijakan yang diambil pemerintahnya, (2) Presiden Donald Trump meyakinkan publik Amerika dengan menggunakan pemagaran judgemental agar setuju dengan kebijakan yang diambil pemerintahannya Kata kunci: pemagaran judgemental, fungsi pemagaran judgemental, pidato Presiden Donald Trump  ABSTRACTThis study aims to describe the function of hedging in Donald Trump’s speeches that is judgement verbs. This study refers to Hyland’s Hedging Taxonomy theory (1996a, 1996b, 1998a, 1998b) using the qualitative research method. The data consisted of five (5) political speeches of President Donald Trump from 2017 to 2021 that was selected from the U. S official online news usa.gov. The investigation indicated two main function of judgment verbs as hedging in the President Donald Trump’ speeches; (1) the judgment verbs used in the Donald Trump’s speeches aimed to show his personal opinion on U. S government policy, (2) President Donald Trump used judgement verbs to convince the U. S publics to approve on U. S government policy. Keywords: judgment verbs, the function of judgment verbs, President Donald Trump’s speeches.
Peran Hedging dalam Membangun Citra Positif dalam Pidato Presiden AS Rita Suswati; Dinda Khairani Pratiwi; Jessica Paskah Elizabeth Manullang; Nailah
BASASTRA: JURNAL KAJIAN BAHASA DAN SASTRA INDONESIA Vol. 13 No. 3 (2024): BASASTRA: JURNAL KAJIAN BAHASA DAN SASTRA INDONESIA
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Hedging is an important rhetorical strategy in political discourse, used to show a degree of confidence and build a positive image of the leader, especially in US Presidential speeches from 1993 to 2021. The purpose of this study is to analyze the role of hedging in building a positive image and understand the variations of its use based on the political context and audience. The method used is a qualitative literature study, with secondary data analysis in the form of speech transcripts and related literature. The main findings show that the use of hedging varies between presidents, where Bill Clinton and Barack Obama use it to maintain credibility and reinforce commitments, while Donald Trump uses it less, but still in a diplomatic context. The research conclusion confirms that hedging has an important role in building a positive image of the leader but should be used with caution so as not to be misinterpreted as uncertainty.