Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.023
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review JURNAL Al-AZHAR INDONESIA SERI HUMANIORA Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Universitas Al Azhar Indonesia JHR (Jurnal Hukum Replik) Cakrawala Repositori Imwi Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies Fundamental : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Ijtimā`iyya: Journal of Muslim Society Research Jurnal Magister Ilmu Hukum : Hukum dan Kesejahteraan Binamulia Hukum
Suartini
Universitas Al Azhar Indonesia
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 25 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Panti Asuhan Atas Kelalaian Terhadap Anak Titipan Zulham Ibrohim Ardhian Syah; Suartini
UNES Law Review Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/2rjhnd12

Abstract

Panti asuhan sebagai institusi sosial bertanggung jawab moral dan hukum dalam memberikan pengasuhan dan perlindungan kepada anak-anak titipan. Anak titipan adalah anak yang secara sukarela dititipkan oleh orang tua atau walinya kepada panti asuhan untuk dirawat dan diasuh, namun pada  praktiknya, terjadi kelalaian yang dilakukan pengurus panti asuhan LKSA Ash-Shiddiqiyah Kulon Progo yakni pengasuh sekaligus pimpinan lembaga, Muhammad Tulus melakukan pelecehan seksual terhadap anak asuhnya sendiri di panti asuhan tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk pertanggungjawaban hukum panti asuhan apabila terjadi kelalaian dalam pengasuhan anak titipan, serta mengkaji dasar hukum yang mengatur perlindungan terhadap anak di bawah pengasuhan lembaga. Metode penelitian memakai metode empiris, data yang dihasilakan melalui wawancara pada dinas sosial kulon progo dan kantor kelurahan Hargowilis. Temuan riset memperlihatkan. Kasus pencabulan anak oleh pimpinan LKSA Ash-Shiddiqiyah di Kulon Progo menegaskan kerentanan anak terhadap kekerasan di lingkungan yang seharusnya aman. Pelaku dijatuhi hukuman 17 tahun penjara dan denda Rp100 juta berdasarkan Pasal 82 UU No. 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Anak. Peraturan Menteri Sosial No. 5 Tahun 2024 memperkuat pencegahan melalui ketentuan standar SDM dan pengawasan internal (Pasal 31–38), serta sanksi administratif berupa pencabutan izin dan daftar hitam lembaga (Pasal 42), yang menegaskan pentingnya pengawasan dan penegakan hukum dalam perlindungan anak di panti asuhan.
Rethinking Concurrent Creditor Protection in Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations Rijal Ibnu Sani; Suartini Suartini; Ahmad Ahmad; Tri Cahya Indra Permana; Misno Misno
Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31000/ijlp.v5i2.15932

Abstract

The current practice of Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) in Indonesia reveals a distributive justice anomaly that disadvantages petitioning creditors. A “free-rider” phenomenon has emerged, whereby passive creditors obtain equal or even more favorable treatment without bearing litigation costs or the substantial legal risks associated with initiating proceedings. This inequity is exacerbated by settlement schemes that tend to marginalize initiating creditors through excessive postponement of payment schedules. This study aims to deconstruct the application of the Pari Passu Pro Rata Parte principle when applied without regard to litigation cost contributions, and to formulate a more equitable framework of legal protection for petitioning creditors as initiators of the restructuring process. The research employs a normative juridical method, utilizing conceptual and statutory approaches to evaluate the consistency between bankruptcy procedures and the values of distributive justice. The findings indicate that the absence of a litigation cost recovery mechanism generates structural injustice within the PKPU framework. From a legal standpoint, the petitioner’s financial burden and procedural initiative should be recognized as prioritized costs within the settlement plan. In conclusion, the PKPU regime requires policy redefinition to ensure financial protection for petitioning creditors, prevent exploitation by passive creditors, and preserve the integrity of commercial law enforcement.
Artificial Intelligence as Digital Prose in Redefining Originality in Legal Discourse Rijal Ibnu Sani; Suartini Suartini; Ahmad Ahmad; Tri Cahya Indra Permana
Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31000/ijlp.v6i1.16087

Abstract

This research originates from the phenomenon of moralistic stigma and academic conservatism that tend to perceive the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a degradation of originality in legal scholarship. Historically and empirically, however, the evolution of intellectual instruments from the pen to the computer has consistently transformed modes of expression without ever extinguishing the essence of human thought itself. This study aims to deconstruct the myth of “handwritten originality” while legitimizing AI as a lawful co-creative instrument within the domain of telematics legal writing. Employing a conceptual approach and historical-technological comparison, the research finds that in the era of digital disruption, the essence of originality no longer resides in the mechanical construction of diction, but rather in the authority of logical curation, data validation, and argumentative direction elements that remain fundamentally controlled by the human legal subject as the holder of intellectual agency. The analysis concludes that AI should be understood as “Digital Prose,” evolutionarily comparable to the transformative impact of the typewriter and office software revolutions of previous decades. Systemic resistance to this technology is thus interpreted as a manifestation of technophobia that is increasingly incompatible with contemporary standards of performance, efficiency, and accuracy in modern legal discourse. The study recommends a redefinition of academic ethics that is more inclusive of human–machine collaboration in advancing global legal literacy
The Paradox of Cessie: Juridical Risks Behind the Euphoria of Non-Performing Asset Purchases Rijal Ibnu Sani; Suartini Suartini; Ahmad Ahmad; Tri Cahya Indra Permana; Gamal Abdul Nasir
Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31000/ijlp.v6i2.16090

Abstract

The phenomenon of bank receivables assignment (cessie) in Indonesia is currently experiencing a misleading paradigm shift, whereby this instrument is marketed as if it were a transaction for purchasing discounted property assets. The principal issue addressed in this study is a juridical paradox in the form of public misconception equating the position of the cessionary (assignee of receivables) with that of the direct owner of the secured object, whereas legally cessie merely constitutes the transfer of a claim right (vordering op naam). This research aims to deconstruct the proprietary nature of rights in cessie and to map the legal risks arising from the euphoria surrounding the acquisition of non-performing loans. The method employed is normative juridical research using statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings demonstrate that cessie does not automatically transfer ownership of the asset due to its accessory nature; physical control over the collateral still requires enforcement through mortgage execution procedures or eviction lawsuits, both of which are vulnerable to debtor resistance (derden verzet). The study concludes that the euphoria of purchasing cessie without proper legal risk mitigation will entrap buyers in protracted litigation and high costs. In essence, the buyer does not purchase a “house,” but rather a “right to claim,” fraught with legal uncertainty.
Challenging Military Court Jurisdiction Over Corruption Cases After Criminal Law Enforcement Suartini Suartini; Rijal Ibnu Sani
Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31000/ijlp.v6i1.16127

Abstract

The main issue in this research is the dualism of absolute jurisdiction in handling corruption cases involving Indonesian National Armed Forces personnel. Although the anti-corruption legal framework forms a unified lex specialis system, such cases are often tried in Military Courts, which lack key instruments like investigations by the Corruption Eradication Commission and Ad Hoc Corruption Judges. This study aims to challenge the procedural legality of Military Courts in adjudicating corruption cases and highlights the need to unify corruption adjudication. Using normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches, it identifies conflicts between Military Court Law and national anti-corruption laws. The findings show that the absence of specific anti-corruption mechanisms in the military leads to procedurally flawed decisions and violates equality before the law. Therefore, all corruption cases should be handled by the Corruption Court as a single forum. Referring to Article 65(2) of the Indonesian National Armed Forces Law, soldiers must be subject to general courts for general crimes, including corruption. Thus, jurisdictional unification is essential to ensure legal certainty, transparency, and effective anti-corruption enforcement in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Agil Aprilyanto Saputro Agus Haryono Saputro Ahmad Ahmad Amoury Adi Sudiro Bimo Tresnadipangga Dwi Ayu Rahmadani Dwi Yulia Sari Emilda Kuspraningrum Flambonita, Suci Fokky Fuad Fokky Fuad Fokky Fuad Fokky Fuad Wasitaatmadja Gamal Abdul Nasir Machmud, Aris Maslihati Nur Hidayati Misno Misno Muh Basri Nanang Suhendar Nizla Rohaya Nizla Rohaya Rijal Ibnu Sani Susianto susianto Syahruddin Siregar Tri Cahya Indra Permana, Tri Cahya Indra Yanci Libria Fista Yusup Hidayat Zuhad Aji Firmantoro Zulham Ibrohim Ardhian Syah