Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal)

IMPLIKASI PENGATURAN PELANGGARAN HAM BERAT DALAM KUHP 2023 TERHADAP KEBERLAKUAN ASAS-ASAS KHUSUSNYA: PENGUATAN ATAU PELEMAHAN? Rizqiqa, Larasati Dwi; Wulandari, Widati; Putri, Nella Sumika
LITIGASI Vol. 25 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v25i1.12416

Abstract

This paper discusses the impact of the regulation of gross violation of human rights in the Penal Code 2023 on the validity of the principles stipulated in Act Number 26, 2000 as the special law. The method used is normative research with data collection through literature study. The findings show that regarding the Article 187 and Article 620 of the Penal Code 2023, it can be said that these articles have actually provided a ‘guarantee’ to ensure that the existence of the Penal Code 2023 will not reduce or have any impact on the special principles in Act Number 26,2000. This is then strengthened by the provisions of Article 622 paragraph 1 letter m which only revokes several articles from the Act, namely Articles 8, 9, 36-40 on criminal offenses and sanctions for gross violation of human right. By using the theory of codification & the amendment of Article 3 of the Penal Code 2023, it was revealed that the regulation on gross violation of human right in the Penal Code 2023 is potentially to create new problems, from the issue of conflict of principles to of multiple interpretations. Different interpretations of Article 187, Article 620, and Article 3 of the Penal Code 2023 can actually lead to the inapplicability of special principles stipulated in Act Number 26, 2000, therefore, the provisions of gross violation of human right, in the future, are very likely to be subject to the general principles contained in Book I of the Penal Code 2023.
POLITIK HUKUM KEWARGANEGARAAN INDONESIA: STUDI TERHADAP STATUS WARGANEGARA YANG MENJADI FOREIGN TERORIST FIGHTERS (FTF) ISIS Kustiwa, Iwa; Harijanti, Susi Dwi; Wulandari, Widati
LITIGASI Vol. 24 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v24i1.6951

Abstract

Government policy reflects the extent to which Indonesian citizenship law accommodates the issue of Foreign Terrorist Fighter (FTF)s, as well as future projections of what can be done against FTF based on related laws and regulations, especially those related to citizenship laws. The method used in this study is normative juridical, with data collection through literature study. The results showed that the citizenship status of Foreign Terrorist Fighters from Indonesia based on a human rights perspective, the state can only revoke a person's citizenship based on a court decision. A person's citizenship status is a fundamental right, and a precious right, therefore, the rights of every citizen must be recognized, respected, protected, facilitated, and fulfilled by the state. In solving the problem of citizenship status of former FTF from Indonesia, it is necessary to improve performance and cooperation in the deradicalization process by all elements of the Government and Law Enforcement Officers commanded by the National Counterterrorism Agency and the development of sterile area infrastructure with a high security system to carry out the deradicalization process while carrying out the FTF citizenship status determination trial process. Keywords: Law, Citizenship, Foreign Terrorist Fighters.