Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 17 Documents
Search

HATE CRIMES DI INDONESIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF PERBANDINGAN HUKUM Wulandari, Widati
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 3 No. 1 (2017): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v3i1.2525

Abstract

This article discusses the deficiency of the Indonesian criminal law with regard to the criminalization of hate crimes. Taking into consideration the fact that Indonesia faces a high incidence of social conflict due to rising intolerance and discrimination targeting minority groups.  The combination of (racial-ethnic-religious) discrimination and hatred against minority groups in most cases results in various forms of common crimes which generally is known as hate crimes. Using a comparative law method, by and between Indonesian criminal law and the criminal law of other countries experiencing hate crimes, the author highlights options for eradicating hate crimes. One important finding is the tendency of a number of countries to perceive hatred or prejudice which motivate the perpetrator of hate crimes as aggravating factor and not to as as separate substantive offence.
Problematika Pengertian Aanslag-Aanslag tot en feit: Perbandingan Makar dalam KUHP, WvSNI dan Sr. Wulandari, Widati; Moeliono, Tristam P.
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 4, No 3 (2017): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Padjadjaran University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (335.209 KB)

Abstract

Makar dalam praktik penegakan hukum pidana di Indonesia sering kali ditafsirkan terlalu luas dan karenanya menjangkau perbuatan yang tidak selayaknya dikategorikan sebagai tindak pidana yang mengancam keselamatan negara. Tulisan ini hendak menelusuri kembali pemaknaan dua konsep penting dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia (Wetboek van Strafrecht Nederlands-Indie; WvSNI), yaitu aanslag maupun aanslag tot en feit. Metoda yang digunakan adalah metode penemuan hukum dan perbandingan hukum. Temuan terpenting adalah adanya kekeliruan penerjemahan istilah aanslag dan aanslag tot en feit secara otomatis sebagai makar dalam berbagai pasal KUHP. Koreksi terhadap itu seharusnya dilakukan agar penegakan hukum pidana tidak memunculkan ketidakadilan dalam wujud reaksi negara yang tidak proporsional dengan kadar kesalahan.  The Problematical Meaning of Aanslag-Aanslag tot en feit: Comparison of Treason in the Translated Version of the Indonesian Criminal Code and the Dutch Version AbstractTreason as a crime threatening the state’s security has been inappropriately applied to facts which does not in any way can be categorized as such. This article purports to retraceing two key concepts: aanslag (onslaught/attack) and aanslag tot en feit (commit) found in the Criminal Code. Method used in this article is legal finding and law comparison. The author’s main finding is that these concepts had been wrongly translated into treason with all the consequence thereof.Therefore, correction of the translation should avoid injustice in the form of state reaction not proportional to the wrong doing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v4n3.a3
THE ADEQUACY OF THE EVIDENCE IN THE CASE OF EVIL CONSPIRACY OF NARCOTICS CRIMINAL REVIEWED BY EVIDENTIARY THEORY Veronika Sihotang; Widati Wulandari; Erika Magdalena Chandra
Yustisia Jurnal Hukum Vol 9, No 3: December 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v9i3.42640

Abstract

Narcotics crime has been considered as a global crime and big issues in attempt to prevent and also by eradicate it. It's not only happens in Indonesia but also for other countries. Narcotics crime in most cases involves more than one person, who cooperates in narcotics crime. One of the criminal act involve more than one person is a conspiracy of narcotics crime. The involvement in the conspiracy is shown by two or more people agree to do narcotics crime. Admissible evidence in conspiracy of narcotics crime becomes the important issue in some of conspiracy's cases. This study used the method of judicial normative approach to review and examine the primary data such as judge's Decision and the secondary data such as related law. The purpose of this study is to know and understand whether the absence of evidence to support the defendant's denial can be the basis to proof personal's guilt and to understand how the quality of the witness testimony can be the basis of criminal conviction.
Problematika Pengertian Aanslag-Aanslag tot en feit: Perbandingan Makar dalam KUHP, WvSNI dan Sr. Widati Wulandari; Tristam P. Moeliono
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 4, No 3 (2017): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (335.209 KB)

Abstract

Makar dalam praktik penegakan hukum pidana di Indonesia sering kali ditafsirkan terlalu luas dan karenanya menjangkau perbuatan yang tidak selayaknya dikategorikan sebagai tindak pidana yang mengancam keselamatan negara. Tulisan ini hendak menelusuri kembali pemaknaan dua konsep penting dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia (Wetboek van Strafrecht Nederlands-Indie; WvSNI), yaitu aanslag maupun aanslag tot en feit. Metoda yang digunakan adalah metode penemuan hukum dan perbandingan hukum. Temuan terpenting adalah adanya kekeliruan penerjemahan istilah aanslag dan aanslag tot en feit secara otomatis sebagai makar dalam berbagai pasal KUHP. Koreksi terhadap itu seharusnya dilakukan agar penegakan hukum pidana tidak memunculkan ketidakadilan dalam wujud reaksi negara yang tidak proporsional dengan kadar kesalahan.  The Problematical Meaning of Aanslag-Aanslag tot en feit: Comparison of Treason in the Translated Version of the Indonesian Criminal Code and the Dutch Version AbstractTreason as a crime threatening the state’s security has been inappropriately applied to facts which does not in any way can be categorized as such. This article purports to retraceing two key concepts: aanslag (onslaught/attack) and aanslag tot en feit (commit) found in the Criminal Code. Method used in this article is legal finding and law comparison. The author’s main finding is that these concepts had been wrongly translated into treason with all the consequence thereof.Therefore, correction of the translation should avoid injustice in the form of state reaction not proportional to the wrong doing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v4n3.a3
Asas Legalitas dalam Hukum Acara Pidana: Kritikan terhadap Putusan MK tentang Praperadilan Tristam P. Moeliono; Widati Wulandari
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 22 No. 4: Oktober 2015
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol22.iss4.art4

Abstract

The problem of this research is: how high is the authority of Constitutional Court to amend the provisions of criminal procedure law (KUHAP) by stating that some articles in KUHAP are not constitutional and expanding the authority of judges in pretrial forum. Since 2015, pretrial judges have authority to investigate and decide whether the determination of a suspect is legitimate. The research method was normative juridical. The result shows that Constitutional Court judges have actually replaced the position of lawmakers (legislator) and violated the principles of nullum iudicium sine lege. In relation to that, if the need is to improve the supervision mechanism for the use of coercion in investigations, lawmakers should amend KUHAP or introduce better supervision mechanism for investigators..
Tindakan Doxing Di Media Sosial Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 TAHUN 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik Dikaitkan Dengan Konsep Perlindungan Privasi Dinda Salsabila; Sinta Dewi; Widati Wulandari
Qiyas : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Peradilan Vol 8, No 1 (2023): APRIL
Publisher : UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/qys.v8i1.10332

Abstract

Abstract: There is a phenomenon on the internet called doxing or the act of publishing private information about someone on the internet, typically with malicious intent. Doxing act violates people rights of their privacy of personal data. Not only with malicious intent, doxing act often carried out by victims of crime to seek justice. This study aims to determine the application of the protection of personal data principals from doxing act in ITE Law and to identify the legal liability of doxing actions on social media that is carried out by victims of crime in related to the concept of privacy protection.This research was conducted using normative juridical approach and descriptive analytical research specifications, namely by describing the issue with the phenomenon being studied as the research object, in this case doxing act, and then reviewed with secondary data. The data analysis was carried out using a qualitative juridical method.The results of the study show that in the ITE Law, the protection of personal data from doxing act can be found in Article 26 (1) regarding the consent to disclose personal data, Article 27 (1), (3), and (4) regarding to the content of personal data that is disclosed, and Article 30 (2) regarding to the method in obtaining the content or personal data that is disclosed. Doxing actions on social media carried out by victims of crime to seek justice in the concept of privacy protection can be held legally responsible under the ITE Law Article 26 by filing a lawsuit, criminal sanctions and fines based on Article 45 (1), (3), and (4) and Article 46 (2), or administrative sanctions based on the Ministry of Communication and Informatics Regulation No. 20 of 2016 Article 36 such as verbal and written warnings, temporary suspension of activities and/or announcements on online websites. Keywords: Privacy and Personal Data Protection, Doxing, Legal Liability
MODEL PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP CRACKER PADA SISTEM ELEKTRONIK MILIK PEMERINTAH DIKAITKAN DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG INFORMASI TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK Abdu Rahman; Widati Wulandari; Nella Sumika Putri
EKSEKUSI Vol 5, No 1 (2023): Eksekusi : Journal Of Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/je.v5i1.21629

Abstract

AbstractThe crackers in the Indonesian government's electronic system are very disserve on utilizing information technology and realizing the welfare. This article aims to analyze criminal law enforcement model against crackers on government electronic system related with electronic information and transaction law. The research method used is normative legal research. The results shown that the enforcement of law, especially crackers on government electronic system in the ITE Law in Indonesia, which has not materialized the idea of legal certainty as a basic value in Indonesian society and legal purposes. The criminal law enforcement model against crackers on government electronic system must refer to the ITE Law by using the law triad purpose theory based on causal priorities, not only legal certainty is achieved, but also justice and expediency. Countermeasures it can be done through preventive action as a non-penal.Keywords:Law Enforcement, Cracker, Government Electronic System, Ite Law AbstrakKejahatan yang dilakukan oleh cracker pada sistem elektronik milik pemerintah Indonesia sangat merugikan pemerintah, terutama dalam pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dan mewujudkan kesejahteraan masyarakat Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis model penegakan hukum pidana terhadap cracker pada sistem elektronik milik pemerintah. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa penegakan pengaturan tersebut khususnya tentang cracker pada sistem elektronik milik pemerintah dalam UU ITE di Indonesia yang ada selama ini belum mewujudkan ide kepastian hukum sebagai nilai-nilai dasar dalam masyarakat Indonesia dan tujuan hukum. Model penegakan hukum pidana tentang cracker pada sistem elektronik milik pemerintah harus mengacu pada pengaturan dalam UU ITE dengan menggunakan teori tujuan hukum berdasarkan prioritas kasuistik agar tidak hanya tercapainya kepastian hukum, tapi juga keadilan dan kemanfaatan secara bersamaan. Upaya penanggulangannya dapat dilakukan melalui tindakan preventif sebagai upaya non penal.Kata kunci: Penegakan Hukum, cracker, Sistem Elektronik Pemerintah, UU ITE
IMPARSIALITAS KEJAKSAAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PIDANA DI LUAR PENGADILAN MELALUI MEDIASI PENAL Sara, Yuni; Wulandari, Widati; Chandra, Erika Magdalena
Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi Vol 12, No 2 (2024): Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi
Publisher : Universitas Galuh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25157/justisi.v12i2.13467

Abstract

Adanya kewenangan melaksanakan penuntutan tersebut sejatinya menjadikan Kejaksaan sebagai lembaga yang parsial untuk mewakili kepentingan korban tindak pidana atau negara, sementara itu, Kejaksaan bertujuan untuk menjatuhkan nestapa pada pelaku tindak pidana. Penghukuman pelaku tindak pidana merupakan prestasi bagi Kejaksaan. Pada akhirnya, kewenangan dalam melakukan penuntutan tersebut menjadi tidak sejalan dengan prinsip-prinsip yang ditekankan dalam mediasi penal yang pada pokoknya menuntut imparsialitas dan profesionalitas dalam penyelenggaraannya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji penerapan mediasi penal yang memenuhi asas imparsial selaku mediator sekalipun berfungsi pula sebagai penuntut dalam sistem penanganan perkara pidana. Metode Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif yang didukung dengan data sekunder dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konsep dan pendekatan kasus. Data yang digunakan adalah data primer dan data sekunder yang selanjutnya akan dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini adalah Penerapan mediasi penal oleh Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia dapat dilakukan apabila memenuhi syarat sebagaimana yang diatur dalam Perja 15 Tahun 2020. Dalam pelaksanaan mediasi penal, apabila dilihat dari teori pemidanaan maka tujuan pemidanaan yang bersifat pembalasan dan /atau pencegahan telah mengalami perkembangan, dimana tujuan dari pelaksanaan mediasi penal adalah memperbaiki diri pelaku dan memulihkan hak korban. Selanjutnya, Imparsialitas dari kewenangan Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia sebagai mediator pada perkara pidana telah merubah posisi jaksa sebagai penuntut umum dalam sistem peradilan pidana yang merepresentasikan kepentingan korban kejahatan. Hal ini terjadi dikarenakan kejaksaan juga bertanggung jawab untuk mengefektifkan proses penegakan hukum dengan memperhatikan asas peradilan cepat, sederhana, dan biaya ringan secara independen demi keadilan berdasarkan hukum dan hati Nurani.
HATE CRIMES DI INDONESIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF PERBANDINGAN HUKUM Wulandari, Widati
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 3 No. 1 (2017): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v3i1.2525

Abstract

This article discusses the deficiency of the Indonesian criminal law with regard to the criminalization of hate crimes. Taking into consideration the fact that Indonesia faces a high incidence of social conflict due to rising intolerance and discrimination targeting minority groups.  The combination of (racial-ethnic-religious) discrimination and hatred against minority groups in most cases results in various forms of common crimes which generally is known as hate crimes. Using a comparative law method, by and between Indonesian criminal law and the criminal law of other countries experiencing hate crimes, the author highlights options for eradicating hate crimes. One important finding is the tendency of a number of countries to perceive hatred or prejudice which motivate the perpetrator of hate crimes as aggravating factor and not to as as separate substantive offence.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi: Dampaknya terhadap Perubahan Undang-Undang dan Penegakan Hukum Pidana Wulandari, Widati; Putri, Nella Sumika; Sulistyani, Wanodyo; Chandra, Erika Magdalena
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 18 No. 3 (2021)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (402.748 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1831

Abstract

Constitutional Court verdict have big impact for laws development including criminal law. In criminal law, the verdict caused change in norm both arranged inside Criminal Law Code and outside Criminal Law Code. Futhermore, this issue is interesting to study when it is connected with expansion authority of Constitutional Court from negative legislator to positive legislator. Constitutional Court verdict form as ‘conditional’ verdict either constitutional or conditional inconstitutional are example of the transformed Constitutional Court authority from negative legislator to positive legislator. As known, criminal law is basing on legality principle. Thus, the verdict especially ‘conditional’ verdict raises polemic in its implementation because not all the verdict can be followed by changing criminal law formally. This situation can inflict various difference in criminal law enforcement. Constitutional Court verdict evoke changing criminal law norm by decriminalization, depenalisation, offense transformation or interpretation criminal law elements that impact on material criminal law or formal criminal law. Without any follow up by changing criminal legislation, espesially when it is related with legalty principle, law enforcement officer can rule out Constitutional Court verdict. The inconsistency of law enforcement can provoke law uncertainty and violate citizen rights