Khairuddin
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Sertifikasi Halal di MUI Lampung Pasca Undang -Undang Nomor 34 Tahun 2014 Serta Problematika UMKM Aliyudin Aliyudin; Khoirul Abror; Khairuddin Khairuddin; Abdurrahman Hilabi
Al Maal: Journal of Islamic Economics and Banking Vol 3, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Prodi Perbankan Syariah FAI UMT

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31000/almaal.v3i2.5459

Abstract

This research was conducted by focusing on the problem; what is the obligation for halal certification before and before the enactment of Law No. 34 of 2014?, how is the implementation of halal product certification by an institution that is proven in this case BPJPH?, and what is the role of MUI in implementing halal certification?, obstacles and legal impacts of halal certification obligations?. This research is a normative juridical research with qualitative descriptive method. As a result, MUI has the right to issue Halal letters, which is the basis for issuing halal certificates by BPJPH, besides that MUI has other functions regulated by law which at the same time strengthens the legitimacy of halal certificates. The impact is that halal certificates provide added value for UMKM products, but the costs and socialization that are still minimal are an obstacle for UMKM that are still developing
PATTERN OF TRANSFORMATION OF DSN-MUI FATWA REGARDING MUSYARAKAH MUTANAQISAH CONTRACTS IN LEGISLATION (DSN-MUI FATWA ANALYSIS NUMBER: 01/DSN-MUI/X/2013): Pola Tansformasi Fatwa DSN-MUI Tentang Akad Musyarakah Mutanaqisah Dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan (Analisis Fatwa DSN-Mui Nomor: 01/DSN-MUI/X/2013) WAHYU NITA SARI; Khumedi Ja’far; Khairuddin
AL-BAYAN: JURNAL HUKUM DAN EKONOMI ISLAM Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): DESEMBER 2021
Publisher : Jurnal ini dipublikasikan oleh Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Publikasi (P3M) STAI Nahdlatul Watan Samawa-licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (729.192 KB)

Abstract

Departing from the growing assumption that there is a change between the provisions of the DSN-MUI fatwa and the POJK regarding the purpose of musyarakah mutanaqishah financing, namely from productive to consumptive. musyarakah mutanaqishah must be aimed at financing with productive characteristics such as working capital, consumptive purposes such as mortgage financing. Because of this, several perceptions have emerged in the public which say that there is a discrepancy between the fatwa and the laws and regulations. Therefore, the research is directed to see how the pattern of transformation of the DSN-MUI Fatwa regarding the Musyarakah Mutanaqishah Agreement on the Legislation. The results of this study found that the transformation pattern here can be classified into two; literally and non-literally. literal use of positivization and copy paste methods, and non literal method of objectification with adoption and adaptation patterns Literally and Islamic law (DSN-MUI fatwa) does not have to be literally transformed into laws and regulations. The results of this study found that the problem, especially the transformation caused by the positivization pattern of the fatwa that was not appropriate, was partially adopted and implemented. The content mostly uses the same concepts as conventional ones. As for the substance of the problems caused by the habit of taking fatwas that are not complete (partial only) and there are new fatwas that elaborate on old concepts.
Reconstructing Children’s Maintenance In Islamic Family Law: Rethinking The Free Nutritious Meal Program As A Shared Welfare Responsibility Durga Ramdhani; Rudi Santoso; Khairuddin Khairuddin
Jurnal El-Thawalib Vol 7, No 5 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/el-thawalib.v7i5.21202

Abstract

This article reconstructs the legal relationship between parental maintenance and state responsibility for children's nutritional rights through Indonesia's Free Nutritious Meal Program (Makan Bergizi Gratis/MBG). Recent studies already recognize complementarity between MBG and parental support; this study develops that proposition into differentiated rules on obligations, service standards, and accountability. It employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and Islamic legal approaches. The analysis distinguishes the juridical-personal obligation of maintenance from the material-functional provision of nutrition. Parents retain their respective family-law duties, including the father's financial responsibility under the applicable provisions, while MBG provides a public nutritional service. Public provision does not automatically discharge maintenance or authorize unilateral deductions from an existing award. The proposed Complementary-Guarantee Responsibility Model connects family responsibility, program-specific standards, and wider protective intervention when children's needs remain unmet. Its evaluative criteria translate ḥifẓ al-nafs, ḥifẓ al-ʿaql, ḥifẓ al-nasl, ḥifẓ al-māl, maṣlaḥah, and substantive justice into identifiable duties, indicators, and corrective responses. The guarantee is a normative reconstruction grounded in existing law, not a claim that MBG already creates an unlimited, judicially enforceable entitlement to complete daily nutrition. The study contributes operational boundaries for shared welfare responsibility while acknowledging that household responses and program outcomes require empirical investigation.
Reconstructing Children’s Maintenance In Islamic Family Law: Rethinking The Free Nutritious Meal Program As A Shared Welfare Responsibility Durga Ramdhani; Rudi Santoso; Khairuddin Khairuddin
Jurnal El-Thawalib Vol 7, No 5 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/el-thawalib.v7i5.21202

Abstract

This article reconstructs the legal relationship between parental maintenance and state responsibility for children's nutritional rights through Indonesia's Free Nutritious Meal Program (Makan Bergizi Gratis/MBG). Recent studies already recognize complementarity between MBG and parental support; this study develops that proposition into differentiated rules on obligations, service standards, and accountability. It employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and Islamic legal approaches. The analysis distinguishes the juridical-personal obligation of maintenance from the material-functional provision of nutrition. Parents retain their respective family-law duties, including the father's financial responsibility under the applicable provisions, while MBG provides a public nutritional service. Public provision does not automatically discharge maintenance or authorize unilateral deductions from an existing award. The proposed Complementary-Guarantee Responsibility Model connects family responsibility, program-specific standards, and wider protective intervention when children's needs remain unmet. Its evaluative criteria translate ḥifẓ al-nafs, ḥifẓ al-ʿaql, ḥifẓ al-nasl, ḥifẓ al-māl, maṣlaḥah, and substantive justice into identifiable duties, indicators, and corrective responses. The guarantee is a normative reconstruction grounded in existing law, not a claim that MBG already creates an unlimited, judicially enforceable entitlement to complete daily nutrition. The study contributes operational boundaries for shared welfare responsibility while acknowledging that household responses and program outcomes require empirical investigation.