Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada
Adery Ardhan Saputro, Adery Ardhan
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
KONSEPSI RECHTERLIJK PARDON ATAU PEMAAFAN HAKIM DALAM RANCANGAN KUHP Adery Ardhan Saputro
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 28, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (409.814 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.15867

Abstract

The conception of Non-Imposing of a Penalty/Rechterlijk Pardon/dispensa de pena was unregulated in KUHP (Indonesia penal code). Conceptually, Rechterlijk Pardon is a modified form of “rigid legal certainty” to “flexible legal certainty”. This paradigm of Rechterlijk Pardon is based on from several cases that’s case have proven to commited crime, but his crimes are not feasible imposed a penalty. To respond the problem, RKUHP have created a new regulation (Judicial pardon), that’s judge may determine in the judgement no punishment, where he deems this case not proper to imposed a penalty. Konsepsi Non-Imposing of a Penalty/Rechterlijk Pardon/dispensa de pena merupakan suatu lembaga baru yang belum dikenal pada KUHP saat ini. Secara konseptual Rechterlijk Pardon merupakan bentuk dari modifikasi atas kepastian hukum yang bersifat kaku, menuju kepastian hukum yang bersifat fleksibel. Hal ini berangkat dari beberapa perkara yang sebenarnya telah memenuhi rumusan delik tindak pidana, namun perbuatannya tidak layak untuk dijatuhkan pemidanaan. Merespon masalah tersebut, RKUHP membuat suatu rumusan baru dengan mengatur dimungkinkannya pemaafan hakim terhadap beberapa perkara yang tidak layak dijatuhkan pemidanaan.
Menilik Peran Jaksa dalam Pengentasan Persoalan Overcrowding di Indonesia Saputro, Adery Ardhan; Weriansyah, Aditya
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v10i8.61566

Abstract

The overcrowding of inmates in correctional institutions has raised Indonesia's ranking as one of the top ten countries in the world that have problems related to overcrowding. At least we can examine this phenomenon from 2 (two) points of view, namely overcrowding as a logical consequence of the high number of cases that enter the court (overloaded) and the high number of cases sentenced to prison. This paper aims to analyze the role of the Prosecutor's Office in overcoming the problem of overcrowding. The research uses a doctrinal research method with a qualitative approach through literature studies and legal comparisons. The results of the study show that against the phenomenon of overcrowding, the Prosecutor's Office has a central role to screen cases that can enter the court stage through the implementation of criminal case settlement outside the court even though the current legal framework is very limited. In addition, the Prosecutor's Office also has a central role in determining changes in sentencing policies in order to popularize the criminal justice system through the imposition of the charges that are prepared.
Co-Authors Aulia Ali Reza, Aulia Ali Choky Risda Ramadhan, Choky Risda Evandri G. Pantouw, Evandri G. Fransiscus Manurung, Fransiscus Weriansyah, Aditya