Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search
Journal : academia open

Policy development Urban Street Vendors in Sidoarjo Post-Reformation : Perkembangan Kebijakan Tata Kelola Pedagang Kaki Lima di Sidoarjo Pasca Reformasi Moch. Ichyak Ulumuddin; Rifqi Ridlo Phahlevy
Academia Open Vol. 3 (2020): December
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/acopen.3.2020.566

Abstract

The Government of Sidoarjo Regency in establishing policies regarding the arrangement of Street Vendors (PKL) aims to create a clean, orderly and beautiful Sidoarjo Regency and continue to empower existing street vendors. The spatial planning policy implemented by the Sidoarjo Regency Government is aimed at maintaining and structuring a more orderly and orderly spatial location without ignoring the existence of street vendors who aim to improve the economy of their families. This study aims to find out how the Sidoarjo Regency Government's policy in structuring street vendors (PKL) based on traders, order and beauty, this study uses descriptive research methods using a qualitative approach. The results of the study indicate that the PKL structuring policy is closely related to the plan to create a clean, orderly, safe, and comfortable city spatial plan. So that in its formulation, an alternative policy that is aware of the environment is needed. The government of Sidoarjo Regency so far has made significant efforts in structuring street vendors in the Sidoarjo Regency area and to overcome and anticipate the impacts. The implementation of the street vendor management policy (PKL) based on the Sidoarjo Regional Regulation No. 3 of 2016 concerning the arrangement and empowerment of street vendors has been running but has not been effective, such as the resistance that occurs when the implementation of the PKL arrangement takes place, it should be able to be overcome if the Sidoarjo Regency Government is responsive enough to various demands from street vendors.
Non-compliance with the Constitutional Court's Decision from the Perspective of Constitutional Law : Ketidakpatuhan terhadap PutusanMahkamah Konstitusi dari Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara Narwoko; Rifqi Ridlo Phahlevy; Abdul Fatah
Academia Open Vol. 6 (2022): June
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/acopen.6.2022.677

Abstract

This study aims to determine the forms of non-compliance with the Constitutional Court Decision regarding Manpower and to find a constitutional solution to the problem of non-compliance with the Constitutional Court Decision regarding Manpower.This research is a juridicial normative study using a statutory, case, and conseptual approach.Using legal materials in the form of a Constitutional Court Decision related to Manpower.From the research results, it can be concluded that the Constitutional Court Decision regarding Manpower are not obeyed by the adressats. Various forms of non-compliance with the Constitutional Court Decision regarding Manpower-related Laws were not followed up and partially fulfilled in the form of government policies such as the Regulation of Minister of Manpower, Circular of the Minister of Manpower. Some laws are in the legislative process. The constitutional solution that has the potential to realized for non-compliance with the Constitutional Court Decision is the implementation of the concept of judicial order, judicial defferal, and imposition of sanctions.
Household Waste Management Policy in Sidoarjo Regency Post Presidential Decree Number 97 of 2017 in Indonesia: Kebijakan Pengelolaan Sampah Rumah Tangga Di Kabupaten Sidoarjo Pasca Perpres Nomor 97 Tahun 2017 di Indonesia Kevin Garnida Putra; Rifqi Ridlo Phahlevy
Academia Open Vol. 3 (2020): December
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/acopen.3.2020.733

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether Perbup Number 100 of 2018 concerning policies and strategies for Sidoarjo Regency in managing household waste and similar household waste is in line with Presidential Regulation Number 97 of 2017 concerning national policies and strategies for managing household waste and other types of household waste in Indonesia. Sidoarjo Regency and to assess the technical suitability of waste processing in Sidoarjo Regency with Perbup Number 100 of 2018 Sidoarjo Regency policies and strategies in managing household waste and waste similar to household waste. This research was conducted at the Berkah Abadi Waste Bank and Telulikur Garbage Bank. The type of this research is socio-legal with a statute approach. The results of this study state that Perbup Number 100 of 2018 concerning policies and strategies for Sidoarjo Regency in managing household waste and waste similar to household waste is in line with Presidential Regulation Number 97 of 2017 concerning national policies and strategies for managing household waste and other types of household waste in Indonesia. Sidoarjo Regency and technical waste processing in both waste banks are in accordance with Perbup Number 100 of 2018 Sidoarjo Regency policies and strategies in managing household waste and waste similar to household waste. Keywords: Waste bank, Regent Regulation, Presidential Regulation
Constitutional Court Rulings on Electoral Thresholds in Indonesia: Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tentang Ambang Batas Pemilihan di Indonesia Muhammad Mirza Faldinan Azharil; Rifqi Ridlo Phahlevy
Academia Open Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/acopen.10.2025.11940

Abstract

General Background: Electoral thresholds constitute a central feature of Indonesia’s electoral system, shaping candidate nomination and parliamentary representation within a presidential democracy. Specific Background: Since the post-reform era, regulations on presidential and parliamentary thresholds have repeatedly been reviewed by the Mahkamah Konstitusi, generating numerous rulings that define their constitutional status and legal interpretation. Knowledge Gap: Prior discussions tend to focus either on doctrinal justification or political consequences, leaving limited synthesis of how judicial decisions collectively construct the notion of open legal policy in electoral governance. Aims: This study analyzes the trajectory of Constitutional Court rulings on presidential and electoral thresholds from 2004 to 2024 to identify patterns of reasoning, consistency, and constitutional framing. Results: Examination of 24 decisions demonstrates that the Court has consistently upheld threshold provisions as constitutionally permissible under legislative discretion, despite recurring claims that they restrict political participation and candidate diversity. Novelty: The research offers an integrated juridical assessment that maps long-term judicial continuity while situating thresholds within debates on participatory democracy and constitutional interpretation. Implications: These findings clarify the legal foundations of threshold regulations and provide a reference for policymakers, scholars, and reform advocates assessing the balance between electoral stability and inclusive democratic competition in Indonesia. Highlights: Judicial reasoning repeatedly affirms legislative discretion in setting nomination requirements. Legal challenges frequently fail due to issues of standing rather than substantive review. Ongoing controversy reflects tension between stability considerations and broader candidate access. Keywords:Constitutional Court; Electoral Threshold; Presidential Threshold; Open Legal Policy; Participatory Democracy
Sentencing Disparity in Military Court Indecency Cases Surabaya: Ketidakadilan dalam Penetapan Hukuman pada Kasus Ketidaksenonohan di Pengadilan Militer Surabaya Saiful Hariyanto; Rifqi Ridlo Phahlevy
Academia Open Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/acopen.10.2025.12192

Abstract

General Background Sentencing disparity is a persistent concern in criminal justice because unequal punishments for comparable offenses raise questions about fairness, proportionality, and legal certainty, including within military jurisdictions. Specific Background In the Indonesian military context, cases of indecency committed by members of the armed forces against the Extended TNI Family (KBT) fall under military court authority, where sanctions may include imprisonment and dismissal from service. Knowledge Gap Despite existing regulations and internal directives governing moral violations, limited research has systematically examined patterns of inconsistent sentencing and the judicial considerations underlying such differences in Military Court III Surabaya. Aims This study analyzes patterns of sentencing disparity and identifies factors shaping judicial reasoning in indecency cases involving TNI personnel against KBT within this jurisdiction. Results Normative legal analysis of four decisions shows variations in principal and additional punishments, including increases, reductions, consistency across appellate levels, and cases without dismissal due to prior discharge, reflecting differing emphases on retributive, corrective, and rehabilitative justice. Novelty The study provides a focused comparative examination of multiple case trajectories within a single military court region while assessing the application of internal TNI regulations and judicial discretion. Implications The findings indicate a need for clearer sentencing guidelines to ensure consistency, strengthen legal certainty, and maintain confidence in military justice processes. Highlights: Comparable misconduct received unequal prison terms and administrative sanctions across cases. Appellate review sometimes altered punishments while other cases remained unchanged through all levels. Judicial reasoning reflected different orientations toward punishment philosophies and case-specific conditions. Keywords:Sentencing Disparity; Military Court; Indecency Offense; TNI Personnel; Legal Consistency
Muhammadiyah Advocacy Jihad Expands Access to Justice for Vulnerable Communities: Muhammadiyah Advocacy Jihad Memperluas Akses Keadilan bagi Komunitas Rentan Ratna Sabilla; Rifqi Ridlo Phahlevy
Academia Open Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/acopen.10.2025.12768

Abstract

General Background: Indonesia upholds justice, equality, and human rights protection; however, unequal legal access persists among vulnerable communities. Specific Background: Muhammadiyah addresses this issue through Advocacy Jihad, providing structured legal assistance and community-based legal empowerment. Knowledge Gap: Limited studies examine the operational mechanisms of Advocacy Jihad within empirical juridical and sociolegal perspectives, particularly regarding integrated litigation and community legal services. Aims: This study analyzes the forms and implementation of Advocacy Jihad in law enforcement and public legal awareness. Results: Using empirical juridical and qualitative sociolegal methods based on interviews with Muhammadiyah Legal Aid Institute administrators, findings show implementation through litigation and non-litigation assistance, legal counseling, paralegal training, and law-based community organizing. Collaboration with Aisyiyah and Pemuda Muhammadiyah expands justice access, strengthens legal literacy, supports community legal culture, and encourages regionally responsive policies. Novelty: The study presents Advocacy Jihad as an integrated legal assistance model combining progressive Islamic values with organized social advocacy. Implications: Advocacy Jihad represents a legal resolution strategy and transformative da’wah movement contributing to law enforcement and community-based legal empowerment. Highlights: Integrated Litigation and Community-Based Legal Assistance Programs Support Marginalized Populations. Institutional Collaboration Strengthens Public Legal Literacy and Collective Legal Awareness. Regional Regulatory Development Reflects Community-Oriented Policy Responsiveness. Keywords: Muhammadiyah Advocacy Jihad, Access to Justice, Legal Empowerment, Sociolegal Movement, Law Enforcement Indonesia
Co-Authors ., Maghfiroh Abdul Fatah Abdurahman Abdurrahman Afianto, Bagus Aidul Fitriciada Azhari Aji Pangestu Akhmad, Fandi al-akbar, Wildan Aldianto, Muchammad Yusuf Alif , Muhammad Wildan Amelya, Anggita Diva Amien, Muhammad Najmy Archintya, Noviana Asnawi, Minan Zuhri Assidiqin, Muhammad Yusuf Fanany Azhar, Lucilia Azhar, Lucilia Riska Bimantara, Arya Dewi, Citra Surya Effendi, Muhammad Imam Emy Rosnawati Faizin, Moh Fiddina, Irta Firmansyah, Febrian Dwi Habibulloh, Rizal Bagus Hakim, Achmad Luqman Hasmara, Shilla Huzairin, Regita Amanah Ibrahim, Danie Ilmi Usrotin Choiriyah Imam, Syafarul Intan Azizah Tuz Zuhriyah Iqbal Purwo Nugroho Ira Sanjaya Irta Fiddina Kevin Garnida Putra Lindi Rohma Octavia Mawa, Damai Yanti Zulfatal Mayasari, Sephia Melanie Merliya Cahyo Moch Rifqi Tamaputra Moch. Ichyak Ulumuddin Mochammad Tanzil Multazam Muhammad Ary Taufik Muhammad Mirza Faldinan Azharil Muhammad Rafii Muhammad Rico Irfansyah Nada, Dewi Kusuma Narwoko Ni’mah, Mufidatun Nola Hananda Agnesia Noor Fatimah Mediawati Permatasari, Eka Yuni Prasetyo, Andika Bujang Pratama, Angga Ariesandy Putra Pratama, Candra Surya Purnama, Melati Indah Putra, Anggi Fitratama Rianto Rahadi, Muhammad Rendy Rahardi, M. Rendy Rahma, Anita Rizkia Ratna Sabilla Reno Arby Faniansa Rizti Nurizka Esa Safari, Ferdi Safitri, Sifa' Ulya Said Fitra Akbar Saiful Hariyanto Sari, Ana Firda Sari, Rizqi Puspita Septia, Andien Siti Musdalifa Sri Budi Purwaningsih Stefany, Inge Bethzeda Taqi, Shofi Mauline Athaliah Utomo, Agung Ridzal Wisnu, Ido Wulandari, Shofia Eka Putri Zidane Heri Saputra