Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.349
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Justitia et Pax Jambura Law Review Jurnal Yuridis Jurnal Yudisial SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Jurnal Yustitia IBLAM Law Review Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Law & Pass : International Journal of Law, Public Administration and Social Studies Humaniorum Journal Journal of Law PESHUM
Hapsoro, Fakhris Lutfianto
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum IBLAM
Humanities Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
DINAMIKA PENGGUNAAN AMBANG BATAS PRESIDEN DALAM SISTEMPRESIDENSIAL DI INDONESIA Hapsoro, Fakhris Lutfianto; Ismail
Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 19 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v19i1.742

Abstract

This study examines the regulatory framework and legal dynamics of the presidential threshold in Indonesian electoral law, focusing on Judgment Number 62/PUU-XXII/2024 of the Constitutional Court, which declared the presidential threshold provision unconstitutional. The Constitutional Court held that applying the presidential threshold exceeded the permissible limits of the open legal policy doctrine, especially regarding democratic morality, rationality, and justice. This research analyses the doctrinal evolution of the presidential threshold as reflected in the judgment and evaluates its implications for the presidential system. The study uses a normative juridical method, employing case, statutory, and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that, procedurally, the Constitutional Court expanded legal standing beyond citizens with the right to be elected to include those with the right to vote. Substantively, the Constitutional Court determined that the presidential threshold—previously classified as an open legal policy—violates the doctrine's internal limits. It is inconsistent with democratic morality, policy rationality, and the principle of justice, making it unconstitutional. The abolition of the presidential threshold has significant implications for the presidential system, especially in enhancing the inclusiveness of political rights and creating opportunities to strengthen the institutionalisation of political parties. However, it also raises challenges related to governmental consolidation and political stability. Therefore, strengthening the role and institutional capacity of political parties is essential to advancing a more representative, accountable, and sustainable democratic system.
Co-Authors Ade Lita Al Karim, Habib Musa Ali Abdurahman Cahyo, Cahyo Fikrotul Jadidah Haldiansyah, Raden Moch Fabian Hendra Wahanu Prabandani Ismail Ismail Ismail Ismail Ismail Karli Khilmatin Maulidah Maulidah Listianingrum, Linda Muhammad Khoerul Umam Muhammad Ragil Wicaksono Muhammad Wendra Rofiqi, Moh. Hasbi Sodik, Rozy Brilian Supriyanto Susi Dwi Harijanti