Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : software engineering in computing systems

Success Factors of Government Digital Applications in Public Service Delivery: A Systematic Literature Review Rifqi Fahrudin; Zainal Arifin Hasibuan; Bobby Kurniawan; Sri Supatmi
Software Engineering in Computing Systems Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): May: Software Engineering in Computing Systems
Publisher : Asosiasi Pengelola Jurnal Informatika dan Komputer Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66472/secons.v1i2.395

Abstract

The rapid development of digital government applications has significantly transformed public service delivery; however, their success remains inconsistent due to the complexity of multiple influencing factors. Many government digital systems experience low adoption, usability challenges, and limited impact on service quality, indicating the need for a comprehensive understanding of the determinants of success. This study aims to identify and synthesize the critical success factors of government digital applications in public service delivery. To achieve this objective, a systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted using the Scopus database, applying a predefined search strategy and PRISMA-based screening process. From an initial set of 176 articles, 44 relevant studies were selected and analyzed using a coding framework to classify success factors into four dimensions: technological, organizational, user, and governance. The results show that digital government success is inherently multidimensional, with user-related factors such as trust, usability, and satisfaction emerging as the most dominant, while technological factors function as enabling components and organizational and governance factors ensure sustainability and effectiveness. Furthermore, the findings reveal significant research gaps, particularly the lack of integrated frameworks and the fragmented treatment of success factors in existing studies. This study concludes by proposing an integrated classification framework that provides a comprehensive understanding of digital government success and offers practical guidance for policymakers in designing more effective and sustainable digital public services.
The Integration Of Non-Academic Variables In Student Risk Assessment: A Conceptual Framework Hani Irmayanti; Eddy Soeryanto Soegoto; Hidayat Hidayat; Rio Yunanto; Zainal Arifin Hasibuan; Sri Supatmi
Software Engineering in Computing Systems Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): May: Software Engineering in Computing Systems
Publisher : Asosiasi Pengelola Jurnal Informatika dan Komputer Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66472/secons.v1i2.435

Abstract

Students’ success in completing their studies on time is a vital indicator of the quality of higher education management in Indonesia. However, high dropout rates pose a major challenge, often caused by institutions’ failure to detect warning signs of academic failure in a timely manner. The main issue lies in the current evaluation approach, which is reactive and limited to conventional academic indicators such as the Grade Point Average (GPA), thereby neglecting the psychosocial factors that influence performance. This study aims to develop a more comprehensive conceptual framework for the early detection of academic failure risk by integrating academic and non-academic dimensions. The methodology used is adapted from the Design Science Research Methodology (DSRM), focusing on the stages from problem identification to the design of the model artifact. The proposed approach is a hybrid model that combines traditional academic variables with non-academic variables, including psychological stress levels, self-efficacy, and social support. The design results indicate that this framework is capable of identifying “latent pressure” as a leading indicator of failure before a decline in academic performance occurs. The synthesis of this study confirms that the integration of non-academic variables enhances the model’s transparency and provides a more meaningful and targeted interpretation of risk factors. In conclusion, this framework provides a theoretical foundation for educational institutions to transition from reactive evaluation to a system of personalized, proactive interventions. The implementation of this model is expected to improve student retention through earlier and more targeted risk mitigation.