Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

Kebijakan Telemudik Bentuk Perlindungan Negara Pada Masyarakat Menuju New Normal Ditengah Pendemi Corona Amalia Syauket; Bambang Karsono; Dwi Atmoko
Jurnal Kajian Ilmiah Vol. 22 No. 1 (2022): January 2022
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian, Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat dan Publikasi (LPPMP)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/g4ye9938

Abstract

The number of people who have died from COVID-19 has also continued to increase, as has the number of people infected with the Corona virus (Covid-19). Until May 2021, which coincides with the Eid al-Fitr 1442 H, which is the custom of the people of Jakarta, to go home to stay in touch with family in the area. At that time, Jakarta was still in the red zone due to the spike in the spread of Covid-19 cases. The state, in this case the Government, must be present to protect its people, both those infected with COVID-19 and so that they are not infected with Covid-19. This protection is in the form of the issuance of a regulation in the form of a Covid-19 Handling Task Force Circular Number 13 of 2021 concerning the Elimination of Homecoming for Eid Al-Fitri in 1442 Hijri and efforts to control the spread of Covid-19 during the holy month of Ramadan 1442 Hijri to change the ignorance of the people towards the Covid-19 pandemic. This study uses a qualitative approach by prioritizing secondary data, to find out the background of the issuance of the telemudik policy. The conclusion drawn from this literature research is that the background behind the birth of the telemudik policy is the ignorance of the community towards the covid pandemic itself. The right solution for carrying out homecoming during the Covid-19 pandemic is telemudik not to reduce the essence of friendship and sharing and prepare the community for the New Normal. in the midst of the Corona pandemic.
Transformational vs Transactional Leadership and Organizational Ambidexterity for Innovation : A Systematic Literature Review: Kepemimpinan Transformasional vs Transaksional dan Ambidexteritas Organisasi untuk Inovasi : Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis Gerson Manurung; Bambang Karsono; Tri Widyastuti
Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi Vol 4 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi
Publisher : OGZ Research & Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61597/jbe-ogzrp.v4i1.171

Abstract

Objective : This study aims to analyze and compare the influence of Transformational Leadership (TL) and Transactional Leadership (TR) on organizational innovation and ambidexterity (exploration and exploitation) in the digital era.   Methods : Using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) guided by the PRISMA 2020 framework, this research reviewed 42 scholarly articles published between 2015 and 2025 from databases including Scopus, Web of Science, SAGE, and ScienceDirect. Results : The results indicate that transformational leadership supports explorative innovation, while transactional leadership strengthens exploitative innovation. Together, they create organizational ambidexterity that enables sustainable innovation and adaptability in the digital era.
Servant Leadership: A Systematic Literature Review of Definitions, Measurement, and Its Effects on Employee Performance and Well-Being (2010–2025): Kepemimpinan Pelayan: Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis tentang Definisi, Pengukuran, dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Kinerja dan Kesejahteraan Karyawan (2010–2025) Faizal Rachman; Bambang Karsono; Tri Widyastuti
Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi Vol 4 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi
Publisher : OGZ Research & Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61597/jbe-ogzrp.v4i1.176

Abstract

Abstract : Servant leadership emphasizes prioritizing followers’ needs, moral values, and the development of individuals within organizations.   Objective: This systematic literature review explores theoretical advancements, measurement instruments, and empirical evidence of servant leadership from 2010 to 2025.   Methods: The analysis covers antecedents, mediating mechanisms, and organizational outcomes, including performance, well-being, and innovation.   Results: The review finds consistent evidence of positive relationships between servant leadership and job satisfaction, trust, and organizational citizenship behavior, mediated by psychological safety and meaningfulness. Practical and theoretical implications are discussed.
Comparison of The Katarungang Pambarangay System in The Philippines With The Concept of Restorative Justice in Indonesia in Community-Based Dispute Resolution Lusia Sulastri; Bambang Karsono; Carmelita B. Chavez; Mechelle C. Gempesao
KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Vol. 20 No. 2 (2026): KRTHA BHAYANGKARA: AUGUST 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v20i2.5481

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the comparison of dispute resolution mechanisms in the Katarungang Pambarangay system in the Philippines with the concept of restorative justice in Indonesia, as well as assess the effectiveness of both in resolving community disputes. This study uses normative legal methods with statutory approaches, conceptual approaches, and comparative approaches. The results of the study show that the Katarungang Pambarangay system regulated in Republic Act No. 7160 (Local Government Code of 1991) is a community-based mechanism that is mandatory and structured through the stages of mediation, conciliation, and arbitration by the Tagapamayapa Board. Meanwhile, restorative justice in Indonesia is an integrated approach in the formal criminal justice system based on Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Code, which is implemented through the authority to terminate investigations and prosecutions. In terms of effectiveness, both systems show positive results in dispute resolution. Katarungang Pambarangay has proven to be effective in increasing community participation and reducing the burden on the courts, while restorative justice in Indonesia has shown a significant increase in the number of case settlements, victim satisfaction, and the potential to suppress recidivism. The main difference lies in the nature of obligations and implementing actors, where the Philippines emphasizes the role of the community, while Indonesia relies on law enforcement officials. The study concludes that both systems have their advantages and that the integration between community-based approaches and state institutional support can be an ideal model for more effective and equitable dispute resolution.