Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Translating the Institutional Collective Action Framework to National Cybersecurity Governance: A Conceptual Review for Indonesia Juli Salamira; Dian Ferriswara; Amirul Mustofa
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): September: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greensocial.v3i3.345

Abstract

Tata kelola keamanan siber nasional membutuhkan koordinasi antar organisasi publik dan aktor infrastruktur kritis yang memiliki mandat, sumber daya, dan informasi yang berbeda, sekaligus menghadapi risiko lintas batas. Tinjauan konseptual ini mengkaji bagaimana kerangka Aksi Kolektif Institusional (ICA) dapat menjelaskan koordinasi antar organisasi dan pengawasan kebijakan parlemen di Indonesia. Studi ini menggunakan Tinjauan Literatur Naratif Berfokus Teori dengan sintesis teori kualitatif-interpretatif dan orientasi Teori-ke-Praktik. Scopus digunakan sebagai satu-satunya basis data untuk penemuan artikel jurnal. Enam kali pencarian yang didokumentasikan menghasilkan 745 catatan; setelah penghapusan duplikasi, penyaringan, prioritas, dan verifikasi teks lengkap, korpus analitis terdiri dari 35 artikel jurnal yang memenuhi syarat dan telah ditinjau oleh rekan sejawat yang dibaca secara lengkap. Sintesis tersebut merekonstruksi ICA sebagai kerangka kerja kontingensi yang menghubungkan otoritas yang terfragmentasi, eksternalitas, biaya transaksi, risiko kolaborasi, karakteristik masalah dan aktor, konteks kelembagaan, keterkaitan jaringan, mekanisme koordinasi, dan hasil kolektif. Aplikasi ICA langsung dibedakan dari bukti konteks keamanan siber, sementara kritik, kontradiksi, dan bukti kegagalan koordinasi dipertahankan. Kerangka kerja yang dihasilkan mencakup lima domain: mandat dan arsitektur saling ketergantungan; pertukaran informasi yang terlindungi; komitmen, kekuasaan, dan akuntabilitas yang kredibel; koordinasi yang sesuai dengan modus operandi dan kesiapan krisis; serta ketahanan jaringan, kapasitas, dan pembelajaran pengawasan. Tinjauan ini memberikan kontribusi konseptual dan translasional dengan menghubungkan mekanisme ICA yang terverifikasi dengan pertanyaan diagnostik yang dapat ditelusuri sumbernya dan opsi pengawasan terbatas untuk tata kelola keamanan siber nasional Indonesia. Karena tidak ada penelitian lapangan kelembagaan primer yang dilakukan, hubungan dan efektivitas praktis kerangka kerja tersebut memerlukan validasi empiris di Indonesia.
ANALYSIS OF DATA COLLECTION AND INVENTORY MANAGEMENT OF BENEFICIARIES IN IMPROVING THE ACCOUNTABILITY OF CHILD SOCIAL PROTECTION SERVICES AT UPT PPSAA SITUBONDO Mulyadin; Zainal Fatah; Amirul Mustofa
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Reseach Vol. 2 No. 5 (2026): Oktober
Publisher : International Journal of Multidisciplinary Reseach

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Management of data collection and beneficiary inventory plays a critical role in strengthening public accountability within child social protection services. This study aims to analyze the management of beneficiary data collection and inventory in enhancing accountability at the Technical Implementation Unit for Child Care Protection and Social Services (UPT PPSAA) Situbondo. The research adopts a qualitative approach with a descriptive-evaluative design. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with institutional officials, administrative staff, and social workers, as well as observation and documentation analysis of beneficiary databases and operational guidelines. The findings reveal that the implementation of data collection and inventory management at UPT PPSAA Situbondo has significantly improved administrative transparency and target accuracy. Key dimensions of administrative capacity including data collection standardization, verification mechanisms, digital inventory recording, and periodic audits directly contribute to financial and managerial accountability. However, challenges persist, such as limitations in real-time digital infrastructure, constraints in human resource technical training, and dynamic field-level demographic changes. This study concludes that structured, transparent, and technology-driven beneficiary inventory management is essential for optimizing child social protection services. Strengthening technical capacity and integrating cross-sectoral database networks are recommended to maintain long-term administrative accountability.
From Data Coordination to Convergent Action: Collaborative Governance for Subdistrict Stunting Prevention A Theory-to-Practice Conceptual Review Endi Iswandi; Eny Haryati; Amirul Mustofa
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): October: International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v3i4.1039

Abstract

Stunting prevention is a multisectoral public-administration problem in which formal mandates, fragmented authority, uneven capacity, and disputed or weakly used data can interrupt the conversion of coordination into joint action. This conceptual review examines how the Collaborative Governance Regime (CGR) can explain and guide that conversion at subdistrict level, using Sembakung Atulai, Nunukan Regency, Indonesia, as a bounded practical anchor. A Theory-Focused Narrative Literature Review with a Theory-to-Practice orientation was conducted using Scopus as the sole database. Five documented search runs yielded an analytical corpus of 38 verified full-text journal articles, comprising 18 theory-role and 20 application-role sources. Qualitative-interpretive synthesis reconstructed CGR's system context, drivers, collaborative dynamics, joint action, impacts, and adaptation; compared applications, criticisms, contradictory evidence, and rival explanations; and traced each practical domain to theory and full-text evidence. The synthesis identifies six governance domains: contextual mandate and interdependence architecture; trusted joint discovery and shared problem definition; inclusive deliberation, influence, and priority determination; commitment, authority, and multilevel alignment; mobilized joint-action capacity and coordinated implementation; and multilevel performance feedback, adaptation, and accountability. These domains form an eight-stage data-to-action cycle that distinguishes administrative activity from consequential joint action and separates process, action, output, outcome, equity, and population impact. The article contributes a conceptual and translational framework for diagnosing governance thresholds and designing context-sensitive decision artifacts. The framework has not been field-validated and does not establish that collaboration caused reductions in stunting.