Articles
<![CDATA[Konsep Putusan Pemaaf Oleh Hakim (Rechterlijk Pardon) Sebagai Jenis Putusan Baru Dalam KUHAP ]]>
<![CDATA[Alfret]]>;
<![CDATA[Mardian Putra Frans]]>
<![CDATA[ KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Vol. 17 No. 3 (2023): KRTHA BHAYANGKARA: DECEMBER 2023 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v17i3.790
<![CDATA[Of the various articles that have undergone changes and additions in the new Criminal Code, one of them is interesting, namely Article 54 related to forgiveness by judges. However, whether the concept of forgiveness decision by the judge in the new Criminal Code has a position as a decision in the Criminal Procedure Code or the Criminal Procedure Bill. This research uses a normative juridical research method, which examines the problem by referring to positive law. The results of this study indicate the need for additional types of forgiveness decisions in the Criminal Procedure Bill as a form of criminal law reform because the provisions related to the types of decisions in the Criminal Procedure Code and the Criminal Procedure Bill are currently unable to accommodate forgiving decisions by judges. By examining in more depth the concept of forgiveness by the judge, it will appear that neither the Criminal Procedure Code nor the Criminal Procedure Bill contains the type of forgiveness decision.]]>
<![CDATA[Plea Bargaining System, Deffered Prosecution Agreement, dan Judicial Scrutiny sebagai Upaya Mengatasi Overkapasitas Lembaga Pemasyarakatan ]]>
<![CDATA[Frans, Mardian Putra]]>;
<![CDATA[Intan Sari, Agustina Indah]]>;
<![CDATA[Winda, Darisa]]>;
<![CDATA[Alfret, Alfret]]>;
<![CDATA[Felix Simeone, Nicholas Gerard]]>
<![CDATA[ Perspektif Hukum VOLUME 24 ISSUE 2 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law Hang Tuah University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30649/ph.v24i2.273
<![CDATA[This paper aims to criticize the criminal justice system that is currently unable to overcome the capacity conditions in correctional institutions. This condition is inseparable from the role and contribution of the criminal justice system itself. The justice system in Indonesia is still oriented towards retaliation against perpetrators so that the imposition of punishment by judges results in prison overcapacity. The results of the study found that Legal Concepts such as Deferred Prosecution Agreements as an alternative out-of-court dispute resolution as a form of contante justitie principle because it only involves prosecutors and defendants where judges act as supervisors. In addition, there is the concept of Plea Bargaining System which is a negotiation between the Public Prosecutor and the Defendant who admits his guilt to alleviate the charges and the judicial process can run more efficiently. Judicial Scrutiny plays a role in overseeing the legal process in coercive measures. These three systems should be implemented in the Indonesian legal system to improve and solve the overcrowding of correctional institutions.]]>
<![CDATA[The Conflict of Justice and Legal Certainty in the National Criminal Code: A Middle Way ]]>
<![CDATA[Sari, Agustina Indah Intan]]>;
<![CDATA[Frans, Mardian Putra]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol. 9 No. 3 (2024): OCTOBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.26623/jic.v9i3.9057
<![CDATA[The research discusses the unclear meaning of Article 53 paragraph (2) of Law No. 1 of 2023 which states that "If in upholding law and justice as referred to in paragraph (1) there is a conflict between legal certainty and justice, judges must prioritize justice." Justice is used for judges to adjudicate cases and certain conditions are used as a benchmark for judges in making decisions. However, there are several existing definitions of justice, there are still many views. The norm in the article has a vagueness of meaning, making it difficult for judges to equate commensurate thoughts. The implication of vagueness results in disparity in the use of justice to be used by judges, this potential disparity needs to be prevented by mediating the conflict between justice and certainty and providing guidance for judges in using justice in their decisions. This research uses a normative research approach. The results showed that judges have the authority to choose justice that contains legal certainty because a just decision is a manifestation of legal certainty, justice itself is born with the freedom of judges. The formulation of Article 53 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code needs to be interpreted correctly so that there is no disparity in decisions because justice is what the judge wants based on the law to create justice itself.]]>
<![CDATA[Analysis Environmental And State Losses In Corruption Offences ]]>
<![CDATA[Frans, Mardian Putra]]>;
<![CDATA[Sari, Agustina Indah Intan]]>;
<![CDATA[Eldillon, Iddo]]>
<![CDATA[ JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 11 No 1 (2025): April ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Dehasen ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v11i1.7855
<![CDATA[This research aims to discuss legal issues regarding the validity of environmental damage as an element of state loss in corruption crimes. The main objective of this research is to answer the legal issue of whether environmental damage can be categorized as an element of state loss in corruption crimes. The type of research used in this study is normative legal research, namely by examining legislation, legal doctrines, and legal principles related to the problems studied. The results show that environmental damage cannot be categorized as state losses as referred to in Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 of the Anti-Corruption Law because the aquo article must be proven by the existence of real state financial losses, not potential or estimated state financial losses. Now, law enforcement must be able to prove the value of real or actual losses to state finances or the state economy (actual loss), not only based on the value of losses that may occur (potential loss).]]>
<![CDATA[Rekonstruksi Hukum Acara Penyidikan di Bawah Kejaksaan berdasarkan Prinsip Dominus Litis ]]>
<![CDATA[Frans, Mardian Putra]]>;
<![CDATA[Ismara, Yudhistira Buana Cipta]]>
<![CDATA[ Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities Vol. 23 (2025): Proceedings of Seminar Nasional Kebaharuan KUHP Nasional dan Urgensi Pembaharuan KUH ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UM Purwokerto Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30595/pssh.v23i.1555
<![CDATA[Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan kondisi eksisting kewenangan penyidikan oleh jaksa penuntut umum, urgensi adanya pembaharuan hukum acara penyidikan, dan bentuk kewenangan penyidikan oleh jaksa penuntut umum sebagai pengendali perkara (dominus litis) di masa yang akan datang. Untuk itu, dalam tulisan ini mengambil rumusan masalah,1) bagaimana konstruksi penyidikan di bawah jaksa penuntut umum berdasarkan prinsip dominus litis saat ini di Indonesia? 2) Sejauh mana urgensi kewenangan pengendali penyidikan pada Jaksa berdasarkan prinsip dominus litis?. Penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan perbandingan. Adapun hasil penelitian menunjukan sebagai berikut:1) penyidikan di Indonesia tidak secara tegas menerapkan prinsip dominus litis 2) kondisi kewenangan penyidikan saat ini menimbulkan disharmoni antara penyidik dan jaksa penuntut umum.3) perlu dilakukan rekonstruksi substansial untuk menerapkan prinsip dominus litis. Bentuk kewenangan penyidikan oleh jaksa penuntut umum berdasarkan prinsip dominus litis di masa yang akan datang dengan menambahkan fungsi kewenangan penyidikan yang mana jaksa penuntut umum sebagai koordinator dan pengendali penyidikan yang penataannya dilakukan dalam KUHAP.]]>
<![CDATA[Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA): Model Keadilan Bagi Korporasi dan Negara dalam Tindak Pidana Pajak ]]>
<![CDATA[Daud, Kynan Raffael]]>;
<![CDATA[Frans, Mardian Putra]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 5 No 7 (2024): Tema Hukum Pidana ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[CV Rewang Rencang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[The existence of criminal sanctions against tax crime is not always effective in therecovery of state loss. Therefore. There is a need for an approach that is moreoriented towards the recovery of state losses in handling tax crime. Cases of taxviolation have been resolved through formal legal processes that have weaknessdue to lack of room for state recovery because of the long and expensive process.This research uses a normative legal research method. The results showed that theDeferred Prosecution Agreement as a legal concept that allows postponement of thecriminal process with certain conditions that must be met by the defendant includingefforts to recover state losses. The application of DPA should be considered in therevision of KUHAP so that state losses can be recovered by the postponement ofprosecution method.]]>
<![CDATA[Harmonizing Investigative Powers of KPK and Tax Authority in State Financial Crimes ]]>
<![CDATA[Vito Oktovianus Maupiku]]>;
<![CDATA[Mardian Putra Frans]]>
<![CDATA[ JUSTISI Vol. 11 No. 3 (2025): JUSTISI ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33506/js.v11i3.4369
<![CDATA[This study aims to analyze the overlap of investigative authority between investigators of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and investigators of the Directorate General of Taxes (DJP) in criminal acts that cause financial losses to the state and to harmonize these authorities.The study is a normative legal study using a legislative approach and a conceptual approach.Novelty previous studies have discussed the legal analysis of the authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission as the prosecutor of corruption offenders and the position of civil servant investigators of the Directorate General of Taxes in the framework of criminal tax law enforcement in Indonesia. The difference in this study is that it identifies and analyzes in depth the potential overlap of authority between the DJP investigators and the KPK in handling cases involving tax crimes that have implications for state financial losses, as well as formulating a model for coordination and synchronization of authority based on the principles of ultimum remedium and efficiency of law enforcement based on the principles of limited authority and lex specialis systematis.The results the application of the principle of limited authority and the principle of lex specialis systematis strengthens the authority of DJP investigators in handling tax crimes that cause financial losses to the state.Conclusion investigators of the DJP have more specific and effective authority in handling tax crimes that cause financial losses to the state, based on the principle of limited authority and the principle of lex specialis systematis.]]>
<![CDATA[Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Bank Sebagai Pengguna Artificial Intelligence ]]>
<![CDATA[Frans, Mardian Putra]]>;
<![CDATA[Sari, Agustina Indah Intan]]>;
<![CDATA[Panji, Krismelia Y]]>;
<![CDATA[Ismara, Yudhistira Buana Cipta]]>
<![CDATA[ JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): AUGUST ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i2.9026
<![CDATA[ The purpose of the research is to study and analyze the issue of the use of artificial intelligence (AI) by banks that results in losses to customers. To respond to the issue, this paper argues that banks as AI users should be held criminally liable despite the lack of mens rea in banks as corporations which are legal entities. For this reason, this paper uses the identification theory as an analytical tool for bank criminal liability. The issue is compiled on the results of normative legal research with a statute approach and conceptual approach. The results of the study show that based on the identification theory, the bank as an AI user can be held criminally liable with the public prosecutor must identify the person who committed the criminal act (actus reus) is the management as the controlling personnel (directing mind or controlling mind). The location of the AI mens rea is in the approval of the corporate controller to use AI, meaning that the approval is interpreted as the inner attitude of the controller to accept the risks arising from the use of AI. Tujuan dari penelitian untuk menganalisis isu penggunaan artificial intelligence (AI) oleh bank yang berakibat pada kerugian bagi nasabah. Untuk menanggapi isu tersebut, tulisan ini berpendapat bahwa bank sebagai pengguna AI patut dimintai pertanggungjawaban pidana meskipun tidak mempunyai mens rea pada bank sebagai korporasi yang merupakan badan hukum. Untuk itu, tulisan ini menggunakan teori identifikasi sebagai pisau analisis terhadap pertanggungjawaban pidana bank. Isu tersebut disusun atas hasil penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukan, berdasarkan teori identifikasi, bank sebagai pengguna AI dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban pidana dengan penuntut umum harus mengidentifikasi yang melakuan perbuatan pidana (actus reus) adalah pengurus sebagai personil pengendali (directing mind atau controlling mind). Letak mens rea AI ada pada persetujuan pengendali korporasi menggunakan AI, artinya sikao persetujuan tersebit dimaknai sebagai sikap batin pengali untuk menerima resiko yang timbul akibat penggunaai AI. ]]>
<![CDATA[URGENSI PERAMPASAN ASET SEBAGAI UPAYA PENGEMBALIAN KERUGIAN NEGARA HASIL TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI ]]>
<![CDATA[Syahputra, Rivaldi Hendy]]>;
<![CDATA[Frans, Mardian Putra]]>
<![CDATA[ JOURNAL EQUITABLE Vol 10 No 3 (2025) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM, Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.37859/jeq.v10i3.9489
<![CDATA[This research aims to examine the urgency of an Asset Forfeiture Law for proceeds of corruption in Indonesia. Existing laws, such as the Corruption Criminal Act Law and other criminal statutes, haven't been fully effective in asset forfeiture. This is because current mechanisms limit asset seizure and forfeiture to cases where a criminal conviction has already been issued. This limitation creates an opportunity for proceeds of corruption to be hidden or disposed of while legal processes await a criminal judgment. Therefore, a new Asset Forfeiture Law is needed, adopting asset forfeiture mechanisms known in civil law to enable the total recovery of state losses.]]>
<![CDATA[Perbandingan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Medis dalam Praktik Surrogate Mother di Indonesia, India dan Amerika ]]>
<![CDATA[Arthur Octivano Ruswandi]]>;
<![CDATA[Mardian Putra Frans]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Dinasti Review Publisher ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i1.3120
<![CDATA[Tulisan ini bertujuan membahas terkait adanya kekosongan hukum tentang Surrrogate Mother atau ibu pengganti. Istilah bagi wanita yang menyewakan rahimnya untuk ditanami benih yang asalnya dari pasangan yang ingin menggunakan jasa sewa rahim dan kemudian memberikan kembali anak tersebut kepada pasangan ini setelah anak tersebut dilahirkan. Hukum indonesia belum mengatur hal ini namun berpotensi dapat terjadinya di Indonesia, terhadap kondisi ini, menjadi persoalan sehingga perlu di lakukan perbandingan Ibu Pengganti (Surrogate Mother) dalam hukum di Indonesia tidak diperbolehkan, tetapi tidak ada pasal yang secara jelas menentang ataupun melarang penerapan praktik ini. Penelitian ini ingin membahas mengenai perbandingan Hukum penerapan praktik Surrogate Mother oleh negara yang telah melegalkan praktik ini seperti India dan Amerika, dan bagaimana kelebihan serta kekurangannya yang nantinya dapat dijadikan gambaran bagi Indonesia dalam perkembangannya memerlukan penerapan praktik ini.]]>
