Articles
<![CDATA[PENGGUNAAN TEKNIK DIVERSI DALAM PROSES PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK ]]>
<![CDATA[Warumboy, Charolin Khristy]]>;
<![CDATA[Mardian Putra Frans]]>
<![CDATA[ The Juris Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56301/juris.v8i1.1172
<![CDATA[This research aims to annotate the application of diversion in Decision Number 7/Pid/ Sus.Anak/2019/PN Jap. In this decision, the child was sentenced to imprisonment for 4 (four) months, while the Public Prosecutor (JPU) as law enforcer was obliged to carry out diversion. "How diversion efforts should have been carried out but the facts of the decision did not appear." So it is necessary to carry out legal research as to why the decision did not use diversion first. The enactment of Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (SPPA Law) marks a significant step towards providing special protection for children in conflict with the law. In this research, the focus lies on children in conflict with the law. The primary aim of this law is to enhance the regulation of the juvenile criminal justice system, ensuring better treatment and outcomes for children involved in legal conflicts. Legal protection for children is needed so that children receive attention from errors in the application of statutory regulations, which cause physical, mental and social harm. The aim of this research is to discover, describe (describe), and analyze the application of the diversion method in resolving criminal cases by children studying decision number 7/pid/sus.anak/2019/pn jap.]]>
<![CDATA[ANGKA KECELAKAAN KERJA NAIK PENINGKATAN DALAM 8 TAHUN TERAKHIR : PENGIMPLEMENTASIAN PROGRAM ZERO ACCIDENT AWARD ]]>
<![CDATA[Agris Bagus Puta Pratama]]>;
<![CDATA[Galang Satrio Nugroho]]>;
<![CDATA[Mardian Putra Frans]]>
<![CDATA[ The Juris Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56301/juris.v8i1.1198
<![CDATA[This research discusses important aspects in achieving complete mobility in a company, with a focus on labor aspects and Occupational Health and Safety (K3). Even though the company received the "Zero Accident Award" from the Ministry of Manpower for its success in achieving zero work accidents, the increase in the number of accidents in recent years shows the lack of success of this program. This research uses a qualitative approach with normative juridical analysis to identify gaps between regulations for implementing the Zero Accident Award program and field practice. The research results show the need for continuous improvement in risk management and work accident prevention in companies.]]>
<![CDATA[PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA BAGI PENGIDAP NECROPHILIA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PEMERKOSAAN MAYAT ]]>
<![CDATA[Siahaan, Vania Romasta]]>;
<![CDATA[Gita Rismawati]]>;
<![CDATA[Mardian Putra Frans]]>
<![CDATA[ The Juris Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56301/juris.v8i1.1225
<![CDATA[This research examines necrophilia as a sexual orientation deviation that has not been regulated in the National Criminal Code. The National Criminal Code Article 271 focuses on corpses, digging up or dismantling graves, taking, moving or transporting corpses and treating corpses in an uncivilized manner while the rape of corpses is not regulated in the National Criminal Code. Thus, there is a legal vacuum. This is a new problem because the status of necrophilia is mentioned as a form of disease so how is the form of responsibility. The purpose of this study is to find out how the regulation and form of criminal liability for perpetrators who have necrophilia in the crime of corpse rape. The research method used in this writing is juridical-normative legal research, using a statutory approach in order to discuss legal issues in this research. The results of this study found that criminal liability for people with necrophilia in the crime of corpse rape is basically not clearly regulated in the new Criminal Code. From the perspective of criminal acts, it is regulated in Article 271 of Law Number 1 Year 2023 (National Criminal Code) and from the perspective of the crime of rape, it is formulated in Article 415 of the National Criminal Code. While the crime against the corpse itself is regulated in Article 415 of the National Criminal Code and Article 271 of the new Criminal Code, Article 269 of the National Criminal Code and Article 270 of the National Criminal Code.]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS KEADILAN RESTORATIF KEJAKSAAN DITINJAU DARI ASAS KEPASTIAN HUKUM ]]>
<![CDATA[Ndruru, Grace]]>;
<![CDATA[Mardian Putra Frans]]>
<![CDATA[ The Juris Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56301/juris.v8i1.1230
<![CDATA[This research aims to analyze the process of peace efforts based on restorative justice in the prosecutor's office which only stops at issuing a decree to terminate the prosecution. implementation of restorative justice implemented by the prosecutor's office which has not been able to comply with the principle of legal certainty. So far, the process of seeking peace at the prosecutor's office only stops with a letter of decision to terminate the prosecution, in which the representation of the prosecutor's office as a peacemaker only targets peace between the suspect and the victim. in other words, there is no target for fulfilling the responsibilities that should be given to victims. Legal certainty is a guarantee of certainty that the law is running well without any arbitrary action, which means that rights and obligations are fulfilled. If legal certainty is achieved then each party gets the same rights. This research uses a normative juridical method with a statutory regulatory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this research explain that case resolution based on restorative justice in the prosecutor's office between perpetrators, victims and the prosecutor's office itself has not been able to fulfill the principle of legal certainty. This is because the prosecutor's efforts and pursuit are only to achieve peace, without considering the aspects of responsibility that must be fulfilled by the parties involved and bound. In the sense that Prosecutor's Regulation Number 15 of 2020 does not fulfill the principle of legal certainty.]]>
<![CDATA[Konsep Putusan Pemaaf Oleh Hakim (Rechterlijk Pardon) Sebagai Jenis Putusan Baru Dalam KUHAP ]]>
<![CDATA[Alfret]]>;
<![CDATA[Mardian Putra Frans]]>
<![CDATA[ KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Vol. 17 No. 3 (2023): KRTHA BHAYANGKARA: DECEMBER 2023 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v17i3.790
<![CDATA[Of the various articles that have undergone changes and additions in the new Criminal Code, one of them is interesting, namely Article 54 related to forgiveness by judges. However, whether the concept of forgiveness decision by the judge in the new Criminal Code has a position as a decision in the Criminal Procedure Code or the Criminal Procedure Bill. This research uses a normative juridical research method, which examines the problem by referring to positive law. The results of this study indicate the need for additional types of forgiveness decisions in the Criminal Procedure Bill as a form of criminal law reform because the provisions related to the types of decisions in the Criminal Procedure Code and the Criminal Procedure Bill are currently unable to accommodate forgiving decisions by judges. By examining in more depth the concept of forgiveness by the judge, it will appear that neither the Criminal Procedure Code nor the Criminal Procedure Bill contains the type of forgiveness decision.]]>
<![CDATA[Plea Bargaining System, Deffered Prosecution Agreement, dan Judicial Scrutiny sebagai Upaya Mengatasi Overkapasitas Lembaga Pemasyarakatan ]]>
<![CDATA[Frans, Mardian Putra]]>;
<![CDATA[Intan Sari, Agustina Indah]]>;
<![CDATA[Winda, Darisa]]>;
<![CDATA[Alfret, Alfret]]>;
<![CDATA[Felix Simeone, Nicholas Gerard]]>
<![CDATA[ Perspektif Hukum VOLUME 24 ISSUE 2 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law Hang Tuah University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30649/ph.v24i2.273
<![CDATA[This paper aims to criticize the criminal justice system that is currently unable to overcome the capacity conditions in correctional institutions. This condition is inseparable from the role and contribution of the criminal justice system itself. The justice system in Indonesia is still oriented towards retaliation against perpetrators so that the imposition of punishment by judges results in prison overcapacity. The results of the study found that Legal Concepts such as Deferred Prosecution Agreements as an alternative out-of-court dispute resolution as a form of contante justitie principle because it only involves prosecutors and defendants where judges act as supervisors. In addition, there is the concept of Plea Bargaining System which is a negotiation between the Public Prosecutor and the Defendant who admits his guilt to alleviate the charges and the judicial process can run more efficiently. Judicial Scrutiny plays a role in overseeing the legal process in coercive measures. These three systems should be implemented in the Indonesian legal system to improve and solve the overcrowding of correctional institutions.]]>
<![CDATA[Analysis Environmental And State Losses In Corruption Offences ]]>
<![CDATA[Frans, Mardian Putra]]>;
<![CDATA[Sari, Agustina Indah Intan]]>;
<![CDATA[Eldillon, Iddo]]>
<![CDATA[ JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 11 No 1 (2025): April ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Dehasen ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v11i1.7855
<![CDATA[This research aims to discuss legal issues regarding the validity of environmental damage as an element of state loss in corruption crimes. The main objective of this research is to answer the legal issue of whether environmental damage can be categorized as an element of state loss in corruption crimes. The type of research used in this study is normative legal research, namely by examining legislation, legal doctrines, and legal principles related to the problems studied. The results show that environmental damage cannot be categorized as state losses as referred to in Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 of the Anti-Corruption Law because the aquo article must be proven by the existence of real state financial losses, not potential or estimated state financial losses. Now, law enforcement must be able to prove the value of real or actual losses to state finances or the state economy (actual loss), not only based on the value of losses that may occur (potential loss).]]>
<![CDATA[Environmental Loss As An Element Of State Loss In Corruption Offences ]]>
<![CDATA[Karosekali, Timothy Christian Randal]]>;
<![CDATA[Frans, Mardian Putra]]>
<![CDATA[ JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 11 No 1 (2025): April ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Dehasen ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v11i1.7192
<![CDATA[This research aims to discuss legal issues regarding the validity of environmental loss as an element of state loss in criminal acts of corruption. The main aim of this research is to answer the legal issue of whether environmental damage can be categorized as an element of state loss in criminal acts of corruption. The type of research used in this research is normative legal research, namely by examining statutory regulations, legal doctrine, and legal principles related to the problem being studied. The research results show that environmental damage cannot be evidence of a criminal act because Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 of the Corruption Law must be proven by real state financial losses (actual loss) is not a potential or estimated state financial loss (potential loss). Now, law enforcers must be able to prove the real or real value of losses to state finances or the state economy (actual loss), not just based on the potential value of losses that may occur (potential loss)]]>
<![CDATA[IMPLEMENTASI PIDANA DIBAWAH MINIMAL DALAM KASUS NARKOTIKA BERDASAR PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PROGRESIVE ]]>
<![CDATA[Frans, Mardian Putra]]>
<![CDATA[ SUPREMASI : Jurnal Hukum Vol 4 No 2 (2022): SUPREMASI : Jurnal Hukum 2022 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Sahid ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.36441/supremasi.v4i2.652
<![CDATA[Pidana minimal telah ditentukan didalam Undang-Undang Nomor 35 tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika. Penentuan batas minimal menjadi pembatas bagi hakim untuk memberikan sanksi pidana tidak kurang dari batas minimal yang telah ditentukan. Hal ini tentu dipertentangkan dengan sifat imparsial dari hakim yang melaksanakan perannya dalam memeriksa dan mengadili suatu perkara pidana. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normative dengan mengkaji ratiolegis dari peraturan perundang-undangan untuk mengetahui kandungan filosofis dari suatu Undang-Undang. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, ditemukan bahwa hakim di Pengadilan Negeri kelas II B salatiga pada tahun 2019 dan 2020 telah menjatuhkan putusan dibawah minimal yang ditentukan didalam Undang-undang narkotika. Putusan ini menegaskan tentang peran hakim untuk memberikan keadilan bagi masyarakat serta mengambarkan sifat hakim yang imparsial dalam menjalankan tugasnya dan menciptakan progresivitas hukum.]]>
<![CDATA[Makna Yuridis Tindak Pidana Yang Sifatnya Ringan Dalam Konsep Judicial Pardon Ditinjau Berdasarkan Asas Legalitas ]]>
<![CDATA[Nazara, Imanuel]]>;
<![CDATA[Burhanudin, Krisna]]>;
<![CDATA[Putra Frans, Mardian]]>
<![CDATA[ Widya Yuridika Vol 8 No 1 (2025): Law and Society ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Widya Gama Malang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31328/wy.v8i1.5573
<![CDATA[The legal issue of this research is the blurring of the juridical meaning of light criminal acts in the provision of forgiveness by a judge or what is also called Judicial Pardon which is contained in Article 54 Paragraph (2) of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code. This research analyzes in particular the explanation of Article 54 Paragraph (2) relating to the phrase contained in that Article, namely minor criminal acts. Indicators of an act as a light criminal act are not explained explicitly, such as benchmarks for the lightness of the act, the threat of punishment, and the threat of a fine in the Criminal Code, thereby giving rise to ambiguity or unclear meaning which can cause inequality in the application of punishment in criminal law. in Indonesia. This research is normative legal research which examines it based on positive law. The results of this research are that regarding the meaning of minor criminal acts in the judge's giving of forgiveness is not in accordance with the principle of legality, namely that there is unclear meaning. The aim of this research is to explore the meaning of minor criminal acts in giving forgiveness by judges based on the principle of legality.]]>
