Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.993
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Legalitas LEX ET SOCIETATIS Qistie: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurisprudentie Jurnal Akta Al-'Adl Jurnal Meta-Yuridis JURNAL ILMIAH LIVING LAW Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi Jurnal Jatiswara Jurnal Legal Reasoning Selisik : Jurnal Hukum dan Bisnis Media Iuris Pro Patria: Jurnal Pendidikan, Kewarganegaraan, Hukum, Sosial, dan Politik Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Paulus Law Journal Widya Pranata Hukum : Jurnal Kajian dan Penelitian Hukum HUKMY : Jurnal Hukum Lex Journal : Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Jurnal Hukum Caraka Justitia Juris Humanity: Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia Adil Indonesia Journal
Roni Sulistyanto Luhukay, Roni Sulistyanto
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Widya Mataram
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 35 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurisprudentie

 1 
INDEPENDENSI KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN PASCA AMANDEMEN UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR TAHUN 1945 DAN RELEVANSINYA BAGI PENEGAKAN HUKUM YANG BERKEADILAN DI INDONESIA Roni Sulistyanto Luhukay
Jurisprudentie: Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Vol 6 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum uin alauddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/jurisprudentie.v6i1.7973

Abstract

Filosofi independensi kekuasaan kehakiman adalah kekuasaan negara yang bebas dari segala bentuk intervensi baik dari dalam maupun dari luar kekuasaan kehakiman, kecuali atas dasar kekuatan idiologi pancasila dan konstitusi Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Nilai-nilai falsafah pancasila sebagai pandangan hidup bangsa, yang diletakkan dalam konstitusi Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 dan peraturan perundangan-undangan sebagai koridor hukum operasional, merupakan prasyarat tegaknya hukum dan keadilan yang dicita-citakan. Kedua, secara historis dan emperik, bentuk-bentuk intervensi terhadap jalannya kekuasaan kehakiman di Indonesia, baik sebelum maupun setelah berlakunya sistem peradilan satu atap di bawah Mahkamah Agung RI. Masih tetap ada dengan segala dinamika dan perubahannya.
Reflecting the Special Autonomy of Papua Province in the Perspective of Law and Human Rights Roni Sulistyanto luhukay; Tatiek Sri Djatmiati; Emanuel Sujatmoko
Jurisprudentie: Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Vol 9 No 2 (2022): Volume 9 Nomor 2 Desember 2022
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum uin alauddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/jurisprudentie.v9i2.31843

Abstract

The practice of administering the particular autonomy government of the Papua Province seems to be centralized even though the state's policy has given the Special Autonomy status to the Papua Province. It can be proven that the authority regulated in the Special Autonomy Law cannot be adequately implemented because central government intervention is very dominant in carrying out certain authorities. Even though the changes in the legislation from Law No. 21 of 2001 to Law No. 2 of 2021 regarding special autonomy for Papua Province also cannot provide many changes regarding the achievement of special autonomy. The birth of Law No. 2 of 2021 concerning the second amendment to Law No. 21 of 2001 concerning special autonomy for the province of Papua. Provide at least 20 amendments to articles regarding the authority of local government, MRP, DPRK, increase in Papua special autonomy funds, expansion of Papua provinces and districts, and establishment of implementing regional regulations of the Special Autonomy Law. The formation of this regulatory change has not provided a concept for protecting indigenous Papuans, considering the potential for centralization of authority to occur still. In addition, this regulatory change also does not provide an overview of the cultural aspects of the indigenous Papuans themselves, and this can be seen by not involving the MRP, which is a representation of the Papuan people. For example, in article 76, paragraphs 1 and 2 regarding the division of the province and district without involving the MRP as a representative of the indigenous Papuans.
Co-Authors Abdul Kadir Abdul Kadir Jaelani Bambang Tri Bawono Chrisjanto, Edy Edy Chrisjanto Emanuel Sujatmoko Fifink Praiseda Alviolita Fithrian Luthfan, Gusti Fadhil Hartanto Hartanto Hartanto Jum’ati Jum’ati Marsal, Antonino Pedro Murdoko, Murdoko Praiseda Alviota, Fifink Rachmasari Kusuma Dewi Saiful Abdullah Sationo, Teguh Imam Syafiqurrohman Syafiqurrohman Tatiek Sri Djatmiati