Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

Dedi Mulyadi's Populism in Building Political Communication Through Social Media Content Aldiansyah, Alfin; Ramli, Muhammad Ruslan
Jurnal Impresi Indonesia Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Impresi Indonesia
Publisher : Riviera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58344/jii.v5i3.7616

Abstract

This research discusses the populism displayed by KDM or Dedi Mulyadi through social media TikTok, as well as how the public responds to it. KDM actively uses social media as a way to build personal branding. The problem is how the form of populism displayed by Dedi Mulyadi in Tiktok content, and how the public responds to it. The goal is to explain the form of populism used on TikTok's social media, and the public's response to it. This study uses the Populism Theory from Cas Mudde and Rovira Kaltwasser and the Reception Theory from Stuart Hall, with the method of Critical Discourse Analysis or AWK. The paradigm uses constructivism with critical discourse analysis techniques. The analysis focuses on four category clusters, namely Politics, Social, and Family. Analysis was carried out on Dedi Mulyadi's content in one period, and interviews were conducted with people from various backgrounds. The results found that Dedi Mulyadi adheres to moralistic, cultural, and personal populism, namely populism. who consciously build personal and moral closeness. Then it was also found that three of the six speakers with a percentage of fifty percent chose to be in the Negotiated position or agreed with several notes on the way carried out by Dedi Mulyadi.
Framing Analysis of the South China Sea News Conflict in the Malay Media Das'ad Latif; Muhammad Ruslan Ramli; Ballian Siregar
Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): December 2025 - Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia
Publisher : Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25008/jkiski.v10i2.1218

Abstract

This study examines the South China Sea conflict involving countries in the region. However, it is not limited to those bordering the South China Sea because other superpower countries are also involved, such as the US, Britain, Germany, Canada, Australia, India. The conflict garnered serious attention from Malay media such as kompas.com (Indonesia), bharian.com.my (Malaysia) and mediamediapermata.com (Brunei). This study sought to inspect how Malay media frame the South China Sea conflict using a qualitative-descriptive approach. Using Entman’s model, it focused on root causes, problem causes, moral judgments, and recommendations. As a result, the three media saw China's claims to the South Sea and its abundant natural resources as the root of the problem. Bharian.com.my added that another root of the problem is China's hegemony in the South Seas. For causes of the problem, they agreed on China’s over-aggression and their patrol warships in the South China Sea. In addition, kompas.com and bharian.com added China's policy requiring foreign ships to report if they pass into the South China Sea. Furthermore, kompas.com also saw the different interests of ASEAN countries and the formation of the AUKUS alliance as the cause of the problem. In terms of moral judgments, they agreed on the need to maintain peace, order and security in the South China Sea. As for the recommendation aspect, they encourage compliance with UN conventions. Then, kompas.com and bharian.com.my also considered the importance of diplomacy at the negotiating table.