Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.42
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi JUSTISI Mulawarman Law Review Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum REUSAM ; Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Journal of Gender and Social Inclusion in Muslim Societies JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum Madani: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia Strategi Memperkuat Integritas Lembaga Peradilan Indonesia Judex Laguens Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security
Andi Hakim Lubis
Universitas Medan Area
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Legal Integration of Customary Law within Indonesia’s National Land Law System Lubis, Ikhsan; Lubis, Duma Indah Sari Lubis; Lubis, Andi Hakim Lubis
Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 10 No 2 (2025): Mulawarman Law Review - December 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/

Abstract

This article examines the legal integration of customary law into Indonesia’s national land law system, with specific reference to the constitutional framework and the Basic Agrarian Law. The purpose of this study is to analyze the status of customary law, identify its impacts on land tenure and use, and formulate legal strategies to harmonize customary and national law toward equitable and sustainable land governance. Employing a normative juridical method, the research draws on primary legal materials, including statutory regulations, constitutional provisions, and jurisprudence, supported by secondary academic sources. The findings indicate that although customary law is constitutionally recognized, its implementation remains inconsistent due to legal fragmentation, administrative constraints, and sectoral regulatory conflicts. To address this, the study proposes a pluralistic legal model based on codification, procedural innovation, institutional reform, and participatory law-making to ensure the effective and just integration of customary land systems within the national legal order.
Penerapan Uang Paksa (Dwangsom): Strategi Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Andi Hakim Lubis; Rismanto J. Purba; Muazzul
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 05 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i05.1808

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penerapan uang paksa (dwangsom) sebagai strategi alternatif dalam upaya pengembalian kerugian keuangan negara akibat tindak pidana korupsi. Praktik korupsi di Indonesia telah menyebabkan kerugian negara dalam jumlah besar, sementara mekanisme pemulihan yang tersedia seperti pidana penjara dan pembayaran uang penggantibelum sepenuhnya efektif dalam menjamin pengembalian aset negara secara maksimal. Dwangsom, sebagai sanksi yang bersifat accessoir dan subsidair, dapat digunakan sebagai alat tekanan hukum terhadap terpidana yang tidak mematuhi putusan pengadilan, khususnya dalam perkara perdata yang berkaitan dengan pengembalian aset. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif melalui pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan putusan pengadilan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa dwangsom dapat berfungsi sebagai tekanan psikologis yang mendorong pelaksanaan putusan secara sukarela melalui ancaman kewajiban membayar sejumlah uang setiap hari keterlambatan. Dengan sifatnya yang fleksibel dan efisien, dwangsom berpotensi menjadi solusi dalam mempercepat pemulihan aset tanpa melalui proses eksekusi yang panjang.
A Multidimensional Legal Approach to Combat Land Mafia: Regulation, Digital Systems, and Agrarian Legal Education Lubis, Ikhsan; Duma Indah Sari Lubis; Andi Hakim Lubis
JUSTISI Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v12i1.4445

Abstract

This study aims to examine strategies for eradicating land mafia practices through a normative legal approach supported by a digital land administration system and agrarian law education. The method used is a normative legal approach, based on an analysis of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials in Indonesia's national land law system. The novelty of this research lies in its multidimensional legal approach, which combines positive legal regulations, digital land governance, and legal education as interconnected pillars. These three elements are analyzed not as separate initiatives, but as complementary efforts in which legal frameworks such as the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) serve as the foundation, the digital land system increases transparency and reduces manipulation, and legal education strengthens public legal awareness to prevent land-related crimes. The results of the study show that although each component has its advantages, challenges remain, especially in the implementation of inconsistent legal regulations such as the UUPA. However, if coordinated effectively, these elements can reinforce each other in the national legal system. In conclusion the integrated application of these components can promote a fair, transparent, and socially just land governance structure.
Dynamics of Anti-Terrorism Regulation: A Comparative Study Between Indonesia, Malaysia and the United States: Dinamika Regulasi Anti-Terorisme: Studi Perbandingan Antara Indonesia, Malaysia, dan Amerika Serikat Anang Hendri Prayogo; Saragih, Geofani Milthree; Erdianto Effendi; Andi Hakim Lubis; Yuliana Yuliana
Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): July-December, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijctns.v4i2.25125

Abstract

This paper examines the dynamics of anti-terrorism regulations in Indonesia, Malaysia and the United States by comparing the legal frameworks and law enforcement mechanisms in each country. legal frameworks and law enforcement mechanisms that apply in each country. The purpose of this research is to analyse how each country shapes its anti-terrorism law as a response to national threats, while at the same time maintaining a balance of as a response to national threats, while at the same time maintaining the balance between state security and human rights protection. The main issues discussed include differences in legal approach, scope of state authority in counter-terrorism operations, as well as monitoring mechanism to prevent authority in counter-terrorism operations, as well as monitoring mechanism to prevent abuse of authority. abuse of authority. The method used is juridical method used is normative-comparative juridical by analysing statutory instruments, government policies, and institutional practices in the three countries. The results The results show that Indonesia emphasises procedural guarantees in its anti-terrorism law, Malaysia maintains a preventive detention model rooted in historical security doctrine. rooted in historical security doctrine, while the United States applies a layered a layered approach backed by extensive intelligence powers and judicial oversight. judicial oversight. In conclusion, although all three countries prioritise national security, their approaches reflect different security, their approaches reflect different legal traditions and political contexts. political context. Therefore, a balanced regulatory model should take into account effectiveness, constitutional accountability and protection of fundamental rights.
Co-Authors Abdul Hakim Siagian Anang Hendri Prayogo Anastasia Maria Teresa Andy Putra Namo Angelina Dewi Desi Monica Purba Duma Indah Sari Lubis Erdianto Effendi Fahrizal S.Siagian Gatot Teguh Arifyanto Ghaniu Rezya Pratama Isabela Saudur Br Siregar Jonathan Dionsera Napitupulu Lubis, Duma Indah Sari Lubis Lubis, Ikhsan Maria Theresia Tarigan Muazzul Muazzul M Muazzul, Muazzul Muhammad Din Al Fajar Nabila Afifah Salwa NIM. A1011141008, YULIANA Purba, Rismanto J. Rismanto J. Purba Saied Firouzfar Saragih, Geofani Milthree Sigar P. Berutu