Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.832
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ensiklopedia of Journal JHR (Jurnal Hukum Replik) International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Jurnal Hukum Sehasen el-Amwal Indonesia of Journal Business Law JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Journal of Innovative and Creativity Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy International Journal Of Synergi In Law, Criminal And Justice
Aulia Rahman Hakim Hasibuan
Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 19 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 19 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Analisis Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga yang Mengakibatkan Kematian (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Kabanjahe No. 281/Pid.B/2017/PN-Kbj) Radana, Ilham Kembar; Hasibuan, Aulia Rahman Hakim; Rahmayanti, Rahmayanti
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v5i4.19641

Abstract

Kekerasan dalam rumah tangga (KDRT) yang berujung kematian merupakan permasalahan serius sebagaimana tergambar dalam Putusan PN Kabanjahe No. 281/Pid.B/2017/PN-Kbj, di mana penelitian hukum normatif ini menganalisis pengaturan hukumnya dalam KUHP dan UU No. 23 Tahun 2004, faktor-faktor penyebabnya yang berakar pada sistem patriarki dan relasi kuasa tidak setara, serta mengidentifikasi kekeliruan fundamental dalam putusan tersebut karena majelis hakim menerapkan Pasal 44 ayat (3) UU PKDRT dengan pidana 14 tahun penjara meskipun fakta persidangan menunjukkan terpenuhinya unsur pembunuhan berencana (Pasal 340 KUHP) yang seharusnya diancam dengan pidana lebih berat.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA ANAK YANG BERKONFLIK DENGAN HUKUM DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA Sembiring, Junior Kadiva; Ramadani, Suci; Hasibuan, Aulia Rahman Hakim
Ensiklopedia of Journal Vol 7, No 4 (2025): Vol. 7 No. 4 Edisi 3 Juli 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/eoj.v7i4.3363

Abstract

Abstract: This study examines the criminal liability of children in conflict with the law in the context of drug abuse crimes. The main focus of this study is to identify the legal aspects that regulate the liability of children, as well as the challenges faced in enforcing the law against child offenders. The methods used consist of normative legal analysis and interviews with legal practitioners, psychologists, and social workers. specific provisions in the Child Criminal Justice System Law, implementation in the field is often hampered by social stigma, lack of rehabilitation facilities, and public misunderstanding of children's rights. This study recommends the need for policy reform and increased public awareness of child protection, as well as a rehabilitative approach.Keyword: Criminal Liability, Children, Drug Abuse.
Peran Penuntut Umum dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Ringan melalui Restorative Justice Hasibuan, Aulia Rahman Hakim; Brahmana, Egi Bastanta; Herqutanto, Agung
Indonesia of Journal Business Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): IJBL - Artikel Riset Juli 2025
Publisher : Information Technology and Science (ITScience)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47709/ijbl.v4i2.6665

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji peran strategis Penuntut Umum dalam penerapan restorative justice pada perkara pidana ringan pasca terbitnya Peraturan Kejaksaan RI Nomor 15 Tahun 2020. Menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan studi pustaka dan observasi, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa Penuntut Umum berperan tidak hanya sebagai pelaksana penuntutan, tetapi juga sebagai fasilitator, mediator, dan pengawas kesepakatan damai. Meskipun telah diatur normatif, implementasi di lapangan masih terkendala paradigma retributif, perbedaan pemahaman antar aparat, serta lemahnya mekanisme monitoring. Rekomendasi meliputi standardisasi interpretasi, pelatihan berkelanjutan, dan penguatan sistem pengawasan serta dokumentasi, guna mewujudkan keadilan yang lebih substantif, efisien, dan humanis.
CRIMINAL ACTS OF WIVE'S ABANDONMENT BASED ON LAW NUMBER 23 OF 2004 CONCERNING ELIMINATION OF VIOLENCE IN HOUSEHOLD (Analysis of Judgment 85/pid.sus/2019/PN.sbh) Aulia Rahman Hakim Hasibuan
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): May
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v3i3.817

Abstract

One form of crime that occurs in the household environment is domestic violence (KDRT). The thing that is dreamed of by a couple in a marriage is to form a family that is able to provide eternal happiness and create harmony and peace besides having children in accordance with Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. Regarding the elimination of domestic violence, it is regulated in Law Number 23 of 2004. Today household neglect of wives is still common, although various efforts have been made to reduce or even overcome it. Based on this, the problem arises what factors cause neglect in the household and how to punish perpetrators of domestic violence. Then research is needed, namely the type of empirical legal research. In this case law is conceptualized as an empirical phenomenon that can be observed and researched in the field. Factors that cause neglect in the household are economic problems, infidelity and behavioral factors. The problem of sentencing from the analysis of cases of neglect in the household raised the conviction of the defendant with a very light 6 month prison sentence that should have been.
Tindak Pidana Penipuan Online Dan Pertanggungjawaban Hukumnya Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Ite Di Indonesia Aulia Rahman Hakim Hasibuan; Andika Kelvin Pranata Pakpahan; Efrrai Daeli
Journal of Innovative and Creativity Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tindak pidana penipuan online merupakan salah satu bentuk kejahatan siber yang semakin marak seiring dengan pesatnya perkembangan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi di Indonesia. Penipuan online umumnya dilakukan melalui media elektronik dan transaksi digital dengan berbagai modus yang menyesatkan sehingga menimbulkan kerugian bagi masyarakat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis tindak pidana penipuan online serta pertanggungjawaban hukum pelakunya berdasarkan Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (ITE) di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang undangan dan pendekatan konseptual, yang mengkaji ketentuan hukum positif serta doktrin hukum terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun Undang-Undang ITE tidak secara eksplisit menyebut istilah penipuan online, namun ketentuan Pasal 28 ayat (1) juncto Pasal 45A Undang-Undang ITE dapat dijadikan dasar pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pelaku penipuan online yang menyebarkan informasi bohong dan menyesatkan sehingga menimbulkan kerugian dalam transaksi elektronik. Selain itu, pertanggungjawaban pidana juga dapat didasarkan pada ketentuan dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana sebagai hukum pidana umum. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pemahaman yang komprehensif terhadap unsur-unsur tindak pidana serta penguatan penegakan hukum guna memberikan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan bagi masyarakat.
RESTORATIVE JUSTICE FOR CHILDREN IN CONFLICT BY LAW REVIEWED LAW NUMBER 11YEAR2012ABOUT THE JUVENILE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Aruf Bahirra; Ismaidar; Aulia Rahman Hakim Hasibuan
Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): June
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21723496

Abstract

This study examines the application of restorative justice to children in conflict with the law from the perspective of Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (SPPA Law). The purpose of the study was to analyze the application of restorative justice principles, identify obstacles to their implementation, and assess the extent to which the juvenile justice system in Indonesia has prioritized the best interests of children. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory approach and conceptual approach, supported by secondary data in the form of laws and regulations, legal literature, and previous research results. The results of the study show that normatively, the SPPA Law has provided a strong legal basis for the application of restorative justice through the Diversion mechanism as stipulated in Articles 6-15. The main principle of the juvenile justice system emphasizes protection, justice, the best interests of children, and makes detention and punishment as the last resort (ultima ratio) as stated in Article 2 letters i and j. However, empirically, the implementation of this principle is not optimal. Diversion often fails to be carried out due to the lack of understanding of the authorities of Article 9 and Article 10 which regulate the consent of victims and the limits of minor crimes. In addition, the implementation of child protection as stipulated in Articles 30-38 has not been maximized, because children are still often detained even though they do not meet the conditions of detention.
Law Enforcement Against the Criminal Act of Theft With Violence Based on Law Number 1 Of 2023 Concerning The Criminal Code Jessica Oktari Marbun; Mhd. Azhali Siregar; Aulia Rahman Hakim Hasibuan
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 12 (2026): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i12.2538

Abstract

Violent theft remains one of the most serious conventional crimes in Indonesia because it not only causes material losses but also threatens public safety and social order. Although Indonesia has enacted Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (National Criminal Code) as part of a comprehensive criminal law reform, studies examining the implications of Article 479 concerning violent theft remain limited. Existing research generally focuses on the application of Article 365 of the former Criminal Code without critically analyzing the legal transformation introduced by the National Criminal Code and its implications for law enforcement effectiveness.This study aims to analyze the legal regulation of violent theft under the previous Criminal Code and the National Criminal Code, compare Article 365 of the former Criminal Code with Article 479 of Law Number 1 of 2023, and evaluate the effectiveness of law enforcement in achieving legal certainty. This research employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The legal materials consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials collected through library research, supported by Decision Number 2615/Pid.B/2018/PN Mdn.The findings indicate that Article 479 of the National Criminal Code maintains the essential elements of violent theft while introducing a more systematic formulation that reflects contemporary criminal law principles emphasizing legal certainty, proportionality, and social protection. However, the effectiveness of law enforcement remains dependent on the quality of legal institutions, the professionalism of law enforcement officers, supporting facilities, and public legal awareness. This study contributes to the development of Indonesian criminal law by providing a comprehensive legal analysis of the transition from the former Criminal Code to the National Criminal Code concerning violent theft and its implications for future law enforcement practices.
Efektivitas Penerapan Restorative Justice dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Penadahan Berupa Handphone di Cabang Kejaksaan Negeri Mandailing Natal di Natal Ari Antonius Sibarani; Aulia Rahman Hakim Hasibuan; Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 10 (2026): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i10.2372

Abstract

Tindak pidana penadahan Handphone merupakan tindakan yang dilarang oleh hukum yang diatur dalam Pasal 480 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (selanjutnya disingkat KUHP), Pasal 481 dan 482 KUHP. Penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana seperti pidana pada pasal 480 KUHP dapat dilakukan dengan mengutamakan rasa keadilan bagi korban maupun pelaku dengan berdasarkan rasa kemanusian. Efektivitas penerapan Restorative Justice dalam penyelesaian tindak pidana penadahan di Cabang Kejaksaan Negeri Mandailing Natal berdasarkan Peraturan Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dasar hukum, penerapan, serta faktor-faktor yang menjadi penghambat pelaksanaan Restorative Justice dalam perkara penadahan Handphone dengan kerugian dibawah dua juta lima ratus ribu rupiah. Metode yang digunakan ialah penelitian yuridis empiris dengan pendekatan deskriptif analitis, yang menggambarkan penerapan keadilan restoratif berdasarkan data lapangan dan wawancara dengan jaksa penuntut umum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan keadilan restoratif di Cabang Kejaksaan Negeri Mandailing Natal belum sepenuhnya berjalan efektif karena adanya kendala pada aspek substansi hukum, keterbatasan sumber daya manusia, faktor geografis, serta rendahnya kesadaran hukum masyarakat. Meski demikian, pendekatan ini terbukti mampu mewujudkan penyelesaian perkara yang lebih cepat, efisien, dan berorientasi pada pemulihan hubungan antara pelaku, korban, serta masyarakat. Keberhasilan pelaksanaannya sangat bergantung pada peran aktif jaksa sebagai fasilitator perdamaian, dukungan masyarakat, serta konsistensi penerapan regulasi. Dengan optimalisasi ketiga aspek tersebut, penerapan Restorative Justice diharapkan mampu memperkuat nilai kemanusiaan dan mewujudkan keadilan substantif dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia
Analysis Of Abuse Of Authority By Civil Servants In Corruption Crimes (Decision Study No. 141/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2024/Pn Mdn) Diva Sadarta Tarigan; Aulia Rahman Hakim Hasibuan; Syahranuddin Syahranuddin
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 12 No 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v12i1.11361

Abstract

This study aims to examine the legal framework governing the abuse of authority by civil servants acting jointly in receiving gifts within corruption offenses, as well as to conduct a juridical analysis of the elements of “Abuse of Authority” and “Joint Acceptance of Gifts” as corruption crimes in Decision Number 141/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/PN Mdn. This research employs a normative legal method with a descriptive approach, carried out through library research by examining primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, including the Anti-Corruption Law and the Criminal Code. The results of the study indicate that, normatively, the regulation concerning abuse of authority and the acceptance of gifts by civil servants has been clearly stipulated under Article 11 and Article 12B of Law Number 31 of 1999 as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001, which classifies such acts as formal offenses. In the context of participation, criminal liability for perpetrators acting jointly refers to the doctrine of participation (medepleger) under the Criminal Code, which requires a unity of intent and conscious cooperation. In Decision Number 141/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/PN Mdn, the panel of judges held that all elements were fulfilled based on the defendant’s status as a civil servant, the receipt of money related to official authority, and the repetitive nature of the acts. However, substantively, there is a lack of in-depth elaboration regarding the causal relationship between the concrete authority of the office and the receipt of gifts. In addition, there is an imbalance between the term of imprisonment and the amount of restitution imposed, raising issues of proportionality in sentencing. Therefore, consistency in juridical reasoning and the application of the principle of proportionality are necessary to strengthen the effectiveness of law enforcement in corruption cases.
Co-Authors ABDUL RAHMAN MAULANA SIREGAR Abdulrahman Nur Wahidin Adillah Fajar Siddiq Aliza Ayu Novila Andika Kelvin Pranata Pakpahan Ari Antonius Sibarani Aruf Bahirra Bambang Fitrianto Brahmana, Egi Bastanta Daulay, Puspa Ainni Diva Sadarta Tarigan Efrrai Daeli Happy Krisman Laia Harun Firman Kurniansyah Hernawaty Hernawaty Herqutanto, Agung Indra Utama Tanjung Ismaidar I, Ismaidar Jessica Oktari Marbun Kharisma Preety Queen Cindai Br Panjaitan Lidya Ramadhani Hasibuan Mhd. Azhali Siregar Muhammad Ikhsan Surbakti Pasaribu, Robby Naldo Shunan Radana, Ilham Kembar Rahmayanti Rahmayanti Ramadani, Suci Riyanti Fatwani Sembiring, Junior Kadiva Sempati Uli Artha Tambunan Sidi, Redyanto Syahranuddin Tika Hairani Tri Sandi