Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 27 Documents
Search

Positioning Of Legal Philosophy To Maintain The Dignity Of Law Enforcement Boy Nurdin; Juristo Juristo; Wahyu Widodo; Apriaji Setyawan; Ubaidilah Ishaq; Satria Dwi Rahardja; Anwar Sunarjo
Edunity Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Vol. 3 No. 8 (2024): Edunity : Social and Educational Studies
Publisher : PT Publikasiku Academic Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57096/edunity.v3i8.302

Abstract

The enforcement of law is an integral aspect of the legal system's functioning, and it is often criticized with phrases like "no viral, no justice" or "law is sharp downwards, blunt upwards." In this context, how does the philosophy of law play a role in upholding the integrity of law enforcement, and how can a legal enforcement system be grounded in the rationality of legal philosophy. This type of research is normative with a conceptual approach based on secondary data. Secondary data is obtained through literature review and then analyzed qualitatively. Based on the analysis, it is found that the role of legal philosophy in maintaining the integrity of law enforcement involves guiding law enforcers to work effectively, respect, follow, and consistently apply rules to create balanced relationships by providing rights to everyone through fair and proportional procedures. A legal enforcement system based on the rationality of legal philosophy would involve:  Methodical Enforcement: Law enforcement. is conducted in a structured and systematic manner. Systematic Enforcement: Law enforcement follows a structured process. Coherent Enforcement: Law enforcement is logically consistent. Rational Enforcement: Law enforcement is based on reason rather than emotion. Comprehensive Enforcement: Law enforcement addresses all relevant aspects comprehensively. Radical Enforcement: Law enforcement applies thoroughly and decisively. Universal Enforcement: Law enforcement is applied universally, ensuring that it is fair and equal for all. This research confirms that a strong and integrated legal philosophy position in the law enforcement system is the key to maintaining and enhancing the dignity of the law itself. This requires commitment from all legal stakeholders to continue to apply and develop the principles of legal philosophy in every aspect of law enforcement.
Legal Void of Social and Environmental Responsibility in the Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Energy and Natural Resources Sector Suhadi Sukendar Situmorang; Boy Nurdin
Journal of Social Research Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v4i1.2331

Abstract

This research aims to explore the legal vacuum related to Social and Environmental Responsibility (CSR) in the implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the energy and natural resources sector. Although CSR has been recognized as an important aspect of sustainability and corporate responsibility, the regulation regarding the minimum amount of funds that must be allocated for CSR is still not clearly and concretely regulated in the applicable legislation in Indonesia. The results show that legal uncertainty regarding the amount of TJSL funds has a significant impact on the implementation of CSR programs by companies. Many companies experience difficulties in planning and allocating budgets for effective CSR programs, due to the absence of clear guidelines regarding the funding obligations that must be met. The study also identified various challenges faced by companies in implementing CSR, including differences in understanding of CSR among stakeholders, environmental challenges arising from operational activities, and community pressure to increase social and environmental contributions.
Legal Dilemma of Abortion Regulation for Rape Victims in Indonesia from the Perspective of Justice Niken Budi Setyawati; Boy Nurdin
Journal of Social Research Vol. 3 No. 12 (2024): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v3i12.2339

Abstract

The legal dilemma surrounding abortion regulation for rape victims in Indonesia is a complex issue that involves moral, social, and legal aspects. In Indonesian law, Articles 299 and 346 of the Penal Code regulate abortion, while Law No. 36 of 2009 concerning Health provides provisions regarding emergency situations where abortion may be justified. This study aims to analyze these regulations from the perspective of justice, considering the rights of rape victims and the social impacts of abortion prohibitions. The research method utilized in this study is normative juridical methodology, also known as library research. Normative juridical research focuses on secondary data sources as the main reference. This secondary data consists of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The results indicate that although there are legal foundations, the implementation of abortion regulations for rape victims still faces challenges in achieving justice and protecting women's rights.
Reform of Mortgage Execution Through Auction in the Context of Seized Collateral (AYDA) by Banks Hanif Fonda; Boy Nurdin
Journal of Social Research Vol. 3 No. 12 (2024): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v3i12.2342

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the management of Seized Collateral (AYDA) and auction procedures applied by banks in dealing with non-performing loans. Through a normative juridical approach, this study explores the impact of AYDA on market value and bank liquidity, as well as the challenges faced in the auction execution, including low buyer participation and bureaucratic constraints. The results show that effective management of AYDA can reduce the level of Non-Performing Loan (NPL), while optimal auction procedures can maximize collateral value and minimize the risk of losses. Policy recommendations are proposed to enhance the effectiveness of AYDA management and formulate more efficient auction procedures, with the hope of contributing positively to bank financial stability and the economy.
Legal Protection of Eigentumsverponding Deeds in the Context of Inheritance Rights Titin Hartati; Boy Nurdin
Journal of Social Research Vol. 3 No. 12 (2024): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v3i12.2349

Abstract

The strength of the eigendom verponding deed in the context of inheritance rights, as well as the legal protection provided to the rights holders. The eigendom verponding deed serves as valid proof of land ownership and has significant legal implications, especially in the inheritance process. This research explores the legal protection available for holders of eigendom verponding deeds and the legal consequences arising from such deeds in the context of inheritance rights. It has been found that this deed can function as strong evidence in the inheritance process; however, it is also vulnerable to disputes if not supported by adequate documentation. This study also discusses efforts that eigendom verponding rights holders can undertake to safeguard and protect their inheritance rights. These efforts include land rights registration, conversion of rights into ownership rights, and compliance with applicable legal provisions to ensure that inheritance rights are recognized and not lost. This research emphasizes the importance of a deep understanding of the rights and obligations of eigendom verponding deed holders, as well as the need for consultation with legal advisors to minimize the risk of losing rights.
Comparative Study on the Application of the Ultimum Remedium Principle in Excise Law: A Comparative Analysis Between Indonesia and ASEAN Countries Handoko Nindyo Wardono; Boy Nurdin
International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): International Journal of Social Service and Research
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/ijssr.v6i5.1398

Abstract

This research evaluates the effectiveness of criminal law enforcement against illegal cigarette excise violations in Indonesia using a socio-legal approach and regional comparisons within the ASEAN region. Empirical data from 2021 to 2024 show that, despite a significant increase in enforcement operations from 5,100 to 8,900 cases, the percentage of illegal cigarettes remained stagnant at around 4 to 6 percent. These findings indicate the ineffectiveness of a purely penal approach in changing market dynamics, mainly due to the existence of legal pluralism, which triggers avoidance responses and conflicts between MSME actors and state law. A comparative study of four ASEAN countries, namely the Philippines, Thailand, Malaysia, and Vietnam, confirms that administrative instruments, distribution supervision, and the use of technology play a much more significant role in supporting the effectiveness of law enforcement than criminal instruments. Based on these findings, the study recommends reconstructing the excise law enforcement mechanism by prioritizing the ultimum remedium principle, whereby the application of criminal penalties is used only as a last resort and is focused on syndicates or large-scale perpetrators. Meanwhile, violations committed by MSMEs should be resolved through a Restorative Fiscal Justice approach in accordance with PP 54/2023, which is oriented toward fiscal recovery and supported by the qualitative differentiation of violators and the simplification of licensing procedures.
Reconstruction of the Constitutional Court's Authority from a Negative Legislator to a Positive Legislator for the Sake of Substantive Justice Selviana Teras Widy Rahayu; Boy Nurdin
International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 6 No. 6 (2026): International Journal of Social Service and Research
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/ijssr.v6i6.1413

Abstract

The Constitutional Court of Indonesia, initially established as a negative legislator following Hans Kelsen’s doctrine, possesses the authority to annul laws that contradict the 1945 Constitution. Over the past two decades, strict adherence to this model has revealed critical limitations, as annulment of statutory norms often generates legal vacuums, uncertainty, and potential infringement on citizens’ constitutional rights. This study addresses the evolving role of the Constitutional Court as a positive legislator to ensure substantive justice, particularly when legislative delays hinder the enforcement of citizens’ rights. The research aims to analyze the legal, philosophical, and sociological foundations underpinning this transformation and evaluate the mechanisms through which the Court addresses legal deadlocks. Employing normative legal research, the study examined secondary data from statutory laws, Constitutional Court decisions, legal literature, and scholarly analyses. Data were collected through systematic library research and document review, and analyzed qualitatively using descriptive, interpretative, and conceptual techniques. Findings indicate that the Court’s conditional constitutional and unconstitutional rulings enable the formulation of transitional norms, preventing legal chaos while safeguarding substantive justice. The reconstruction of the Court’s authority allows it to act as an emergency legislator, filling normative gaps without supplanting legislative power. This approach ensures citizens’ constitutional rights are effectively protected, demonstrating a balance between judicial activism and the principles of separation of powers.
Problems of Upstream and Downstream Integration of Rare Earth Metals in the National Mining Legal System Ade Zamrah; Boy Nurdin
Journal Customary Law Vol. 3 No. 3.1 (2026): ICLSSEE Special Collection
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/jcl.v3i3.1.5872

Abstract

Rare Earth Metals play a strategic role in the development of high-tech industries and the global energy transition. Indonesia, a country with abundant mineral resources, faces the challenge of integrating upstream mining activities with downstream policies aimed at increasing added value. This study analyzes the problematic integration of upstream and downstream Rare Earth Metals within the national mining legal system, specifically based on Law Number 3 of 2020 and its implementing regulations, including Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Regulation Number 18 of 2025. The method employs normative legal research with legislative, conceptual, and systemic approaches. The study results reveal a disharmony between extraction-based licensing designs and downstreaming obligations, which have not been integrated from the initial stages of permit issuance. Regulatory fragmentation and overlapping authority between sectors also impact the effectiveness of value-added policies. The absence of an institutional model specifically addressing critical minerals has hindered the development of the national value chain. The study proposes a reconstruction of value chain-based licensing designs, cross-sectoral regulatory harmonization, and the establishment of an integrative institutional model as steps toward industrial sovereignty. This approach is expected to strengthen the sovereignty of Rare Earth Metal management while simultaneously encouraging a sustainable transformation of the strategic resource-based economy.
Reformulation of the Regulations on the Right to Freedom of Expression for Academics in the Digital Space in Enforcing the Crime of Defamation Erdian; Boy Nurdin
Journal Customary Law Vol. 3 No. 3.1 (2026): ICLSSEE Special Collection
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/jcl.v3i3.1.5880

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the problematic enforcement of defamation offenses against academic expression in the digital space and formulate a model for reformulating its regulations based on the protection of academic freedom from the perspective of human rights and a democratic rule of law. The 1945 Republic of Indonesia Constitution, Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights, Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions, the National Criminal Code, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights are all reviewed as part of the normative juridical research method with a statutory and conceptual approach, and relevant Constitutional Court decisions. The research results indicate that Indonesian positive law still faces problems in the form of a dualism of the legal regime between the Criminal Code and the ITE Law, the ambiguity of elements of offenses, such as attacking honor, accusing someone, and public knowledge, and the absence of normative parameters capable of distinguishing scientific criticism from personal attacks. These conditions have triggered the criminalization of lecturers, researchers, experts, and observers, which has resulted in the emergence of a chilling effect and overcriminalization of academic freedom in the digital space. This study proposes a model of ius constituendum through a reformulation of Article 27A of the ITE Law, adding explicit exceptions for academic expression conducted in scientific forums, research publications, and opinions based on scientific methodology, as long as they are conducted in good faith and in the public interest. The reformulation includes the implementation of a balancing test, specific evidentiary standards for scientific expression, indicators of good faith academic criticism, and strengthening non-penal settlement mechanisms through the right of reply, scientific correction, and reputation restoration. This model is expected to achieve proportional legal certainty between reputation protection and academic freedom of expression as pillars of digital democracy.
Karakteristik Filsafat dalam Menghadapi Tantangan Hukum Positif untuk Mencapai Keadilan Sejati Boy Nurdin; Andry Dwiarnanto; Tumpak Parulian Situngkir; Hendro Tri Subiyantoro; Patar Bronson
Mandalika Law Journal Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Mandalika Law Journal
Publisher : Yayasan Baru Haji Samsudin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59613/mlj.v4i1.6597

Abstract

Memahami kebenaran hukum dari karakteristik filsafat dan hukum, harus diawali dengan memahami pengertian dan tujuan hukum itu sendiri. Hukum secara sederhana dapat diartikan sebagai sekumpulan aturan, kaedah yang berasal dari nilai-nilai yang kemudian menjelma menjadi norma. Filsafat hukum memiliki kontribusi besar dalam sejarah perkembangan ilmu hukum yang digali dan di telusuri dari segala sesuatu yang berkaitan dengan hukum. Filsafat hukum mencoba mengkaji bahwa hukum memiliki tujuan-tujuan yang harus di capai sebagai suatu sebab di bentuknya suatu norma hukum, sehingga dalam proses pembuatan produk hukum haruslah bertujuan untuk memberikan dan menjamin keadilan dan kepastian hukum di indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana perspektif filsafat hukum dalam menganalisis tujuan hukum mengenai keadilan dan kepastian dalam rangka mewujudkan kesejahteraan dan kebahagiaan bagi seluruh masyarakat. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normative dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (statuta approach), pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach) yang melihat kemudian di analisis mengenai peranan filsafat hukum dalam sejarah perkembangan filsafat hukum dalam mewujudkan tujuan hukum tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwasannya perspektif filsafat hukum dalam mewujudkan tujuan hukum di indonesia ini dapat dilihat dari praktik penegakan hukumnya. Dalam penegakan hukum di indonesia harus dilaksanakan secara kontekstual dan kasuistik sehingga tujuan hukum dapat diterapkan sesuai kasus hukum yang terjadi, namun begitu pula dengan pembuat undang-undang harus tetap memperhatikan ketiga aspek (keadilan, kepastian dan kemanfaatan) sehingga tujuan hukum ini tetap terjiwai dalam setiap peraturan yang di terapkan dalam kehidupan masyarakat.