Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.864
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Journal of Social Science International Journal of Social Service and Research Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science Journal of Social Research Edunity: Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan INJURITY: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Journal of Social Science Journal of Management, Economic, and Financial Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae Journal of Multidisciplinary Sustainability Asean
Boy Nurdin
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Astronomy Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Neuroscience Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Reconstruction of the Constitutional Court's Authority from a Negative Legislator to a Positive Legislator for the Sake of Substantive Justice Selviana Teras Widy Rahayu; Boy Nurdin
International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 6 No. 6 (2026): International Journal of Social Service and Research
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/ijssr.v6i6.1413

Abstract

The Constitutional Court of Indonesia, initially established as a negative legislator following Hans Kelsen’s doctrine, possesses the authority to annul laws that contradict the 1945 Constitution. Over the past two decades, strict adherence to this model has revealed critical limitations, as annulment of statutory norms often generates legal vacuums, uncertainty, and potential infringement on citizens’ constitutional rights. This study addresses the evolving role of the Constitutional Court as a positive legislator to ensure substantive justice, particularly when legislative delays hinder the enforcement of citizens’ rights. The research aims to analyze the legal, philosophical, and sociological foundations underpinning this transformation and evaluate the mechanisms through which the Court addresses legal deadlocks. Employing normative legal research, the study examined secondary data from statutory laws, Constitutional Court decisions, legal literature, and scholarly analyses. Data were collected through systematic library research and document review, and analyzed qualitatively using descriptive, interpretative, and conceptual techniques. Findings indicate that the Court’s conditional constitutional and unconstitutional rulings enable the formulation of transitional norms, preventing legal chaos while safeguarding substantive justice. The reconstruction of the Court’s authority allows it to act as an emergency legislator, filling normative gaps without supplanting legislative power. This approach ensures citizens’ constitutional rights are effectively protected, demonstrating a balance between judicial activism and the principles of separation of powers.
Co-Authors Anwar Sunarjo Apriaji Setyawan Arief, Ediyanto Asmoro, Dwi Budianto, Azis Dwi Asmoro Fakrulloh, Zudan Arief Handoko Nindyo Wardono Hanif Fonda Juristo Juristo Muhammad Halim Muhammad Halim, Muhammad Muntaha, Sugeng Niken Budi Setyawati Purnomo Santoso, Adi Rozikin, Khoirul Satria Dwi Rahardja Selviana Teras Widy Rahayu Steavanno, Dedet Sugeng Muntaha Suhadi Sukendar Situmorang Taufan, Ridwan Anthony Titin Hartati Ubaidilah Ishaq Wahyu Widodo Wicaksono, Anggi Yudhistira, Dhieno