Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : BISNIS

Walking the Talk on Social Equity: A Call for Advancing the Fourth Pillar of Public Administration Mulyadi, Asal Wahyuni Erlin; Kusumasari, Bevaola; Keban, Yeremias T.
BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi Vol. 25, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Once had been emphasized in the New Public Administration (Frederickson, 1990), equity is subsequently named as thefourth pillar of public administration by the National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) in 2005, together with the other three pillars, namely Economy, Efficiency, and Effectiveness (called as the 4E’s). The pillar of equity emerged with the development of public administration reflecting the success of economic development in both developed and developing countries that still raisen justice issues. Keban (2001) stated that social equity and social justice must be fundamental principles in public administration.Subarsono (2008) and Kumorotomo (2014) also confirmed that for choosing public policy alternatives, one of the variables to consider is “able to promote equity and fairness in society” or guarantee equal resources across the country. Unfortunately, of the four pillars of public administration, the application of equity is still far behind that of the other three pillars: economy, efficiency, and effectiveness (Andrews & Van de Walle, 2012; Wang & Mastracci, 2012; Johnson-III, 2011; Charbonneau & Riccucci, 2008; Miller, Kerr, & Ritter, 2008). To precisely declare social justice as an objective of public policy is still not much of a challenge to the public administrator (Wooldridge & Gooden, 2009). This review is intended to discuss and examine the emerging issue of social equity in public administration and its application on the public policy performance measurement that has not received the same attention as the other three pillars. This is expected to provide an academic contribution to advance equity in the development of public administration particularly in Indonesia.
Defining Social Inclusion for People with Disabilities in Governance: Scoping and Thematic Literature Review Nurhaeni, Ismi Dwi Astuti; Wiratama, Prama; Putri, Intan Sani; Nurdin, Asbiyal; Mulyadi, Asal Wahyuni Erlin; Haryani, Tiyas Nur; Sudibyo, Desiderius Priyo
BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi Vol. 30, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Consensus on a precise definition of social inclusion for people with disabilities remains elusive. This study aims to systematically review the definition of Social Inclusion for People with Disabilities in Governance (SIPDG) based on the related literature and offer basic theoretical insight into what might be considered relevant for establishing a definition of SIPDG. A scoping review was conducted with a qualitative synthesis of literature from SCOPUS. Articles were identified by final keywords of "social inclusion" AND “disability”*. The search produced 8,305 articles, of which 149 articles were included in the scoping review. A coding method was applied in the thematic analysis to identify recurring themes in the definition of SIPDG and generated five key themes delineating SIPDG. These cover the responsible subjects for social inclusion, People with Disabilities (PwD), barriers, disadvantaged areas, and social inclusion measures. The results of this study define SIPDG as an effort made by parties (government institutions, non-government organizations, the community, and PwD themselves) to optimize the existing potential of PwD (physical, intellectual, sensory, and mental disabilities) by eliminating obstacles (economic, structural, cultural, and personal) in various fields (public services, legislation, natural resources, economy, and technology) through the preparation and enactment of regulations, service delivery, provision of infrastructure, participation, and changes in community culture. Future research is expected to map the operational definition of SIPDG.