Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.538
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Dinamisia: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Veteran Law Review Veritas: Jurnal Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam As-Syafiiyah JUSTISI JURNAL HUKUM MEDIA JUSTITIA NUSANTARA JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Jurnal Esensi Hukum Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Law Development Journal Syiah Kuala Law Journal Jurnal Hukum Pelita Indonesia Law Reform Journal (ILREJ) Equality Before The Law Forschungsforum Law Journal Jurnal Hukum Statuta Equality Before The Law
M. Rizki Yudha Prawira
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
Arts Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 18 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Law Development Journal

 1 
Unheard Voices: Analyzing Non-Compliance with the FPIC Principle in Protecting Indigenous Peoples’ Rights in Indonesia Remal Agungta Ketaren, Saher; Prawira, M. Rizki Yudha
Law Development Journal Vol 6, No 4 (2024): December 2024
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.6.4.478-502

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the implementation of the Free, Prior, Informed, and Consent (FPIC) principle as a measure to protect the rights of indigenous communities in Indonesia, by analyzing Decision No. 6/G/LH/2023/PTUN.JPR. In Indonesia, indigenous communities still seem to be overlooked, as their right to make decisions about projects within their traditional territories remains unacknowledged. This situation calls for urgent discussion, as violations of indigenous rights continue to occur, despite such rights are protected by the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This research employs a normative legal approach. The findings, derived from Decision No. 6/G/LH/2023/PTUN.JPR, indicate that the Defendant proceeded to issue the disputed object without facilitating any discussion among the government, company, and the indigenous community. Furthermore, the Second Intervening Defendant failed to include the Plaintiff in the Environmental Impact Assessment (Amdal) process. Additionally, the panel of judges issued a decision that did not adhere to the Guidelines for Adjudicating Environmental Cases. These actions collectively contravene the principle of Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC), which is mandated by both international and national legal frameworks, underscoring the importance of obtaining consent and ensuring participation from indigenous communities.
Co-Authors Aisyah Nurhalizah Aji Lukman Ibrahim Al Fath Anni Alvionita Simanjuntak Aryaputri, Aqila Shafiqa Davilla Prawidya Azharia Diani Sadiawati Falevi, Yunizar Handar Subhandi Bachtiar Hannafiah, Mumtaz Hikmal Yusuf Argiansyah Hilda Novyana Islami, Diajeng Dhea Annisa Aura Muhammad Raihan Yulistio Nada Syifa Nurulhuda Rafif Sani Remal Agungta Ketaren, Saher Rianda Dirkareshza Riyanto Riyanto Siti Helmyati Virna Amalia Nur Permata Wibowo, Hanifah Fairuz