Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.33
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal GEMA TEOLOGIKA : Jurnal Teologi Kontekstual dan Filsafat Keilahian SOSIOHUMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Lumen Veritatis: Jurnal Filsafat dan Teologi Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Nusantara International Journal of Indonesian Philosophy & Theology DISKURSUS Jurnal Filsafat dan Teologi Jurnal Ledalero Proceedings of The National Conference on Indonesian Philosophy and Theology
Petrus Tan
Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira Kupang
Religion Arts Humanities Astronomy Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Rethinking the Deep Ecology: A Response to Climate Change Discourse from the Perspective of Pope Francis’ Laudato Si Tan, Petrus
GEMA TEOLOGIKA: Jurnal Teologi Kontekstual dan Filsafat Keilahian Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Gema Teologika: Jurnal Teologi Kontekstual dan Filsafat Keilahian
Publisher : Faculty of Theology Duta Wacana Christian University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21460/gema.2025.101.1335

Abstract

AbstrakPerubahan iklim merupakan salah satu tantangan global terbesar di zaman kita, yang membawa sejumlah implikasi signifikan bagi manusia dan lingkungan. Namun, sementara perubahan iklim bersifat global,efek negatifnya yang paling parah dirasakan oleh orang-orang miskin di negara-negara miskin yang bergantung pada sumber daya alam. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menanggapi isu perubahan iklim dengan mendalamikembali konsep deep ecology yang dikembangkan filsuf Norwegia, Arne Naess, dari perspektif ensiklik Laudato Si Paus Fransiskus. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif yang meliputi review literatur dan analisis kritis. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa perubahan iklim adalah masalah kompleks yang berakar pada paradigma teknoratis dan antroposentrisme modern. Paradigma teknokratis memainkan peran penting dalam praktik konsumerisme dan sistem ekonomi neoliberal yang mengabaikan kebutuhan orang miskin dan menghancurkan lingkungan. Berbeda dari pemikiran Arne Naess, Laudato Si menawarkan perspektif baru deep ecology dengan beberapa prinsip pokok yang khas, yaitu nilai sakramental ciptaan, ketergantungan antarciptaan, global common good, solidaritas, dan egalitarianisme ekologis. AbstractClimate change is one of the greatest global challenges of our time, with significant implications for human’s life and the environment. However, while climate change is a global issue, its negative effects are most widely felt by the poor in developing countries that depend on natural resources. This research aims to elaborate on the issue of climate change by rethinking the deep ecology, a term coined by Norwegian philosopher, Arne Naess, from Pope Francis’ perspective in his encyclical, Laudato Si. This study uses a qualitative approach, namely a literature review and critical analysis. The research indicates that climate change is a complex issue rooted in the modern technocratic and anthropocentric view of the relationship between humans and the environment. This technocratic paradigm plays an important role in consumerist practices and a neoliberal economic system that abandons the poor and damages the environment. In Laudato Si, Pope Francis offers a new perspective of deep ecology with several main principles, including the sacramental and intrinsic value of creatures, the interdependence and interconnectedness between humans and nature, the global common good, solidarity, and ecological egalitarianism.
Rethinking the Green Economy in Flores: A Dialectical Approach between Deep Ecology of Spinozism and Barong Wae Tradition of the Manggaraian People Tan, Petrus; Kosat, Oktovianus; Turu, Fransiskus Evanodius Roing
Jurnal Ledalero Vol 24, No 1 (2025): Jurnal Ledalero Edisi Juni 2025
Publisher : Institut Filsafat dan Teknologi Kreatif Ledalero

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31385/jl.v24i1.583.%p

Abstract

In recent years, Flores has become a frontier due to government policies that exploit living space, culture, and the rights of local communities. It represents the irony of the government's policy called the Green Economy as a model of development that emphasizes common prosperity without destroying the environment and culture. This research aims to respond further to this issue by proposing a dialectic between the deep ecology of Spinozism and the Barong Wae ritual of the Manggaraian people. The method used in this research is a dialectic approach of the Principle of Expression (critical study of literature) and the Principle of Differentiation (interview key informants). This research indicates that the normative concept of the green economy is inadequate for the sustainability of local communities in Flores. It requires a radical transformation in the human paradigm of nature, creating a green cognitive, followed by green affective, and green psychomotor. The dialectic between the deep ecology of Spinoza and the Barong Wae ritual can encourage this radical paradigm by providing some key concepts, including the intrinsic values of all entities, biosphere egalitarianism, self-realization, and ecological communitarianism. It can be concluded that talking about the green economy is not only about pro-people and pro-profit, but especially pro-ecology.Keywords: Deep Ecology, Spinozism, Barong Wae, Green Economy, Ecological Communitarianism
Meritokrasi, Populisme Kanan, dan Revitalisasi Diskursus Publik: Perspektif Filosofis Michael Sandel Tan, Petrus
Proceedings of The National Conference on Indonesian Philosophy and Theology Vol 2, No 1 (2024): Proceedings of The National Conference on Indonesian Philosophy and Theology
Publisher : Fakultas Teologi, Universitas Sanata Dharma

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24071/snf.v2i1.8484

Abstract

This article aims to elaborate the phenomenon of right-wing populism based on the thought of Michael Sandel on the tyranny of meritocracy. Various previous literatures understand right-wing populism as an anti-pluralism and anti-globalization movement. However, these analyses fail to see that meritocracy has fueled the anger of working class and the losers as expressed in the populist movement. This study uses literature review and critical analysis methods. This study indicates that: 1) Meritocracy is a certain moral belief in individual success that justifies inequality as fair based on the basic principles of liberalism; 2) There are five key theses on meritocracy that trigger right-wing populism, namely: a person's fate is determined by individual success; everyone is responsible for their life; everyone can rise as long as they work hard; social inequality is a problem of person's income which is linear with their hard work; and education is a solution of social inequality; 3) Sandel’s criticism on meritocracy can be an alternative perspective to analyze populism in Indonesia. 4) The challenge of right-wing populism can be answered by revitalizing public discourse. This study concludes that meritocracy is a trigger for the right-wing populism in various democratic countries, including Indonesia.AbstrakArtikel ini bertujuan menganalisis fenomena populisme kanan berdasarkan pemikiran Michael Sandel tentang tirani meritokrasi. Berbagai literatur sebelumnya memahami populisme kanan sebagai gerakan anti-pluralisme dan anti-globalisasi. Namun, analisis-analisis tersebut gagal memahami bahwa meritokrasi telah memicu kemarahan kelas pekerja dan para pecundang yang diekspresikan dalam gerakan populis. Studi ini memakai metode review literatur dan analisis kritis. Studi ini menemukan bahwa: 1) Meritokrasi adalah keyakinan moral tertentu terhadap prestasi individu yang membenarkan ketimpangan sosial sebagai hal yang fair berdasarkan prinsip-prinsip liberalisme; 2) Terdapat lima tesis kunci meritokrasi yaitu: nasib seseorang ditentukan prestasi individu; setiap orang bertanggung jawab atas hidupnya; setiap orang bisa bangkit asalkan bekerja keras; ketimpangan sosial adalah masalah besar-kecilnya penghasilan seseorang yang linear dengan kerja kerasnya; dan pendidikan adalah solusi ketimpangan sosial; 3) Pandangan Sandel dapat menjadi perspektif alternatif untuk membaca populisme di Indonesia. 4) Tantangan populisme kanan dapat dijawab melalui revitalisasi diskursus publik. Studi ini menyimpulkan bahwa meritokrasi merupakan pemicu populisme kanan di berbagai negara demokrasi, termasuk Indonesia.  
Co-Authors AA Sudharmawan, AA Beatrix Yunarti Manehat Darius Naif Eusabius Separera Niron Mario Gonzaga Afeanpah Maximianus Ardon Bidi Medho, Yohana Fransiska Norbertus Jegalus Oktovianus Kosat Turu, Fransiskus Evanodius Roing Yolinda Yanti Sonbay