Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.325
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum MONOGRAF Hasanuddin Law Review Lampung Journal of International Law (LaJIL) Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia VIVA THEMIS- Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia
Ahmad Syofyan
Dosen Bagian Hukum Internasional Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung
Humanities Education Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Prinsip Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Perjanjian Dalam Perspektif Hukum Internasional dan Hukum Islam Ahmad Syofyan; Anggun Nurfani
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 1 JANUARI 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article will discuss international dispute resolution principles according to international law and Islamic law perspectives. In international law, several methods are used to resolve disputes between countries, but the main approach is to use international courts and other common methods such as mediation or arbitration. Similarly, international law in the perspective of Islamic law also emphasizes the method of settlement with the principle of deliberation which prioritizes the principle of justice and avoids injustice. Settlement of disputes in both Islamic law and international law has principles that are in line with both upholding basic principles such as justice, truth, and peace. Settlement through mediation and arbitration is a settlement that is both found in international law and Islamic law, in which some principles are in harmony. By knowing the principles of dispute resolution from these two perspectives and how Islamic law and international law influence the resolution of disputes, it is hoped that it can provide an in-depth insight into how the principles of dispute resolution are used to achieve justice and peace in the international world.  
Tinjauan Normatif terhadap Peran Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja dalam Perlindungan Aset Milik Pemerintah Daerah Palindo, Ahmad Dempo; Ridlwan, Zulkarnain; Yusdianto, Yusdianto; Muhtadi, Muhtadi; Syofyan, Ahmad
VIVA THEMIS Vol 8, No 2 (2025): VIVA THEMIS
Publisher : Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24967/vt.v8i2.4278

Abstract

Local government assets are important resources that must be protected in order to support sustainable development and public services. The Local Government Police Unit (Satpol PP) plays a strategic role in securing local government assets, both through preventive and repressive measures. This study aims to conduct a normative analysis of the legal basis and scope of authority of the Satpol PP in securing local government assets, as well as its contribution in preventing the misuse and illegal occupation of such assets. The method used is a normative legal approach with a literature review of relevant laws and regulations, such as Law No. 23 of 2014 on Regional Government, Government Regulation No. 6 of 2010, as well as relevant regional regulations and governor regulations. The research findings indicate that the Satpol PP has clear and structured authority in securing local government assets, including supervision, enforcement, and administrative actions. Additionally, the Satpol PP's role in preventing asset misuse is carried out through routine patrols, public awareness campaigns, and cross-sectoral coordination. However, the effectiveness of implementing such authority still faces challenges such as limited resources and coordination among local government agencies
Reformulation of Decision-making System in ASEAN Syofyan, Ahmad; Azizah, Siti; Akayleh, Shaker Suleiman Ali Al; Panjaitan, Oksha Dwi Anugrah; Kusworo, Daffa Ladro
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 9 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v9i3.4912

Abstract

ASEAN is a regional organization for Southeast Asia that was established on 8 August 1967 by five ASEAN countries at the time, namely Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand and the Philippines. Today, ASEAN has eleven members with Timor Leste as the youngest member. Like any other international organization, ASEAN has its own decision-making system. The decision-making system in ASEAN before the Charter was only consultation and consensus. That is, decision making based on the agreement of all members and can only be decided if no one refuses, this refers to the Bangkok Declaration. Meanwhile, after the establishment of the 2007 ASEAN Charter, there is a new decision-making system, namely ASEAN Minus-X. A decision-making system that does not rely on the approval of all its members, so that a policy can be decided even if only approved by a few members. This decision-making system can only be done in the economic field. From these two decision-making systems, there are several challenges that exist so that new ideas emerge to reformulate the decision-making system in ASEAN, which is considered relevant to the times and can accommodate all the interests of ASEAN members.
Co-Authors Akayleh, Shaker Suleiman Ali Al Anggun Nurfani Bayu Sujadmiko, Bayu Desy Churul Aini emi eliza emi eliza, emi Heryandi Heryandi Heryandi Heryandi Isroni Muhammad Miraj Mirza Jalil Alejandro Magaldi Serna Kusworo, Daffa Ladro Kyrieleison, Eunike Christine Melly Aida Muhtadi Muhtadi NAEK SIREGAR Natamiharja, Rudi Palindo, Ahmad Dempo Panjaitan, Oksha Dwi Anugrah Rudy Rudy Siti Azizah Yusdianto Yusdianto Zulkarnain Ridlwan