Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.203
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lex Jurnalica (Ilmu Hukum) Jurnal Media Hukum Jurnal Hukum Novelty Jurnal Akta Unes Law Review Jambura Law Review ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan Lampung Journal of International Law (LaJIL) Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) Yuridika Jurnal Hukum Prioris Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Amicus Curiae Jurnal De Lege Ferenda Trisakti
Dinda Keumala
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 38 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 38 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
TUMPANG TINDIH SERTIPIKAT DI KELURAHAN PEGADUNGAN, KOTA ADMINISTRASI JAKARTA BARAT: Overlapping Certificates in Pegadungan Village, West Jakarta Administrative City Desty Rachmawaty; Dinda Keumala
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i1.19540

Abstract

Overlapping certificates are the issuance of two or more certificates describing the same parcel of land. The formulation of the problem in this research is whether the issuance of Title Certificate Number 9567/Pegadungan in the name of Yahya H. Ahmad above Building Rights Title Certificate Number 15596/Pegadungan in the name of PT Cakradigdaya Lokaraya is valid according to the provisions of National Land Law. Normative juridical research type with analytical descriptive research nature and the type of data used is secondary data obtained from the literature study. Data analysis using qualitative method and deductive inference. Conclusion, based on the Certificate of Pegadungan Village Head, the girik used by Yahya H. Ahmad in the issuance of Title Certificate Number 9567/Pegadungan is not registered in Pegadungan Village, so the issuance of Title Certificate Number 9567/Pegadungan is not in accordance with the provisions of National Land Law, namely the Explanation of Article 24 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration.
KEABSAHAN KUITANSI SEBAGAI BUKTI JUAL BELI TANAH MENURUT HUKUM TANAH NASIONAL : Validity of Receipt As Proof of Land Sale According To the National Land Law Elvia Qonitah Maliha; Dinda Keumala
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i1.19600

Abstract

According to the National Land Law, the act of buying and selling land must meet the characteristics of clear, cash-based, and genuine transactions. The issue addressed in this research is the validity of land transactions conducted with receipt evidence, as per the National Land Law and the District Court Decision Number 191/Pdt.G/2021/PN Smg, and how to register the transfer of rights when the seller's whereabouts are unknown, also related to the aforementioned court decision. This study adopts a normative research approach with descriptive analysis. Secondary data obtained from literature studies are utilized, complemented by primary data to support the arguments. The research employs a qualitative analysis method, and conclusions are drawn using the deductive approach. It should be noted that a land transaction conducted solely with a receipt as evidence, without a Sale and Purchase Deed executed before a Land Deed Making Official, cannot be deemed valid according to the National Land Law, as it fails to fulfill the clear transaction nature and the formal requirements of buying and selling.
REKONSTRUKSI KEBIJAKAN TERHADAP PENETAPAN SAKSI PELAKU YANG BEKERJASAMA PADA PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DITINJAU DARI ASPEK KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN ASPEK KEMANFAATAN DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA TERPADU Setiyono Setiyono; Sugeng Supartono; Dinda Keumala; Khairani Bakri
Jurnal De Lege Ferenda Trisakti Volume 1, Nomor 2, September 2023
Publisher : Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/ferenda.v1i2.18280

Abstract

Salah satu dari permasalahan yang muncul dalam proses penegakan hukum di bidang pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi adalah permasalahan yang terkait dengan penetapan status tersangka atau terdakwa sebagai saksi pelaku yang bekerjasama atau justice collaborator. Adanya beberapa permasalahan yang bersumber dari adanya ketidaksamaan pemahaman atau tidak adaya unifikasi kebijakan dalam menetapkan status pelaku sebagai saksi pelaku yang bekerjasama atau justice collaborator oleh para penegak hukum. Selain itu, adanya permasalahan mengenai ketiadaan manfaat yang dialami oleh tersangka atau terdakwa dari penetapan saksi pelaku yang bekerja sama atau justice collaborator tersebut tentunya menimbulkan adanya ketidakpastian hukum dan juga tidak memberikan kemanfaatan atau utilitas bagi pihak yang ditetapkan sebagai saksi pelaku yang bekerja sama atau justice collaborator. Rumusan permasalahan dalam tulisan ini adalah bagaimana pengaturan tentang kebijakan penetapan saksi pelaku yang bekerjasama atau justice collaborator dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi dan bagaimana rekonstruksi kebijakan penetapan Saksi Pelaku Yang Bekerjasama (Justice Collaborator) dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi yang memberikan aspek kepastian hukum dan aspek kemanfaatan dalam sebuah sistem peradilan pidana terpadu. Tipe penelitian yang digunakan adalah normatif, dengan menggunakan pendekatan Undang-Undang dan regulasi lainnya. Sifat penelitian deskriptif, dengan menggunakan data sekunder. Analisis penelitian dilakukan dengan cara kualitatif dan metode penarikan kesimpulan secara deduktif. Pada prakteknya terdapat berbagai maca regulasi yang mengatur tentang tentang kebijakan penetapan saksi pelaku yang bekerjasama atau justice collaborator dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi. Pengaturan tersebut mulai dalam bentuk Undang-Undang sampai dengan bentuk Peraturan Bersama dari lembaga penegak hukum dan Surat Edaran. Berpedoman dari adanya keanekaragaman pengaturan maka diperlukan rekonstruksi kebijakan pembentukan norma hukum baru dalam bentuk Undang-Undang yang menjadi pedoman mengikat terhadap pengakuan atau rekognisi dan pemahaman atau persepsi yang sama secara hukum mengenai penetapan status saksi pelaku yang bekerjasama atau justice collaborator yang berlaku sejak mulai tahapan pemeriksaan di tingkat penyidikan sampai dengan tahapan pemeriksaan di tingkat pengadilan bahkan sampai dengan pelaksanaan eksekusinya demi terciptanya asas kepastian hukum dan memberikan kemanfaatan atau utilitas bagi tersangka atau terdakwa yang ditetapkan sebagai saksi pelaku yang bekerjasama atau justice collaborator
PERBANDINGAN HAK PENGUASAAN ATAS TANAH ANTARA NEGARA INDONESIA DENGAN NEGARA KEPULAUAN SOLOMON Dhea Nadhifa Vrily Pontoh; Dinda Keumala
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 3 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i3.13830

Abstract

Comparative Law is the confrontation of comparable elements of two legal systems to find their differences and similarities. Land tenure rights in Indonesia and Solomon Islands. The formulation of the problem is; what are the similarities and differences between the Land Tenure Rights between the State of Indonesia and the Solomon Islands? and what are the factors causing differences in Land Tenure Rights between the State of Indonesia and the Solomon Islands? The method of legal research is normative and is descriptive-comparitive, secondary data which is analyzed qualitatively, and the conclusion is drawn using the deductive method. The results of this research, discussion and conclusion are, there are similarities in Indonesia and the Solomon Islands regarding land tenure rights, namely the meaning of land tenure rights, the existence of customary land tenure rights, individual rights to land in the form of property rights & perpetual estate, and arrangements for the subject of land rights holders. In addition to similarities, differences arise in the form of regulation of land tenure rights, the use of hierarchy in land tenure rights, systematics in land tenure rights in the form of state control rights with public (crown) land.
PENDAFTARAN PERALIHAN HAK ATAS TANAH KARENA JUAL BELI YANG DIBUAT DIBAWAH TANGAN (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NO. 116/PDT.G/2019/BKN) Rurrie Putri Mutiara Sari; Dinda Keumala
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 3 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i3.13841

Abstract

The transfer of land rights in a sale and purchase must be carried out in front of an authorized official (PPAT) by making a Sale and Purchase Deed as evidence for the process of transferring land rights/title at the Land Office. The formulation of this research problem is how is the validity of the transfer of land rights due to the sale and purchase of land made under the hand? What must the buyer do to register the transfer of land rights made under the hand based on Decision No. 116/Pdt.G/2019/Bkn? Normative juridical research method. Secondary data collection technique. The nature of the research used is descriptive analytical. This research is analyzed qualitatively. The method of drawing conclusions with the deductive logic method. The results of research, discussion and conclusions, especially in the case of Decision No.116/Pdt.G/2019/Bkn Bangkinang that the sale and purchase of land under the hand is valid because it has fulfilled the material requirements in buying and selling, but has not fulfilled the formal requirements because the sale and purchase is carried out only with a letter under the hand, a Sale and Purchase Deed has not been made before a PPAT.
PERBANDINGAN KEPEMILIKAN SRS DENGAN APARTEMEN UNTUK ORANG ASING DI INDONESIA DAN THAILAND Intan Monika; Dinda Keumala
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 3 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i3.13842

Abstract

High population growth is the reason people choose to live in vertical housing because land in big cities is increasingly limited and land prices are getting higher. The large number of foreign workers in Indonesia also adds to the density of housing in big cities. The problem formulation is the ownership similarity of flats and apartments for foreigners in Indonesia and Thailand, what are the differences in ownership of flats with ownership of apartments for foreigners in Indonesia and Thailand, what causes similarities and differences in ownership of flats with ownership of apartments for foreigners in Indonesia and Thailand. Normative juridical research method, descriptive research nature, conclusion drawing using deductive logic. The results of the research, discussion and conclusions, similarities: land ownership, both countries prohibit foreigners from owning land; The difference: the term mentioning the unit, Indonesia uses the unit of flats and Thailand uses the term of Apartment; quota limit of unit ownership, Thailand regulates foreigners may not own apartments more than 49% of the total units while Indonesia is not regulated. The cause of the similarities between the two countries is the increasing demand for residential needs for foreigners.
PEMBAGIAN HARTA WARISAN ALMARHUM MARABEN DAN MEIDA SM M PANGGABEAN MENURUT KUHPERDATA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 151/PDT.G/2020/PN JKT PST) Tantri Benaz Cindy Siregar; Dinda Keumala
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 3 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i3.13843

Abstract

Regarding Decision Number 151/Pdt.G/2020/PN Jkt Pst where there was a dispute over the inheritance of the late Retired General Maraben and Meida SM M Panggabean, thus making the author to conduct further research with the formulation of the problem of how the distribution of the inheritance of the late Retired General Maraben and Meida SM M Panggabean to their heirs according to the Civil Code, and whether the contents of Decision Number 151/Pdt. G/2020/PN Jkt Pst regarding the division of the estate of the late Retired General Maraben and Meida SM M Panggabean is in accordance/not according to the Civil Code. The research was normative legal method, descriptive analytical, secondary data type, conducted qualitatively, deductive logic inference. The results of research, discussion and conclusions: the distribution of the estate of the late Retired General Maraben and Meida SM M Panggabean to their heirs according to the Civil Code, namely Duma (3/16) part, Musida (3/16) part, Tetty (3/16) part and Baringin (7/16) part and the contents of Court Decision Number 151/Pdt.G/2020/PN Jkt Pst regarding the distribution of the estate of the late Retired General Maraben and Meida SM M Panggabean to their heirs are not in accordance with the Civil Code.
PENGATURAN RESTRUKTURISASI PEMBIAYAAN DI BANK SYARIAH INDONESIA SELAMA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19 Mega Ayu Putri Lestari; Dinda Keumala
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 3 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i3.13847

Abstract

During the Covid-19 pandemic, one of the reliefs provided by the Government was restructuring. The restructuring instruction is regulated in the Financial Services Authority Regulation No. 11/POJK.03/2020 concerning National Economic Stimulus as Countercyclical Impact of the Spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 as amended by POJK No. 48/POJK.03/2020 and last amended by POJK No. 17/POJK.03/2021. In this case, the Financial Services Authority Regulation is still very general in nature so that the Financial Services Authority instructs the bank to include several provisions in the Bank's Internal Guidelines. The formulation of the problem is how the suitability of restructuring arrangements and differences in restructuring arrangements based on the Financial Services Authority Regulation on National Economic Stimulus as Countercyclical Impact of the Spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 with restructuring based on Bank Syariah Indonesia Internal Regulations. The research method is normative, descriptive in nature, secondary data supplemented by interviews, qualitative data analysis, and deductive logic. The results of the research, discussion and conclusions; Bank Syariah Indonesia's Internal regulations are in accordance with the Financial Services Authority Regulations with some additional special provisions that are generally regulated in the Financial Services Authority Regulations prevent massive customer defaults at the end the restructuring.
PROBLEMATIKA PENETAPAN SAKSI PELAKU YANG BEKERJASAMA PADA PERKARA KORUPSI DITINJAU DARI SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA TERPADU Setiyono, Setiyono; Supartono, Sugeng; Keumala, Dinda; Bakri, Khairani
Lex Jurnalica Vol 21, No 1 (2024): LEX JURNALICA
Publisher : Lex Jurnalica

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47007/lj.v21i1.7714

Abstract

AbstractOne of the problems that arise in the law enforcement process in the field of eradicating criminal acts of corruption is the problem related to determining the status of a suspect or defendant as a witness to a cooperating perpetrator. These problems stem from unequal understanding or lack of policy unification in determining the status of perpetrators as perpetrator witnesses who cooperate with law enforcers. The formulation of the problem in this paper is how the problems arise in the regulation of the policy for determining cooperating witnesses in cases of criminal acts of corruption and how to reconstruct the policy for determining cooperating witnesses in cases of criminal acts of corruption which is based on the principles of mutual coordination, aspects of legal certainty and aspects of usefulness in an integrated criminal justice system. The type of research used is normative, using an approach to laws and other regulations. In practice, there are various kinds of regulations that regulate policies for determining perpetrator witnesses who cooperate in corruption cases. Therefore, with the emergence of the problem of the diversity of regulations regarding the determination of cooperating witnesses, an integrated policy reconstruction is needed in the form of the formation of new legal norms in the form of a law which becomes an integrative guideline.  Keywords : Justice Collaborator, Corruption Case, Integrated Criminal Justice System. AbstrakSalah satu dari problematika yang muncul dalam proses penegakan hukum di bidang pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi adalah problematika yang terkait dengan penetapan status tersangka atau terdakwa sebagai saksi pelaku yang bekerjasama. Problematika tersebut bersumber dari adanya ketidaksamaan pemahaman atau tidak adaya unifikasi kebijakan dalam menetapkan status pelaku sebagai saksi pelaku yang bekerjasama oleh para penegak hukum. Rumusan permasalahan dalam tulisan ini adalah bagaimana problematika yang muncul dalam pengaturan tentang kebijakan penetapan saksi pelaku yang bekerjasama dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi dan bagaimana rekonstruksi terhadap kebijakan penetapan Saksi Pelaku Yang Bekerjasama dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi yang didasarkan pada asas saling koordinasi, aspek kepastian hukum dan aspek kemanfaatan dalam sebuah sistem peradilan pidana terpadu. Tipe penelitian yang digunakan adalah normatif, dengan menggunakan pendekatan Undang-Undang dan regulasi lainnya. Pada prakteknya terdapat berbagai macam regulasi yang mengatur tentang tentang kebijakan penetapan saksi pelaku yang bekerjasama dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi. Oleh karena itu, dengan munculnya problematika keanekaragaman pengaturan tentang penetapan saksi pelaku yang bekerjasama tersebut maka diperlukan sebuah rekonstruksi kebijakan yang terintegrasi berupa pembentukan norma hukum baru dalam bentuk Undang-Undang yang menjadi pedoman yang bersifat integratif   Kata kunci: Saksi Pelaku Yang Bekerjasama, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu.
PEMBATALAN AKTA NOTARIS: MEKANISME DAN PENYEBABNYA Keumala, Dinda
Lex Jurnalica Vol 21, No 2 (2024): LEX JURNALICA
Publisher : Lex Jurnalica

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47007/lj.v21i2.7924

Abstract

AbstractA Notary Deed is an authentic deed made by or before a Notary at the request of interested parties to be stated in the deed. In practice, the parties who have made the Notary deed want the Notary deed that has been made to be canceled for various reasons. The problem in this study is what is the mechanism for canceling notary deeds and what is the cause of the cancellation of notary deeds. This study uses a normative research type with the nature of descriptive research. Secondary data collection is carried out by literature methods and qualitative data analysis. The process of concluding is carried out by the deductive method. The results obtained from this study are that the mechanism for canceling the deed can be carried out by making a deed of cancellation in front of a Notary or filing a lawsuit for cancellation of the deed in the District Court. The cause of the cancellation of the Notary deed can be based on the agreement of the parties, one of the parties is in default, does not comply with the procedure for making a Notary Deed by the Notary Position Law and its amendments, the Notary is not authorized to do the deed, the substance of the deed is not by the applicable legal provisions, the deed is formally defective and the deed made is detrimental to one of the parties in the deed.Keywords: Annulment, Deed, Notary  AbstrakAkta Notaris adalah akta otentik yang dibuat oleh atau dihadapan Notaris atas permintaan para pihak yang berkepentingan untuk dinyatakan dalam suatu akta. Dalam prakteknya, para pihak yang telah membuat akta Notaris menghendaki agar akta Notaris yang telah dibuat dibatalkan dengan berbagai macam alasan. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimanakah mekanisme pembatalan akta notaris dan apakah yang menjadi penyebab dibatalkannya akta notaris. Penelitian ini menggunakan tipe penelitian normatif dengan sifat penelitian deskriptif. Pengumpulan data sekunder dilakukan dengan metode kepustakaan dan analisis data menggunakan analisis kualitatif. Metode penarikan kesimpulan dilakukan dengan metode deduktif. Hasil yang diperoleh dari penelitian ini bahwa mekanisme pembatalan akta dapat dilakukan dengan membuat akta pembatalan dihadapan Notaris atau mengajukan gugatan pembatalan akta di Pengadilan Negeri. Penyebab dibatalkannya akta Notaris bisa berdasarkan kesepakatan para pihak, salah satu pihak wanprestasi,  tidak memenuhi prosedur pembuatan Akta Notaris sesuai dengan Undang-undang Jabatan Notaris dan perubahannya, Notaris tidak berwenang untuk membuat akta, substansi akta tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan hukum yang berlaku, aktanya cacat formil dan akta yang dibuat merugikan salah satu pihak dalam akta tersebut.Kata kunci : Pembatalan, Akta, Notaris
Co-Authors Abdill Hannandi Abdill Hannandi Adi Wiratno, Adi Agung Daniel Panogari Simanjuntak Almadinatulmunawaroh, Elya Arranchado, Jimi Rambo Az, M. Fariduddin Bakri, Khairani Balqies, Izzah Bayuaji, Anandayu Pavita Desty Rachmawaty Dhea Nadhifa Vrily Pontoh Dian Purnamasari Edgar Joseph Elvia Qonitah Maliha Fauzia Rahmitha Sari I Gede Yudi Arsawan Ignatius Pradipa Probondaru Ikhwan bin Mohd Zain, Muhamad Intan Monika Kadir, Anita Kalisha Athallah Dyaniputri Khairani Bakri Maliha, Elvia Qonitah Mega Ayu Putri Lestari Namira Muna Salsabila Nursantih, Nadia Pahlevi, Ahmad Gozzy Putri, Febby Permata Rachmawaty, Desty Rahmat, Nur Ezan Rurrie Putri Mutiara Sari Sabirin, Ahmad Setiawati, Anda Setiyono Setiyono Setiyono Setiyono Sugeng Supartono Supartono, Sugeng Suzaini, Syaqila Binte Tantri Benaz Cindy Siregar Yuandha Kurnia Setiawan