Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

Implementasi Open Door Policy dalam Menangani Pengungsi Ukraina di Jerman Aya Sofia Wardul Muna; Takdir Ali Mukti
Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Vol 6, No 4 (2024): Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), May
Publisher : Mahesa Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34007/jehss.v6i4.2126

Abstract

Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan tentang kontribusi sebuah negara dalam menangani krisis pengungsi akibat perang dalam konteks alasan kemanusiaan. Masalah difokuskan pada studi kasus penggunaan kebijakan open door Jerman tentang program penanganan pengungsi Ukraina di Jerman yang diwarnai dengan pro-kontra secara internal di parlemen. Kebijakan open door bertujuan untuk membuka perbatasan selebar-lebarnya yang memungkinkan penerimaan pencari suaka tanpa batas. Program penanganan untuk pengungsi Ukraina tersebut meliputi temporary protection, integrasi pengungsi, subsidi tempat tinggal, medical care, dan tunjangan kesejahteraan sosial. Kerangka teoritik yang digunakan untuk mendekati masalah ini mengacu pada konsep kebijakan luar negeri. Data-data dalam penelitian ini dikumpulkan melalui metode studi kepustakaan melalui 4 tahapan, yakni pengumpulan dan seleksi data, penyajian data, analisis data dan penarikan kesimpulan. Temuan penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa keberhasilan penanganan dari pemerintah Jerman kepada pengungsi Ukraina tetap menemui tantangan berupa pendaan yang memaksa Jerman untuk menyetujui kebijakan migrasi yang lebih ketat. Selain itu, terdapat pula diskriminasi yang terjadi antara pengungsi Ukraina dan Suriah yaitu pada kebijakan penanganan yang diberlakukan. Alasan diskriminasi paling banyak adalah karena masalah ras dan perbedaan budaya. Argumen penelitian ini bahwa dalam praktiknya latar belakang seorang pengungsi mempengaruhi pelayanan dan penanganan yang akan didapatkannya di Jerman.
Kepentingan Nasional Suriah Dalam Upaya Penyelesaian Konflik Bersenjata di Idlib, Suriah dari tahun 2016-2017 Abadi, Fany Anggun; Muhammad, Ali; Mukti, Takdir Ali
Jurnal ICMES Vol 6 No 2 (2022): Jurnal ICMES: The Journal of Middle East Studies
Publisher : Indonesia Center for Middle East Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35748/jurnalicmes.v6i2.130

Abstract

Abstract The fighting in Idlib in 2016-2017 under bashar Al-Assad's rule and how it affected Syria's national interests. The civil conflict in Syria resulting from the Arab spring is almost entering its 10th year, leaving Idlib as the last door bar. The involvement of foreign actors gives an indication of the complexity of the conflict in Syria. the author gets a formulation of the problem in the form of: National Interest in Efforts to Resolve Armed Conflict in Idlib, Syria from 2016-2017. The purpose of this study is to find out the relevance of the fighting in Idlib to Syria's national security. This research was conducted using a qualitative method using a descriptive analysis approach and secondary data collection techniques obtained through literature studies in this case sourced from books, as well as journal articles. Furthermore, the concept of national interest is positioned as an analytical tool in the battle of Idlib, where one of the aspects contained in it is about national security. Based on the analysis using this concept, researchers found that the fighting that took place in Idlib would largely determine the continuity of the Syrian conflict, especially in the field of the country's national security. Keywords : Idlib, UN Security Council, Armed Conflict
The Revocation of Kashmir’s Special Status by Narendra Modi Administration in 2019 Setyorini, Fitri Adi; Mukti, Takdir Ali
Nation State: Journal of International Studies Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Economics and Social Science, Department of International Relations, Universitas Amikom Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24076/NSJIS.2020v3i2.233

Abstract

Kashmir has a special status under Article 370 and 35A of the Indian Constitution, which granted special autonomy of Kashmir. The paper examines the reasons behind the Indian government's policy under Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to revoke the special status of Kashmir. The question is, why the Indian government revoked the special status of Kashmir in 2019 when the special status has been entrenched in the last 73 years ago. The objective of this research is to identify the reasons behind the Indian government's policy to revoke the special status of Kashmir. By a qualitative research, the findings show that the existence of economic interests is the background for revoking the special status of Kashmir. The research argues that the Indian business group (Taipan) as a major milestone in the success of Narendra Modi campaigns in 2014 and 2019 elections, demanding the Indian government to eliminate regulatory barriers between the center and the regions, to create a national market without any restrictions. Demands given by Taipan cause the dynamics between the central and local governments. This research is expected to assist the development of international relations in political economy studies.
Leveraging Asymmetric Relations in Sister City Relationships Sinambela, Stivani Ismawira; Al-Fadhat, Faris; Mukti, Takdir Ali; Warsito, Tulus
Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS) Vol 14, No 1 (2025): Published in May 2025
Publisher : Andalas Institute of International Studies UNAND

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/ajis.14.1.15-31.2025

Abstract

This research analyzes the Sister City collaboration model that influences the success of economic cooperation between local governments. Sister City Relationship (SCR) is a form of subnational diplomacy that connects cities across countries through formal agreements, aiming to promote economic, cultural, and social cooperation. However, many SCR initiatives remain symbolic and fail to generate tangible benefits. This study proposes a more strategic approach by examining how asymmetry between cities can enhance economic cooperation. The theoretical framework adopts an asymmetric approach, arguing that mutual compatibility can emerge from unequal relationships. Compatibility is operationalized through indicators such as: (1) Area, (2) Gross Domestic Products (GDP) and (3) Human Development Index (HDI), which reflect the economic and developmental capacity of a city or region. A coupling model is used to categorize relationships into Big-Small and Small-Big pairings, referring respectively to partnerships where a big Local Cities collaborates with a smaller Foreign Cities, and vice versa. These asymmetric configurations are found to be more effective than symmetrical pairings, which often struggle with overlapping interests and lack of reciprocity. Empirical findings based on selected SCR cases in Indonesia such as Bandung, Surabaya and Medan, shows that coupling cities with complementary resources, rather than equal status, enables more dynamic and outcome-driven engagements. The study offers both theoretical and practical contribution for designing more strategic and resource-based asymmetric relations.