Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 32 Documents
Search

The Fusion of the Bologna Process, Liberal Arts Education, and Indonesian Educational Transformation Ideas in the MBKM Policy Hidayat, Rahmad
Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Politik Lokal Vol 6 No 1 (2024): JGLP, MEI 2024
Publisher : Universitas Pancasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47650/jglp.v6i1.1262

Abstract

Higher education in Indonesia is undergoing a vital transformation through the presence of the MBKM (Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka) policy, which combines the principles of the Bologna Process (BP) and Liberal Arts Education (LAE) to create an inclusive and dynamic learning environment. Under this context, this article aims to investigate the urgency and implications of combining the BP paradigm, LAE, and the idea of Indonesian educational transformation embedded in the MBKM policy and present the findings through a narrative overview approach that involves in-depth analysis of literature related to BP, LAE, and MBKM implementation in Indonesia. Through a narrative overview process, this article highlights the importance of academic freedom, a holistic approach, and the role of students as active agents in the learning process. The research findings confirm that MBKM is a step forward in providing relevant and responsive higher education in Indonesia. The fusion of the BP and LAE paradigms in MBKM holds a strong foundation for inclusive learning oriented towards preparing students with critical skills, adaptability and social responsibility. Thus, this article presents a complete understanding of the urgency and implications of combining the BP and LAE paradigms in MBKM and accentuates the importance of innovative interventions preparing students to become skilled and knowledgeable leaders in an era that continues to change rapidly.
Beyond Administrative Formalities: Village Fund Oversight, Corruption, and Social Accountability in Bima Regency Ishaka, Mukhlis; Hidayat, Rahmad
Jurnal Ranah Publik Indonesia Kontemporer (Rapik) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/rapik.v5i2.119

Abstract

Existing studies on village governance and public accountability have largely focused on institutional and structural drivers of corruption, often overlooking the interplay between administrative practices, local power dynamics, and perpetrator motivations. Accountability failures are shaped by these interactions as much as by formal structures. This study examines village fund oversight in Mawu and Waduruka Villages, Bima Regency, Indonesia. Using a qualitative case study, the authors collected data through field observations, document analysis, and in-depth interviews with village officials, members of the Village Consultative Body (BPD), community representatives, government auditors, village facilitators, and corruption perpetrators. Key findings include: (1) Oversight is predominantly focused on procedures and compliance with regulations, which allows genuine accountability to be hidden; (2) Administrative approaches, along with limited ability of institutions to perform their functions, minimal resources for financial review (auditing), and deeply rooted relationships between patrons (people in power) and clients (dependent supporters), directly lead to fake documents, inflated budgets, and fictional activities; (3) Citizen participation is disjointed and mainly reactive, occurring after corruption comes to light; (4) The idea of the 'administrative formality trap'—where official systems for accountability exist but meaningful evaluation or enforcement is missing—shows that such systems can unintentionally allow corruption. These findings together offer a more complete