Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.037
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Devotion: Journal of Research and Community Service International Journal of Social Service and Research Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science Journal of Social Research Journal Of World Science Edunity: Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan INJURITY: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Journal Of Law Sciences (Legisci) Journal of Community Service (Abdisci) Asian Journal of Social and Humanities Indonesian Cyber Law Review
Anom Sutrisno
Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati
Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Kajian Hukum dalam Rehabilitasi Tindak Pidana Narkotika terhadap Pelaku Penyalahgunaan bagi Dirinya Sendiri Ardiansyah Firdaus; Alip Rahman; Anom Sutrisno
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 12 (2026): Tema Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i12.4301

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal regulations for perpetrators of self-abuse of narcotics who meet the rehabilitation criteria and the judge's legal considerations in Decision Number 372/Pid.Sus/2024/PN.Sbr. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory regulatory approach, a case approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that rehabilitation has been regulated in Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 4 of 2010 and Joint Regulation of 2014. The decision has correctly applied Article 127 paragraph (1) letter a, but the judge's considerations have not comprehensively explained the reasons for not implementing rehabilitation, so that the orientation of punishment still emphasizes imprisonment rather than a rehabilitative approach.
Co-Authors Adib Adib Adit Hartadi Agus Dimyati Alip Rahman Alip Rahman Ardiansyah Firdaus Ariq Muzaffar Wahyu Azizah, Nur Alma Chabibaturrochbiyyah Chabibaturrochbiyyah Dhanu Hariwijaya Dimyati, Agus Fadhli Ghifari SP Fadlilyani Ainusyamsi Faturachman, Dadan Taufik Feri Wangi Fikriyansyah, Arisy Galih Pratisto, Andito Gina Nurfaidah Harliyanto, Rois Herry Irfanto Ika Putri, Dessy Imam Al Hakim Irgi Setiawan Jenitasari, Silviyanica Kemas Adhitya Luthfi Lita Martia M.Ali Iskandar Maharani, Deswita Maulida, Irma Meri Handayani, Meri Moh Abyan Nurfikri Muhammad Mahesa Rizki Diputra Muzaffar Wahyu, Ariq Nabilatus Sabila Noupel, Muhamad Pratisto, Andito Galih Rafli Wahyu Indrianto Rahman, Alip Ricko Satriatama Rido, Muhammad Rasyid Rifqi Alif Darmawan Rizki Maulana, Rizki Sabela, Adine Setiawan, Irgi Shafira Zahru Visia Nurmalita Trully