Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.232
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Qisth Law Review JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Journal Equity of Law and Governance Jurnal Inovasi Pengabdian Masyarakat Pendidikan Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Hartati, Sawitri Yuli
Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Ad Hoc di Indonesia: Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung dalam Sengketa Konstruksi Sabitaqila Suma Farhaniatussafana; Tri Utami; Sawitri Yuli Hartati
Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry Vol 1 No 3 (2026): March: Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/a60t2p42

Abstract

This study examines the legal foundation and judicial reasoning applied by the Supreme Court of Indonesia in reviewing requests for annulment of ad hoc arbitration awards in construction disputes, focusing on how judges interpret the limited grounds for annulment under Law No. 30/1999. The analysis demonstrates that the Court consistently upholds the principle of finality while maintaining a strict supervisory threshold to ensure that the arbitration process remains free from fraud, hidden documents, or procedural manipulation. Construction disputes, which frequently involve complex technical assessments and high contractual risks, require judges to evaluate whether the alleged violations genuinely undermine the legitimacy of the arbitral process rather than merely reflect dissatisfaction with the decision. Findings show a clear judicial pattern that prioritizes procedural integrity over substantive reconsideration of the dispute, aligning national jurisprudence more closely with prevailing international standards. This approach strengthens legal certainty for construction-sector stakeholders while reinforcing the credibility of ad hoc arbitration as an efficient dispute resolution mechanism in Indonesia.
Perlindungan Hukum Wakaf Produktif di Indonesia: Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Agama Pandeglang Nomor 405/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Pdlg Sabitaqila Suma Farhaniatussafana; Sheira Syaharani Kuan; Tri Utami; Sawitri Yuli Hartati
Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry Vol 1 No 3 (2026): March: Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/jqm26r94

Abstract

This study examines the legal protection of productive waqf in Indonesia by analyzing the normative framework, administrative governance, and judicial considerations applied in the decision of the Pandeglang Religious Court Number 405/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Pdlg. The research employs a normative juridical method supported by a case-based analytical approach to understand how statutory provisions, waqf documentation, and factual findings influence the validation of a waqf asset. The study highlights that the reliability of waqf documents, the transparency of the nadzir’s management, and the consistency of field evidence are central to judicial reasoning in determining the legal certainty of productive waqf. It further identifies that the effectiveness of waqf protection depends on the integration of Islamic legal principles, statutory regulations, and institutional practice. Strengthened administrative systems, professional governance, and harmonized legal interpretation are needed to ensure that waqf assets maintain their perpetual purpose and fulfill their social and economic functions. Overall, the research provides a comprehensive view of how legal certainty is established in productive waqf disputes.
Pencabutan Permohonan Dalam Praktik Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase Muhammad Rajha Wardhiyani; Yudi Gunawan; Sawitri Yuli Hartati
Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry Vol 1 No 3 (2026): March: Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/jymb6328

Abstract

This study examines the withdrawal of applications in arbitration dispute resolution practices in Indonesia from a normative legal perspective. Arbitration is designed as an efficient, final, and binding mechanism for resolving disputes outside the court system; however, the practice of withdrawing arbitration applications raises legal uncertainty due to the absence of explicit regulatory provisions. Law Number 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution does not comprehensively regulate the procedures, requirements, or legal consequences of such withdrawals. As a result, arbitration institutions apply differing approaches, which may affect procedural consistency and legal certainty. This research employs a normative juridical method by analyzing statutory regulations, arbitration institutional rules, Constitutional Court decisions, and relevant legal doctrines. The findings indicate that the lack of clear legal standards allows potential misuse of withdrawal rights and creates disparities in arbitration practice. In the context of sharia arbitration, this issue also relates to ethical principles and the protection of fairness in muamalah transactions. Therefore, strengthening legal norms and institutional guidelines regarding the withdrawal of arbitration applications is essential to ensure justice, legal certainty, and the credibility of arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism in Indonesia.
Prinsip Keabadian Manfaat dalam Hukum Wakaf: Telaah Filosofis dan Implikasinya bagi Pemberdayaan Umat Ramzy Ilya Dzimar; Achmad Rafli Weking; Fikri Erlangga; Sawitri Yuli Hartati
Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry Vol 1 No 3 (2026): March: Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/yj1c0n38

Abstract

The principle of perpetuity of benefit in waqf law represents a fundamental concept that connects religious devotion with sustainable social welfare. Waqf is not merely the act of transferring assets, but a long-term commitment to ensuring continuous benefits for society across generations. This study examines the philosophical foundations of the perpetuity of benefit in Islamic law and analyzes its legal formulation within the Indonesian waqf regulatory framework. Using a normative juridical and philosophical approach, the research highlights how Islamic legal principles, national legislation, and institutional practices interact in preserving the sustainability of waqf benefits. The findings indicate that the realization of perpetual benefit depends on professional waqf management, strong institutional support, effective supervision, and adaptive utilization of productive waqf instruments. Moreover, innovation in waqf management, including cash waqf and digital waqf, must remain aligned with sharia objectives and legal certainty. Ultimately, strengthening the principle of perpetuity of benefit positions waqf as a strategic instrument for empowering communities and supporting sustainable socio-economic development.
Sharia Insurance Disputes Through Sharia Arbitration: A Legal Discourse Sawitri Yuli Hartati; Sodikin
Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): GJMI - Maret
Publisher : PT. Gudang Pustaka Cendekia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59435/gjmi.v4i3.2072

Abstract

Sharia insurance in Indonesia is growing, because along with the increasingly complex disputes between parties, which cannot be avoided between Islamic insurance companies and policyholders, this is even though both of them help and protect each other. The problem is regarding the legal basis for sharia insurance dispute resolution which is still scattered in several laws and regulations. This has become a discourse and issue of legal norms for sharia arbitration as an option for sharia insurance dispute resolution, and so far the resolution of sharia insurance disputes through sharia arbitration is regulated by Supreme Court Regulation Number 14 of 2016. The research method used is descriptive normative. The research method used is descriptive normative by analyzing regulations laws governing sharia dispute resolution. The results of this study explain that state policy in managing sharia insurance disputes is still a discourse, so that constitutional authority still uses Article 58 of Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Therefore, it is necessary to amend Law No. 30 of 1999, specifically regarding the article regarding the District Court, which must be supplemented by the Religious Courts and procedures for resolving disputes through sharia arbitration.
Co-Authors Achmad Rafli Weking Aira Salsabila Aisyiah Ananda Alika Nasywa Nirwasita Aniqa Dirsya Aroyandini, Elvara Norma Elsa Fitriani Hasnani Faturrahman Aziz Febry Amirullah Fikri Erlangga Keisya Lintang Kurniawan . Muhammad Guntur Alting Muhammad Rajha Wardhiyani Muhammad Rusdi Daud Muhammad Sulthan Faraby Nadia Kaila Ahmad Nadia Maisyakilla Nazwa Salsabila Rahmadina Nurohmat Nurohmat Rabiatul Adawiyah Rahma Aulia Putri Ramzy Ilya Dzimar Rifat Zharfan Noor Andryan Sa'diyah Sa'diyah Sabitaqila Suma Farhaniatussafana Saskia Nur Khansa Shafa Aurelia Putri Kusumaningtyas Sheira Syaharani Kuan Siti Afiyah Sodikin Sodikin Tri Utami Tubagus Heru Dharma Wijaya Yudi Gunawan