Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.093
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Risalah : Jurnal Imu Syariah dan Hukum KUMPULAN JURNAL DOSEN UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SUMATERA UTARA Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Unes Law Review Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Randwick International of Social Science Journal Jurnal Somasi (Sosial Humaniora Komunikasi) Humantech : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CULTURAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE Proceeding International Seminar of Islamic Studies Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Indonesian Journal Education KOLONI INSPIRING LAW JOURNAL Realism: Law Review International Journal of Society and Law
Lilawati Ginting
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Astronomy Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 28 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 28 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
TINJAUAN HUKUM ATAS JAMINAN DALAM PEMBIAYAAN MODAL VENTURA BERDASARKAN PERATURAN OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN NOMOR 35 TAHUN 2015 Ummi Adhillah Nasution; Lilawati Ginting
Realism: Law Review Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): Realism: Law Review
Publisher : Sabtida

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71250/rlr.v2i3.48

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran modal ventura sebagai lembaga pembiayaan non bank di Indonesia yang berfungsi sebagai lembaga pembiayaan dengan resiko tinggi, dalam bentuk partisipasi dan dalam jangka waktu tertentu, serta penyelesaian akibat ingkar janji (wanprestasi) yang dilakukan oleh pihak yang dibiayai atau perusahan pasangan usaha (PPU) terhadap pihak yang membiayai atau perusahaan modal ventura (PMV). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Hasilnya menyimpulkan bahwa lembaga pembiayaan modal ventura berperan untuk memperluas alternatif sumber pembiayaan bagi dunia usaha dan pemerataaan kegiatan usaha dalam meningkatka perekonomian di Indonesa serta membantu mempercepat pertumbuhan dan perkembangan dunia usaha dalam pemerataan kegiatan perekonomian nasional dengan tujuan meningkatkan pembiayaan untuk kesejahteraan rakyat. Kemudian, pendanaan modal ventura harus dioptimalkan dalam menggalang dana untuk kemajuan bagi perekonomian rakyat di Indonesia. Adapun kedudukan jaminan dalam pembiayaan modal ventura sebagai pengaman atas resiko yang tinggi, apabila PPU tidak melaksanakan kewajibannya dalam perjanjian selain melunasi utangnya maka objek jaminan akan dieksekusi sebagai pelunasan utangnya. Akibatnya, jika dalam proses pengembangan usaha terjadi wanprestasi maka PPU harus bertanggung jawab atas wanprestasi dengan dikenakan denda atas sanksi atas segala kerugian yang dialami.
Legal Protection of Indonesia’s Fisheries from Foreign Investment: A Social-State Approach Ida Hanifah; Hariyanto Hariyanto; Lilawati Ginting; Ismail Koto; Rizka Syafriana
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v14i1.1964

Abstract

The fisheries sector is at the criticality of Indonesia’s maritime sovereignty, economic resilience and coastal communities’ livelihood security. Simultaneously, the increase in foreign investments on marine and fisheries activities has aroused big apprehensions over resource depletion, inequality in profit sharing as well as diminishing power of small-scale fishers. This is further complicated by Indonesia’s overlapping legal regimes, particularly the Fisheries Law and the Investment Law, as well as international ones such as UNCLOS. This study focuses on the legal protection in Indonesia regarding the fisheries sector affected by foreign investment, to see from normative and scientific perspectives. It also aims to offer directions for how regulatory reform can be shaped through a social-state perspective. The study with semi-structure qualitative descriptive method use Systematic Literature Review (SLR) followed by bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer and PRISMA mapping. Initially, 128 articles published from 2021 to 2025 underwent a screening process by following the Global PRISMA model as per meta-analysis standards; finally, 20 articles met the final inclusion criteria. Results indicate that ongoing discourses are still mostly governed by technocratic and punitive law-making processes. Thus, little attention is paid to the legal re-establishment in accordance with principles of distributive justice, ecological sustainability and effective involvement of the community. Regulatory gaps arise from unclear legal protection for small-scale fishers, and poor integration of the fisheries policy within the broader across marine governance framework. These gaps have resulted in fragmented protection and unequal benefit sharing from fish resources of Indonesia. This research advocates for a state–based regulatory model which empowers the state to act more strongly as both protector and distributor of maritime goods. This framework should be centered on issues of ecological justice, rigorous control over foreign investment, and an increased role for coastal communities in governance of fisheries. The research effort aids the creation of equitable, participatory, and sustainable legal policies for marine and fisheries in Indonesia.
PANDOWO LIMO PEOPLE'S CLAIM TO LAND RIGHTS (A STUDY ON PT. PERKEBUNAN NUSANTARA IV KEBUNAN BALIMBINGAN) Ahmad Bayu Sulistyo; Lilawati Ginting
Inspiring Law Journal Vol 4, No 2 (2026): Juli-Desember
Publisher : Inspiring Law Journal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Right to Use Business (HGU) often causes conflicts between rights holders who obtain formal legality from the state and communities who claim land based on historical control or customary rights. Such as the dispute between PT Perkebunan Nusantara IV Kebun Balimbingan and the Pandowo Limo Community in Simalungun Regency. The issues raised by the legal status of the HGU land owned by PTPN IV based on land law in Indonesia, the legal basis used by the Pandowo Limo community in claiming HGU land as their property, and the mechanism for resolving land disputes in the conflict between PTPN IV Kebun Balimbingan and the Pandowo Limo communityThe research method used is empirical legal research, which is research that examines the implementation and implementation of normative legal provisions in action in legal events that occur in society. This research is descriptive with a legislative approach to obtain a comprehensive normative and empirical understanding.The results of the study show that the legal position of the Right to Use Business (HGU) owned by PT Perkebunan Nusantara IV Kebun Balimbingan is valid and has legal force based on the Basic Agrarian Law and is evidenced by the valid HGU certificate. The claims of the Pandowo Limo people are based on hereditary control and historical legitimacy, but in the trial process they are not supported by written evidence that is strong enough according to positive law. Dispute resolution is carried out through litigation until Decision Number 19/Pdt.G/2023/PN. Sim and appeal decision Number 602/Pdt./2023/PT. MDN affirms the legal standing of PTPN IV as a legitimate right holder. This study also found that there is an inequality between administrative legality and social legitimacy, which is influenced by historical factors, weaknesses in land administration, and limited access to community law, thus reflecting the complexity of agrarian conflicts in Indonesia.
LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE PHRASE "INDEPENDENT" RELATED TO CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF CURATORS IN LAW NUMBER 37 OF 2004 CONCERNING BANKRUPTCY AND SUSPENSION OF DEBT PAYMENT OBLIGATIONS (PKPU) Afwan Mukhairi; Lilawati Ginting
Inspiring Law Journal Vol 3, No 2 (2025): Juli-Desember
Publisher : Inspiring Law Journal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research is motivated by the position of the Curator who has the authority in the management and settlement of bankrupt assets, thus demanding independence as a fundamental principle to guarantee justice and protection of the interests of creditors and debtors. Article 15 paragraph (3) of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and PKPU requires the Curator to be independent, honest, and impartial, but does not provide a clear definition or indicator regarding the phrase "independent". The ambiguity of this norm gives rise to different interpretations in practice and has implications for legal uncertainty and the potential for criminal liability of the Curator. Based on this, this research formulates problems regarding the regulation of the phrase "independent", the form of criminal liability of the Curator, and its implications for legal certainty.            This research uses a normative legal research method with a statutory and conceptual approach. The legal materials used include primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, which are analyzed qualitatively to obtain a systematic and comprehensive legal understanding.and relevant to the research problem.            The results of this study indicate that, first, the regulation of the phrase "independent" in Article 15 paragraph (3) of Law Number 37 of 2004 is a vague norm (vague norm) because it does not have a normative definition or objective indicators, so that its interpretation in practice becomes very objective. Second, the form of criminal liability of curators who are proven not to be independent is subject to general criminal law in Law Number 1 of 2023, which includes the offenses of embezzlement (Article 486), fraud (Article 492), and document falsification (Article 491), as long as the elements of actus reus and mens rea are proven. Third, the ambiguity of the phrase gives rise to legal implications in the form of significant legal uncertainty,For bankrupt debtors, this has the effect of hindering the process of settling bankrupt assets and delaying certainty about the legal status of assets, which prolongs the debtor's legal and economic burden. Furthermore, this situation raises the risk of excessive criminalization for curators and makes it difficult for commercial judges to provide objective assessments, ultimately undermining the credibility of the commercial justice system in Indonesia.
Principle of legal certainty of power of attorney imposing mortgage rights as credit guarantee for micro, small and medium enterprises Lilawati Ginting
Indonesian Journal Education Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Indonesian Journal Education (IJE)
Publisher : Lembaga Riset Mutiara Akbar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56495/ije.v5i1.1481

Abstract

A Power of Attorney to Impose a Mortgage (Surat Kuasa Membebankan Hak Tanggungan / SKMHT) is a legal instrument commonly used in banking practices as collateral for Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) credit, particularly when the establishment of a Mortgage Right (Hak Tanggungan) cannot be carried out immediately. The use of SKMHT is intended to accelerate credit disbursement and provide administrative convenience for MSMEs. However, since SKMHT merely grants authority and does not constitute a material security right, legal issues arise concerning the application of the principle of legal certainty for creditors. This study aims to analyze the implementation of the principle of legal certainty in the use of SKMHT as collateral for MSME credit. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that the use of SKMHT in MSME credit arrangements does not fully fulfill the principle of legal certainty, as it fails to provide strong legal protection for creditors prior to its conversion into a Deed of Granting Mortgage Rights (Akta Pemberian Hak Tanggungan / APHT).
Juridical Review of the Strength of Electronic Evidence To Proof Online Lending Agreement Montayana Meher; Lilawati Ginting
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i1.3483

Abstract

Online lending is a financial service provider for the community, with the granting of this online financial service license, it is hoped that the community, whose economy has been affected and has experienced setbacks during the Covid-19 pandemic, can be helped again to carry out their business activities. When viewed from the practical side, online loans are very helpful and make it easy for people to borrow money. Unlike banks or pawnshops that require a lot of administrative requirements and also collateral or collateral. The research in writing this scientific work is normative juridical research. Normative juridical research is research that examines the application of legal rules and norms related to the topic discussed. The nature of this research is descriptive, namely research that analyzes a legal regulation. All electronic documents in online lending and borrowing agreements that are affixed with valid electronic signatures and also carried out in accordance with the standard provisions stipulated in the Civil Code, ITE Law, and Financial Services Authority Regulations, are valid and strong as electronic evidence and have the same position as letter evidence. Therefore, every online lending and borrowing agreement in which the customer defaults, can file a lawsuit for default to the district court with initial evidence in the form of electronic documents.
JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF BORDER AREA LAND REGISTRATION AND CONSOLIDATION FROM AN ECOSYSTEM PERSPECTIVE THE ERA OF FIVE POINT ZERO DESTRUCTION Lilawati Ginting; Triono Eddy
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i2.4665

Abstract

Land Registration and Consolidation is a policy in the agrarian and land sector which in a constitutionalist approach is an obligation of the Government in all dimensions of Government management and administration, public services, and all aspects and dimensions of the National life system. Therefore, the author is determined to present the central theme in this journal, namely with the title "Judicial Analysis of Border Area Land Registration and Consolidation in the Ecosystem Perspective of the Five Point Zero Disruption Era".  This type of journal writing focuses on the type of normative legal writing. The data used to analyze the problem in question relies on secondary data. The approach methodology is carried out using legal research, through library research, prioritizing qualitative analysis. The theory used to analyze the problem formulation framework in question is by applying Volkgeist theory as a grand theory, namely, the theory of the national soul based on the theory of Friedrich Carl Von Savigny. As a middle theory, it uses the legal theory of Talcott Parsons, famous for his structural functionalism theory, while the applied theory uses the theory of the law of happiness (utilitarianism) by Jeremy Bentham (applied theory). Referring to the analytical content in this journal, the results are specifically related to land registration and consolidation in border areas in the ecosystem perspective of the five-point zero disruption era, according to the mandate of constitutionalism which must be implemented by the Government in a sustainable manner (sustainability). The main aim is to strengthen the understanding of the sovereignty of the State and nation, understand the sovereignty of the people, understand Indonesia as a rule-of-law state, and at the same time strengthen the understanding of the national economy and social welfare.
Implementasi Asas Pemisahan Horizontal dalam Memberi Kepastian Hukum Bangunan Gedung sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia Lilawati Ginting; Montayana Meher
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.4961

Abstract

Asas pemisahan horizontal adalah asas yang memisahkan hak atas tanah dan hak atas atas bangunan gedung baik yang berada di atas maupun di bawah permukaan tanah. Di Indonesia, implementasi asas pemisahan horizontal diwujudkan dengan diterbitkannya surat bukti kepemilikan bangunan gedung (SBKBG) oleh pemerintah berfungsi sebagai bukti kepemilikan dan memfasilitasi penggunaan bangunan gedung sebagai jaminan melalui perjanjian fidusia, sesuai peraturan perundang-undangan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implementasi pemisahan horizontal untuk memberikan kepastian hukum terhadap bangunan yang dijadikan objek jaminan fidusia. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normative. Adapun hasil penelitian yang diperoleh adalah bahwa pelaksanaan pengikatan bangunan gedung sebagai objek jaminan harus selalu dilengkapi dengan persetujuan tertulis dari pemilik tanah, agar tidak terjadi hambatan pada saat eksekusi objek jaminan fidusia.
Co-Authors Afwan Mukhairi Ahmad Bayu Sulistyo Aksa, Febi Sabrina Asliani Diana Mora Jambak Eka Situmorang HARIYANTO HARIYANTO Ida Hanifah Ida Hanifah Ismail Koto Jannati, Shafiya Zilfa Listy Fadilla Utami Lubis, Syofiaty Mirsa Astuti Montayana Meher Mulya Ardiansyah Rambe Mulya Ardiansyah Rambe Mutiara, Tasya Delvita Nabilla Zaskia Putri Onny Medaline Rizka Syafriana Stepya, Chorry Triono Eddy Ummi Adhillah Nasution