Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.44
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal eScience Humanity Journal Jurnal Puan Indonesia Indonesian Research Journal on Education
Prakasa, Ragil Surya
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Chemistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
Penerapan Mediasi Penal Sebagai Penyelesaian Perkara Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga (Perspektif Restorative Justice) Sonia, Citra; Prakasa, Ragil Surya
eScience Humanity Journal Vol 4 No 2 (2024): eScience Humanity Journal Volume 4 Number 2 May 2024
Publisher : Asosiasi Ide Bahasa Kepri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37296/esci.v4i2.94

Abstract

Domestic Violence (KDRT) is still a problem that must be addressed by the Indonesian government, recorded according to the National Commission on Women in 2022 an increase of 18,261 cases, even though law enforcement officials have implemented the Republic of Indonesia Police Regulation Number 8 of 2021 concerning Handling Crimes Based on Restorative Justice. And the institution of the Prosecutor's Office, through the Regulation of the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia Number 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Restorative Justice Prosecution. So it is necessary to analyze the urgency of restorative justice through penal mediation as a settlement of domestic violence cases in the perspective of restorative justice. This research uses a normative juridical method with a statutory approach. The results of the research are the procedures for implementing restorative justice through penal mediation in domestic violence cases carried out with the stages of the police report or complaint process by victims of domestic violence, finding post mortem evidence if physical violence has occurred, a statement of peace, a mutual agreement, and evidence of victim recovery. Meanwhile, in the scope of the prosecutor's office, the stages of the process of peaceful efforts, mutual agreement, fulfillment of justice, and issuance of a letter of termination of prosecution are carried out, and if the agreement is not fulfilled, the court process continues, and penal mediation is very important in domestic violence cases, because Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence does not provide special rules for restorative justice, so that the rights of children affected by domestic violence cannot be fulfilled. Therefore, it is important to implement Police and Prosecutor's Office Regulations on handling criminal offenses based on restorative justice to create a win-win solution and fulfill justice for the dignity of each party involved.
Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Korporasi Terhadap Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Prakasa, Ragil surya; Husein, Husein; Delvia, Delvia; Salsabila, Qhas Karina; Alif, Rahmat Syauqi
eScience Humanity Journal Vol 4 No 2 (2024): eScience Humanity Journal Volume 4 Number 2 May 2024
Publisher : Asosiasi Ide Bahasa Kepri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37296/esci.v4i2.150

Abstract

The development of science and technology and the current unstoppable stream of globalization not only has a positive but also often has a negative impact,for example by the existence of “Crime globalization” and the development of quality (modus operandi) and quantity of criminal acts by corporation.The Problem in this article is How the accountability of corporate criminal law is in theeffort to tackle corruption in the future.The research method used in this article is normative juridical.The result of the study concluded that in the corporate criminal liability policy in the effort to tackle corporate crime in the effort to tackle corruption at the moment there are several weaknesses regarding when corporations commit criminal acts of corruption and criminal sanctions.Therefore for the future criminal responsibility policy of the corporation the explain the provisions and law enforcers can implement it.
Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Korporasi Terhadap Tindak Pidana Usaha Penyediaan Listrik Tanpa Izin Prakasa, Ragil Surya; Azzahra, Dinda; Mutia, Putri; Fauzi, Gamawan; Olivia, Putri Yaldi; Putra, Rizki Eka
eScience Humanity Journal Vol 4 No 2 (2024): eScience Humanity Journal Volume 4 Number 2 May 2024
Publisher : Asosiasi Ide Bahasa Kepri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37296/esci.v4i2.152

Abstract

The Republic of Indonesia is a country that is actively developing in various sectors. Several forms and developments in various sectors can be seen now, such as the economic, technological and social sectors and so on. All business entities, both legal entities and non-legal entities, are called corporations. Corporations are subjects of criminal acts. Meanwhile, to be held criminally accountable, a physical form is required. Crimes committed by corporations are very detrimental to society and the state. This study uses a normative legal research type. The data obtained in this study were then analyzed qualitatively, the Descriptive Analysis Method is a research method. Based on the research results, the legal provisions for criminal acts of providing electricity without an operating permit according to Law 30 of 2009 concerning Electricity are regulated in Article 49 paragraph (2) which states that: "Any person who carries out the business of providing electricity without an operating permit as referred to in Article 22 shall be punished with a maximum imprisonment of 5 years and a maximum fine of IDR 4,000,000,000 (four billion rupiah)".
Pertanggung Jawaban Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Prakasa, Ragil Surya; Rahmadayanti, Indah; Yolanda , Jelfidha Sukma; Febrianis , Ririn; Farhan , Muhammad Adila; Amanda , Shakira; Pratama , Okta Adi
PUAN INDONESIA Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Puan Indonesia Vol 5 No 2 Januari 2024
Publisher : ASOSIASI IDEBAHASA KEPRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37296/jpi.v5i2.280

Abstract

The crime of money laundering or what is better known as money laundering is a term that is often heard in various mass media, therefore many understandings have developed regarding the term money laundering. Sutan Remi Sjahdeini emphasized that currently the term money laundering is commonly used to describe efforts carried out by individuals or legal entities to legalize "dirty" money, which is obtained from the proceeds of criminal acts. The term money laundering has been known since 1930 in the United States. The emergence of this term is closely related to laundry companies. This is because at that time the crime of money laundering was carried out by the mafia crime organization through purchasing clothes washing or laundry companies as a place to launder the proceeds of crime, that is where the term money laundering emerged. The legal research method in this research is normative (doctrinal) called legal dogmatics (rechtsdogmatiek). 10 The research activities carried out include inventorying, explaining, interpreting and systematizing and also evaluating the entire positive law (authoritative text) that applies in a particular society or country. by using concepts (understandings), categories, theories, classifications and methods that are formed and developed specifically to carry out all these activities, all of which are directed towards preparing efforts to find a judicial solution to the problem. laws (micro and macro) that may occur in society. In general, the elements of the crime of money laundering are as follows: a. The existence of money (funds) which are illegal or invalid in the eyes of the law. b. There is illicit money (dirty money) which is processed in certain ways through legal (legitimate) institutions so that the perpetrators get large profits. c. With the aim of eliminating traces, so that the source of origin cannot or is very difficult to be identified and traced by legal entities because the profits are not directly spent on goods. The crime of money laundering has been regulated in Law no. 5 of 2010. Types of money laundering are divided into 3 types, namely: The criminal act of money laundering is an act that has quite a big impact on the state, which can be detrimental to the state and the surrounding community. Especially laundering crimes committed by corporations. This of course has a big negative impact, especially in the economic sector. The crime of money laundering in Indonesia is regulated in Law No. 8 of 2010 concerning Prevention and Eradication of the Crime of Money Laundering.
Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Kejahatan Ekonomi Chan, Muhammad Rafly; Prakasa, Ragil Surya; Musa, Muhammad Ibrahim; Pratama, Harits Surya; Al-Qalil, Muhammad Hafisz; Suwanda, Dwi Ari
PUAN INDONESIA Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Puan Indonesia Vol 5 No 2 Januari 2024
Publisher : ASOSIASI IDEBAHASA KEPRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37296/jpi.v5i2.306

Abstract

The development of economic globalization has the potential for crime/crimes in the economic sector to be committed by business actors in the form of corporations which can cause losses and victims, which is supported by the emergence and development of science and information technology. The difficulty of holding corporations criminally liable for money game activities by using gold as an object in online investment, using multi-level marketing networks and online networks, ultimately results in material losses for victims as customers. However, criminal liability in the form of strict liability can provide a solution to this problem, where full corporate criminal liability (strict liability) states that criminal liability can be sought against the corporation. This research is normative juridical legal research using a conceptual approach, statutory approach and case approach. Collecting material through literature study methods, with primary or secondary laws. Legal material is further examined and analyzed using the approach used in this research to answer the legal problems in this research. The results of this research show: corporate crime is organized crime which not only involves the corporation itself but also involves organs or administrators in the company. Under this regulation, you unknowingly violate the principle of nebis in idem. So in terms of criminal liability against unincorporated companies the law often decides not only against the company but also against its administrators.
Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Pertanggungjawaban Tindak Pidana Korporasi di Indonesia Prakasa, Ragil Surya; Fajrin, Nurul Izzah; Vebrianti, Nisa; Maulana, Rozi Ikram; Sari, Fanni Kurnia; Ferisya, Sabrina; Adriansyah, Rico
Indonesian Research Journal on Education Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): irje 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/irje.v4i3.829

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kebijakan hukum pidana dalam pertanggungjawaban tindak pidana korporasi di Indonesia, dan untuk menganalisis penerapan sanksi pidana terhadap korporasi yang melakukan tindak pidana korporasi dalam hukum positif di Indonesia. Penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif, dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundangan-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Sedangkan untuk metode analisis data yang digunakan adalah metode deskriptif, metode evaluatif, dan metode argumentatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini menerangkan bahwa kebijakan hukum pidana dalam pertanggungjawaban pidana oleh korporasi di Indonesia lahir dari adanya perbuatan melawan hukum a criminal act (actus reus) dan terpenuhinya unsure kesalahan a criminal intent (mens rea) sehingga dari segi objektif terhadap perbuatan yang dinyatakan sebagai tindak pidana yang berlaku dan secara subjektif kepada korporasi sebagai pelaku tindak pidana yang memenuhi persyaratan untuk dapat dikenai pidana karena perbuatannya. Serta penerapan sanksi pidana terhadap korporasi yang melakukan tindak pidana korupsi dalam hukum positif di Indonesia di atur dalam ketentuan Pasal 2 dan Pasal 20 UU No. 31 tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, yang memberikan pemahaman bahwa pertanggungjawaban pengganti dapat diterapkan jika masih dalam kewenangan pimpinan korporasi serta mengatur penerapan pidana pokok hanya dapat diganti dengan pidana denda serta pidana tambahan 1/3.
Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Prakasa, Ragil Surya; Salsabila, Nabila; Viona, Wahyu Okta; Sherin, Sherin; Rober, Keny; Putera, Alvin Adrian
Indonesian Research Journal on Education Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): irje 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/irje.v4i2.830

Abstract

Sistem hukum pidana yang dianut oleh KUHP Indonesia adalah sistem hukum Eropa Kontinental, yang tidak mengenal korporasi sebagai subjek hukum. Namun dalam korporasi sebagai subjek hukum. Di Indonesia hal ini di awali dengan lahirnya UU No.7/Drt/1995 tentang Tindak Pidana Ekonomi yang kemudian disusul oleh peraturan pidana khusus lainnya seperti Undang-Undang Pemberatasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (UU No.31 Tahun 1999 Jo UU No. 20 Tahun 2001).Dalam formulasi aturan pemidanaan (pertanggungjawaban pidana) korporasi dalam tindak pidana korupsi terdapat kelemahan-kelemahan sebagai berikut “dalam merumuskan kapan korporasi melakukan tindak pidana korupsi tidak dijelaskna pengertian “hubungankerja” dan “hubungan lain”, tidak diatur pemberatan pidana untuk korporasi yang melakukan tindak pidana sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 2 ayat (2); tidak diatur pidana pengganti denda yang tidak dibayar oleh korporasi. Selain itu juga terdapat kelemahan umum dari UUPTPK yang berpengaruh terhadap pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi yaitu: tidak diaturnya korupsi (residive) menurut UUPTPK. Melihat kelemahan-kelemahan tersebut diatas, maka saran yang diberikan adalah UUPTPK perlu diamandemen.
Co-Authors Adriansyah, Rico Al-Qalil, Muhammad Hafisz Alif, Rahmat Syauqi Amanda , Shakira Amelia Oktaviani, Amelia Azzahra, Dinda Chan, Muhammad Rafly Delvia, Delvia Fachriah, Raysah Afdila Fajrin, Nurul Izzah Farhan , Muhammad Adila Fauzi, Gamawan Febrianis , Ririn Ferisya, Sabrina Irzal, Ryanel Iskandar , Muhammad Mariska, Dinda Maulana, Rozi Ikram Muhammad Husein Maruapey Musa, Muhammad Ibrahim Mutia, Putri Nasli, Muhammad Ibnu Zaki Naturrachma, Khaza Olivia, Putri Yaldi Pratama , Okta Adi Pratama, Harits Surya Putera, Alvin Adrian Rahmadayanti, Indah Ramadhini, Nurul Rizki Eka Putra, Rizki Eka Rober, Keny Salsabila, Nabila Salsabila, Qhas Karina Sari, Adila Permata Sari, Fanni Kurnia Sherin, Sherin Sonia, Citra Suwanda, Dwi Ari Tanjung, Syiffa Amalia Putri Triana, Sindy Vebrianti, Nisa Viona, Wahyu Okta Waldi, Dinda Desna Yolanda , Jelfidha Sukma