Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Majalah Kesehatan FKUB Jurnal Ilmu Kedokteran dan Kesehatan Jurnal Medika Malahayati AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis Jurnal Hukum dan Etika Kesehatan (JHEK) Research Horizon Cermin Dunia Kedokteran
Johan, Willy
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Restorative Justice in Medical Disputes: Analyzing Responsiveness and Legal Neutrality Deficit from the Perspective of Healthcare Professionals Johan, Willy; Fikri , Ahmad Ma’mun
Research Horizon Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): Research Horizon - December 2025
Publisher : LifeSciFi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54518/rh.5.6.2025.865

Abstract

The application of restorative justice in medical disputes in Indonesia faces significant structural obstacles. This study examines how healthcare professionals experience and perceive restorative justice, analyzes its vulnerabilities through the frameworks of responsive law and critical legal studies, and proposes a neutral, proportional model of dispute resolution, particularly through specialized medical adjudication, to address regulatory gaps that enable extortion risks and legal injustice. Using a phenomenological empirical-qualitative approach combined with statutory and critical legal analysis, the research evaluates the practical implementation of the Health Law (Law Number 17 of 2023). The findings show that restorative justice helps reduce adversarial litigation and protects the professional reputation of healthcare providers, who overwhelmingly prefer mediation to court proceedings. However, the lack of clear procedural limits and standardized restitution guidelines leaves practitioners vulnerable to misuse and disproportionate claims, causing the mechanism, intended to promote responsiveness, to drift toward repressive outcomes. This shift intensifies socio-economic inequalities and media-driven pressures, undermining legal neutrality and substantive justice. The study recommends the establishment of precise regulatory standards, independent oversight, and specialized medical adjudication mechanisms to ensure that restorative justice operates fairly, effectively, and in accordance with objective medical and legal principles.
Co-Authors Agung, Suryanto Eko Alphonsus Arya Arbikara Arman Lany Dian Angger Suaner Fikri , Ahmad Ma’mun Happy Yulia Ida Ayu Nitri Saraswati Irsan, Istan Irmansyah Karunia Meilani Nurfatika Muhamad Reza Muhammad Arief Kusuma Mulyani, Kahar Nanik Setijowati Nugroho, Hari Adityo Poppy Putri Pratiwi Prasetyadjati, Ari Prastiyo, Ragil Barry Prayuti, Yuyut Rian Andriani, Rian Sagita, Praniko Imam Sehafudin, Sultan Sholikah, Dwi Imroatus Taufiq Abdullah, Taufiq Veranita, Mira Yusmana, Fane Virginia Zaiyanah, Munsifah