Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.463
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JRPP) Ghancaran: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia ENTITA: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial dan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Nusantara Science and Technology Proceedings
Sa’diyah, Ilmatus
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Medicine & Pharmacology Social Sciences Other

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Nusantara Science and Technology Proceedings

 1 
Using Google Scholar and Mendeley (GSM) to Improve The Ability to Write Scientific Articles from The Results of Teachers Classroom Action Research at SMPN 2 Balongbendo Sidoarjo Sa’diyah, Ilmatus; Hamid, Abdul; Saidan, Gading Adian Kun; Zahirah, Jafni Fara; Ramadhani, Nabila Eka
Nusantara Science and Technology Proceedings 8th International Seminar of Research Month 2023
Publisher : Future Science

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.11594/nstp.2024.4126

Abstract

Classroom Action Research is research conducted through action in the classroom by teachers where the target or research subjects are students. Its application is to carry out and make reports on research results that can be written in the form of scientific articles, especially in the field of education. Classroom Action Research is a strategic way for teachers to increase professionalism in teaching and learning activities. In fact, there are teachers who don't know about the technicalities of implementing Classroom Action Research and writing scientific articles. This is also experienced by the teachers at SMPN 2 Balongbendo. Therefore, we do community service at SMPN 2 Balongbendo by applying Google Scholar and Mendeley (GSM) technology to improve the ability to write scientific articles from the results of classroom action research for teachers. In this community service activity, teachers are accompanied in using GSM technology to write scientific articles and publish them. Teachers are also given evaluations in the form of quizzes regarding the material that has been delivered by the service team. In addition, questionnaires were also distributed in the form of Google forms and the results showed that the teachers were very enthusiastic in participating in community service activities. Based on the results of the questionnaire, it was shown that 66.7% answered appropriate and 33.3% answered very appropriate regarding the suitability of the Mendeley and Google Scholar applications in improving the ability to write scientific articles for teachers.
Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Artpop Project Based Learning Method with the Literacy Room Learning Method Sa’diyah, Ilmatus; Savitri, Adelia; Ahmadi, Anas; Retnosari, Galuh Fitri; Merdana, Suvriati Vivka; Varqa A., Nine Alvariqati
Nusantara Science and Technology Proceedings 8th International Seminar of Research Month 2023
Publisher : Future Science

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.11594/nstp.2024.4128

Abstract

The project-based learning method is a learning method that is considered to provide more learning experiences than other learning methods, such as discussions and lectures in class. In addition, project-based methods can also provide effective learning outcomes. In learning to write articles, both scientific articles and popular articles, a project-based learning method is needed that can improve students' writing skills. For this reason, in writing scientific articles the "literacy space" method is used, while in writing popular articles the artpop method is used. This research was conducted to compare the effectiveness of the two methods. The research methods used are qualitative and quantitative research. Data collection techniques used were documentation, questionnaires, and student scores. Meanwhile, the data were analyzed descriptively qualitatively, and quantitatively. From the comparative studies that have been carried out, the two methods have significant differences and similarities. However, in terms of effectiveness in learning, the Artpop learning method is considered more effective. The difference in the effectiveness of the two is 2.8%. The artpop learning method is more effective because the learning activities carried out are simple. Students only need to change scientific articles that have been published on Google Scholar into popular articles that can be read by the public in simple language. When writing scientific articles, activities are needed that can increase students' understanding in terms of writing titles, introductions, literature reviews, research methods, results and discussions, citations and bibliography. Meanwhile, in writing popular articles, activities are needed to support students' understanding in terms of writing titles, introductions, contents, and closings. The learning methods used appropriately accommodate the needs of these students.
Co-Authors A, Aisyah Nurdianingsih P. Abdul Hamid Adelia Savitri, Adelia Agik Nur Efendi Anas Ahmadi Ariefean, Mohammad Rafka Mahendra Arta, Safira Athallah, Ikbar Aviolla Terza, Aviolla Terza Endang Sholihatin Erika Kurniawati, Erika Fitri Wulandari Hidayat, Athallah Bariq Husna, Hawa Asma Ul INDARTI, TITIK Irawan, Putri Nur Fadilah Lima, Cagiva Chaedar Bey Merdana, Suvriati Vivka Octaviani, Marshanda Amelya Putri, Adinda Rusdianti Maulani Ramadhani, Nabila Eka Retnosari, Galuh Fitri Rokhmawati, Zahro Safitri, Eristya Maya Saidan, Gading Adian Kun Sandy, Rizki Romadhoni Sanubarianto, Salimulloh T Siaturi, Eliezer M. Putra Sya’adah, Himatus Varqa A., Nine Alvariqati Zahirah, Jafni Fara