Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.909
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jaqfi : Jurnal Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam JURNAL YAQZHAN: Analisis Filsafat, Agama dan Kemanusiaan Al-Hikmah: Jurnal Agama dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education Mukaddimah: Jurnal Studi Islam Al Hikmah : Jurnal Studi Keislaman Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (Japendi) Kartika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Setyaki : Jurnal Studi Keagamaan Islam Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Karakter
Khudori Soleh, Achmad
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Astronomy Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Environmental Science Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Neuroscience Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Klasifikasi Ilmu Menurut al-Farabi dan Relevansinya terhadap Perkembangan Keilmuan Kontemporer Fathurrahman. Mh, A.; Khudori Soleh, Achmad; Asy-Syarifah, Chodijah; Tanjung, Wahyuditira
Kartika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Kartika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman (November)
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan Tinggi Nahdlatul Ulama (LPT NU) PCNU Kabupaten Nganjuk

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59240/kjsk.v5i3.158

Abstract

The classification of knowledge formulated by al-Farabi remains highly relevant to the development of contemporary sciences, particularly in integrating rational and revealed knowledge. This study aims to analyze the relevance of al-Farabi’s classification of sciences to modern scientific paradigms. The research employs a qualitative method with a library research approach and philosophical analysis, focusing on al-Farabi’s works and contemporary interpretations of his thought. The findings indicate that al-Farabi divides knowledge into two major categories: theoretical sciences, which emphasize the development of fundamental concepts and principles, and practical sciences, which focus on the application of knowledge in social and ethical contexts. This classification aligns with the modern structure of scientific disciplines encompassing the natural sciences, humanities, and social sciences. The study concludes that al-Farabi’s epistemological framework is not merely historical but provides a foundational and integrative model for the development of contemporary science that harmonizes rational, ethical, and spiritual dimensions.
A Comparative Analysis of Rationalism Paradigms: An Islamic and Western Perspective Hasanah Harahap, Nurizka; Khudori Soleh, Achmad
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Vol. 6 No. 12 (2025): Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains
Publisher : CV. Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jiss.v6i12.2121

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the concept of rationalism from both Islamic and Western perspectives through a comparative approach. Previous research indicates that the two traditions share the use of reason as an epistemic instrument, yet differ significantly in their sources of truth, methodological foundations, and philosophical orientations. This research employs a library-based method with a philosophical-descriptive approach to examine the ideas of key thinkers from both traditions. The findings reveal that Western rationalism grounds truth in the autonomy of human reason through deductive methods, methodological skepticism, and the coherence theory of truth. In contrast, Islamic rationalism integrates reason with divine revelation, particularly in interpreting theological and metaphysical realities. These distinctions influence the development of scientific thought, the structure of epistemology, and ethical orientations within each civilization. This study concludes that Islamic rationalism is characterized by a theocentric-integrative framework, whereas Western rationalism tends to be anthropocentric and secular. The results of this research are expected to contribute to the discourse on comparative epistemology and provide a foundation for further studies on the integration of knowledge.
Co-Authors Abdillah, Muhammad Hanif Ali Murfi Arzaqi, Anindhya Faza Asy'arie, Bima Fandi Asy-Syarifah, Chodijah Bunayar Chabibi, Chamim El Yasmin, Yusroh Fathurrahman. Mh, A. Hasanah Harahap, Nurizka Muhammad Fahim Tharaba Munirul Abidin Poppy Rachman Qurrotul’ain, Diah Rahmawati, Rizkia Amalia Rodiallah, Alkaf Syarifudin, Imam Tanjung, Wahyuditira Wahyu Wardah