Husnia Hilmi Wahyuni
Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus 1945, Semarang

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : UNTAG Law Review

ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN PUBLIC SERVICES POPULATION ADMINISTRATION FOR SAMIN BELIEFS IN PATI Afda’u, Faisal; Wahyuni, Husnia Hilmi; Gravionika, Elsa
UNTAG Law Review Vol 8, No 1 (2024): UNTAG LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/ulrev.v8i1.4982

Abstract

Believers are a group of people who experience discrimination in the administrative system in relation to the religion column in the e-KTP. In general, when viewed from the population administration, the location of adherents of beliefs, adherents of ancestral religions and the implementation of rituals in adat makes it difficult for them during state administration in personal documents such as electronic identity cards (KTP), family cards (KK), marriage certificates. , and birth certificates. Based on the article of the Population Administration Lawwhich explains that religion in the religion column on the family card (KK) and electronic identity card (KTP) for adherents of faith is not filled in fundamentally, this is because the sect has not been recognized as well as other religions. another, so that in the electronic identity card (KTP) there is no record that someone is a believer. Meanwhile, the Population Administration Law is factually or at least potentially detrimental to constitutional rights. This is where discrimination arises against people who do not yet have an awareness of human rights. Cases of discrimination against adherents of certain religions are even carried out by bureaucracy, although the 1945 Constitution has stated to free people to practice their respective religions and beliefs.
A Legal Study of the Implementation of the Collective Music Royalty Management System in Indonesia Widyorini, Sri Retno; Wahyuni, Husnia Hilmi; Supeno, Bambang Joyo
UNTAG Law Review Vol 9, No 2 (2025): UNTAG Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/ulrev.v9i2.6721

Abstract

The collective management system regulated by Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright, Government Regulation Number 56 of 2021, and various ministerial regulations is designed to protect the economic rights of creators, related rights owners, and users of musical works through a royalty collection and distribution mechanism. However, its implementation has given rise to various normative issues, ranging from overlapping authority between LMK and LMKN, unclear licensing mechanisms, and minimal transparency in royalty distribution. This culminated in a number of creators filing judicial review lawsuits against PP 56/2021 and Permenkumham 27/2025, objecting to the system's inconsistency with copyright protection principles. This study aims to legally examine the implementation of the collective music royalty management system in Indonesia and assess its compliance with the principles of justice, legal certainty, and transparency. This study uses a normative legal approach supported by philosophical and conceptual analysis. The results of this study found that the implementation of the collective royalty management system still faces various ineffectiveness, including potential conflicts of interest, administrative burdens, and a lack of institutional accountability. This situation indicates the need for regulatory reformulation and strengthening of institutional governance so that the royalty management system can operate fairly, transparently, and sustainably to support the national music industry ecosystem.