Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.557
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DE JURE Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Jambe Law Journal Unes Law Review Jambura Law Review ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan Khazanah Hukum LEGAL BRIEF Journal of Judicial Review Journal of Muslim Community Health (JMCH) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies)
Maarif, Ihsanul
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 18 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : LEGAL BRIEF

 1 
Analysis of Regulatory Reform Dynamics: A Comparative Study on the Ef-ficacy of the Omnibus Law Method and Legal Codification in National Regulatory Structure. Maarif, Ihsanul
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 13 No. 4 (2024): October: Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/legal.v13i4.1089

Abstract

The regulation of national laws in Indonesia faces significant challenges due to overlapping rules and regulatory inflation, which hinder legal certainty and economic efficiency. To address this issue, the government has adopted two primary approaches to regulatory reform: the Omnibus Law and Legal Codification. This study aims to analyze and compare the effectiveness of both approaches in Indonesian regulatory reform. The research employs a normative legal method with comparative analysis, utilizing data gathered from legal statutes, academic journals, and official documents. The findings indicate that the Omnibus Law is effective in addressing the need for rapid reform in dynamic sectors such as investment and labor, yet it poses risks of regulatory inconsistency, potentially leading to legal uncertainty. On the other hand, legal coding offers greater stability and consistency, though its implementation is slower and less adaptable to sectors requiring swift changes. This study's implications suggest that a selective approach is necessary, strategically applying the Omnibus Law to certain sectors while maintaining Legal Codification as the foundation for a more harmonious and sustainable legal system. This research provides recommendations for policymakers to enhance regulatory harmonization and consider the technical capacity of legal authorities in implementing reforms
Co-Authors Abdullah, Mohd Kamarulnizam Bahri, Robi Asadul Bahri, Robi Assadul Bunyamin Bunyamin Farma, Mella Ismelina Firdaus Arifin, Firdaus Haeruddin Haeruddin I Gde Pantja Astawa Kwarteng, Abdul Hamid Md. Nor, Mohd Zakhiri Mella Ismelina Farma Rahayu Murbani, Anastasia Wahyu Permana, Fikri Chandra Prihartanto, Yudi Subrata, Rusli Sugiarti, Taty Sulastri, Dewi Sumiati Sumiati Suryana, Cece Susanto, Anthon F Yeti Kurniati