Begishev, Ildar
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Restorative Justice for Child Abortion Offenders Mutmainnah, Luluk; Begishev, Ildar
Lex Journal: Kajian Hukum & Keadilan Vol 8 No 1 (2024): July
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Dr. Soetomo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25139/lex.v8i1.8808

Abstract

The application of restorative justice can only be applied in certain cases. For example, cases involving children are explicitly explained in Article 1 point (6) of Law Number 11/2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System. Then, what about the child as the perpetrator of abortion who has eliminated the life of his flesh and blood, whether restorative justice can be applied. This study aims to examine the restorative justice approach in the criminal justice system and the punishment of children who commit abortion based on restorative justice. The method used in this research is normative legal research, with statutory, and conceptual approaches. The results showed that restorative justice approach in the criminal justice system can be applied to certain cases. For example, corruption, narcotics, children and so on. While the punishment of abortion offenders based on restorative justice is not necessarily applicable. This is because not all abortions are performed by rape victims.
Internationalization of Halal Product Assurance Standards in Indonesia in Ensuring Consumer Rights: Implications and Orientation Wibowo, Dwi Edi; Soeharto, Achmad; Taufiq; Kunantiyorini, Anik; Prematura, Aditya Migi; Begishev, Ildar
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Suara Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v6n2.p356-384

Abstract

Halal product assurance is part of consumer rights that ensures consumers receive a legal guarantee for a product that has been certified halal. In Indonesia, there are efforts to internationalize halal product assurance standards through cooperation with other countries. This research aims to analyze the legal implications and orientation related to the internationalization of halal product assurance standards in Indonesia with other countries. This research is a normative legal study that emphasizes conceptual, legislative, and historical approaches. The research results indicate that the internationalization of halal product assurance standards in Indonesia can have positive implications, such as the adoption of Indonesian halal regulations and standards by other countries, increased cooperation with both Muslim-majority and non-Muslim countries, and enhanced competitiveness of Indonesian products in the global halal industry market, particularly from the small, micro, and medium enterprise sector. Future orientation in the internationalization of halal product assurance standards in Indonesia can be achieved through strengthening cooperation with non-Muslim countries in terms of technology transfer, and with Muslim countries to improve the quality of halal certification and strengthen their position in the global halal market. This research offers novelty in the form of international collaboration and legal implications that can have a wide-ranging impact, especially on the competitiveness of Indonesian products in the global halal market. This research recommends a revision of Government Regulation No. 39 of 2021 concerning the Implementation of the Halal Product Assurance Sector to formulate more optimal regulations regarding international cooperation in halal product assurance standards in Indonesia. Keywords: Consumer Rights, Internationalization, Halal Product Assurance, Cooperation.
Unqualified Audit Opinions and Their Role in Promoting Transparent, Accountable, and Just Governance Reform Amiq, Bachrul; Hamdani, Fathul; Prawesthi, Wahyu; Aribawa, Muhammad Yustino; Begishev, Ildar
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v13i2.1713

Abstract

This study examines the effect of the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK) audit results with an unqualified opinion (WTP) on efforts to improve clean governance in Indonesia. The WTP opinion shows that the financial statements of government entities have been prepared by applicable accounting standards and regulations. Using a normative legal research approach, this study examines the relevance of the WTP opinion as the main indicator of transparency, accountability, and integrity in state financial management. The results show that the WTP opinion has a positive impact in increasing transparency and accountability, strengthening supervision and efficiency of financial management, reducing the potential for corruption, and building public trust in the government. In addition, the WTP opinion also encourages bureaucratic reform through technology adoption, strengthening human resources, and more effective budget planning. This research emphasizes the importance of WTP opinion as a strategic tool in realizing good and sustainable governance.
Substantive Justice in Consumer Protection Law: A Comparative Study of Regulations in Indonesia and Russia Wibowo, Dwi Edi; Wibowo, Aurea Qonita; Begishev, Ildar
Batulis Civil Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): VOLUME 6 ISSUE 3, NOVEMBER 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/ballrev.v6i3.3359

Abstract

Introduction: Consumer protection is a crucial aspect in maintaining the balance between business interests and the rights of consumers. Legal regulations must embody the principles of substantive justice, ensuring not only formal legal procedures but also tangible outcomes that directly benefit society. the application of substantive justice theory within consumer protection regulations in Indonesia and Russia, two countries with distinct legal systems and socio-political contexts.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to analyze the extent to which consumer protection regulations in Indonesia and Russia have implemented the principles of substantive justice, and to identify points of convergence as well as divergence between the two systems.Methods of the Research: This research employs a normative legal method with a comparative approach. Data are obtained through statutory analysis, examination of relevant provisions, and a review of scholarly literature on substantive justice. The research emphasizes how the respective legal frameworks address consumer rights, business obligations, and dispute resolution mechanisms.Results Main Findings of the Research: The findings reveal that Indonesia, through Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, primarily emphasizes the distribution of rights, obligations, and accessible dispute resolution mechanisms. Meanwhile, Russia, under the Law on Protection of Consumer Rights Number 2300-1 of 1992, places greater weight on comprehensive compensation, including moral damages. The originality of this research lies in its comparative analysis of the application of substantive justice theory between Indonesia and Russia, a juxtaposition rarely explored in consumer law scholarship. The study contributes to the academic discourse by demonstrating that the realization of substantive justice depends not only on statutory provisions but also on the effectiveness of legal enforcement and public legal awareness.