Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.92
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal PALAR (Pakuan Law review) IBLAM Law Review Madani: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Juris Prima: Jurnal Inovasi Hukum dan Kebijakan
Zacharias, Vasco Javarison
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Education Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Perjudian Dalam Kerangka Hukum Ekonomi Syariah: Tinjauan Terhadap Maysir dan Konsekuensinya Maita, Rafel; Zacharias, Vasco Javarison; Hutasoit, Tomi; M, Mahipal; Haider, Edwardo Cipta; Vahzrianur, Vehrial
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 2, No 2 (2024): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11212490

Abstract

Information and communication technology has experienced very rapid development, so that the world is now borderless. Significant social changes occur rapidly through the use of internet services, which are currently used in various aspects of life, such as business, education, entertainment, social, cultural, including in Islamic practice. From the perspective of Islamic law, maysir is prohibited (haram) because it basically does not provide any benefits and brings many harms or dangers to the perpetrators. On the other hand, sharia economic law is a form of law that regulates interactions between people related to the economy, objects, and relevant legal determinations. Law Number 7 of 1974 is a positive legal product that regulates gambling. Gambling is declared a prohibited act in the Positive Law perspective, because this act not only destroys common sense but also results in other crimes such as theft, murder and fraud. This is caused by the impact of gambling which results in the perpetrator losing a way to earn money legally, thus greatly affecting economic growth in society. Therefore, it is the obligation of the Indonesian government to reduce and overcome the increase in gambling through outreach regarding the impacts and dangers of gambling, which has now spread widely in all levels of society. 
TINJAUAN YURIDIS PENGHUKUMAN TERHADAP PELAKU KORUPSI YANG TERBUKTI BERSALAH DALAM KASUS PENCUCIAN UANG: TINJAUAN TERHADAP IMPLEMENTASI HUKUM PIDANATINJAUAN YURIDIS PENGHUKUMAN TERHADAP PELAKU KORUPSI YANG TERBUKTI BERSALAH DALAM KASUS PENCUCIAN UANG: TINJ Maita, Rafel; Zacharias, Vasco Javarison; Hosnah, Asmak Ul
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v4i2.397

Abstract

Dalam kajian hukum normatif yang juga dikenal sebagai penelitian hukum doktrinal, diungkap bahwa kejaksaan dan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) berwenang menuntut pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (TPPU) berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (UU TPPU), jika tindak pidana yang melatarbelakanginya adalah korupsi. Akan tetapi, Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (UU KPK) tidak memberikan penjelasan mendetail tentang peran KPK dalam penanganan kasus TPPU yang bermula dari tindak pidana korupsi. Kajian ini mengedepankan analisis terhadap hukum positif yang relevan. Hal ini terjadi meskipun kepolisian dan kejaksaan, yang mendapat amanat eksplisit dari undang-undang, secara umum tidak mengalami kesulitan dalam mengatasi kasus-kasus TPPU. Menjadi penting untuk merevisi Pasal 76 agar kewenangan penuntut umum dari Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) dalam menangani kasus Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (TPPU) yang berkaitan dengan korupsi dapat disamakan, sebagaimana diatur dalam UU No. 8 Tahun 2010 tentang TPPU. Hal ini meniscayakan perlunya klarifikasi terhadap interpretasi Ayat (1) Pasal 76, yang menetapkan bahwa penuntut umum dari Kejaksaan Agung RI dan KPK adalah entitas yang bersatu dengan hak yang identik dalam mengelola kasus-kasus tersebut. Dengan demikian, hal ini akan mengakhiri kontroversi yang ada mengenai wewenang KPK dalam menangani kasus TPPU. Oleh karena itu, penuntut umum yang berasal dari KPK dianggap berwenang untuk menuntut dalam kasus TPPU dimana tindak pidana asalnya adalah korupsi.
Analisis Hukum Terhadap Legalitas dan Implikasi Ekspor Pasir Laut Dalam Perspektif Hukum Tata Ruang dan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 26 Tahun 2023 Faturachman, Fauzan Azima; Anjani, Maudy; Zacharias, Vasco Javarison; Maita, Rafel; M, Mahipal
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 3, No 1 (2025): February
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The exploitation of marine sand as a high-value natural resource has sparked debate in Indonesia, particularly after the issuance of Government Regulation Number 26 of 2023, which regulates the export of marine sand. This policy legally permits the export of marine sand under specific conditions, yet concerns arise regarding its impact on coastal ecosystems and spatial planning, potentially disrupting environmental balance and affecting coastal communities. This study aims to assess the legality of this policy from the perspective of spatial and environmental law and to analyze its implications for marine environmental sustainability. Using a normative juridical approach, the research examines relevant regulations and legal principles. Findings indicate that although the marine sand export policy is legally grounded, its implementation poses significant risks of marine ecosystem degradation, coastal erosion, and changes to coastal spatial planning. Therefore, strict monitoring of this policy is essential to mitigate adverse environmental impacts.
Relevansi Positivisme Hukum terhadap Rasionalitas Ilmu Hukum dan Praktik Penegakan Hukum Febrianty, Yenny; Ryendra, Nadya Restu; Zacharias, Vasco Javarison
Juris Prima: Jurnal Inovasi Hukum dan Kebijakan Vol. 1 No. 02 (2025): Juris Prima: Jurnal Inovasi Hukum dan Kebijakan
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Kardin Assidiq

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63868/jihk.v1i02.35

Abstract

This study examines the relevance of legal positivism to the rationality of legal science and its impact on law enforcement practices in Indonesia. The research focuses on two central questions: how positivism is implemented in the development of legal science and how it is applied in law enforcement practice. The study employs a normative juridical method, utilising an approach that analyses legislation, doctrinal writings, legal principles, and theoretical perspectives from prominent legal scholars. This framework enables a systematic analysis of positivism as the dominant paradigm that shapes legal reasoning in both academic inquiry and institutional enforcement mechanisms. The findings suggest that the prevalence of positivism in legal scholarship fosters a reductionist tendency, where legal science primarily evolves as a practical discipline focused on normative texts and legal-dogmatic interpretation techniques. This focus limits the development of a more reflective, critical, and interdisciplinary approach. Although positivism contributes a logical order to legal methodology, the combination of empirical observation and formal logic is insufficient to capture the complexity of the social realities underlying the law. Therefore, the positivist framework requires complementary elements such as intuitive reasoning, holistic perspectives, and sensitivity to social dynamics. In the realm of law enforcement, the dominance of positivism results in a strong emphasis on rules, procedures, and administrative formalities. As a result, law enforcement practices can become disconnected from societal needs and the pursuit of substantive justice. While certainty positivism's primary value provides a transparent and predictable normative structure, the rigid application of this approach risks transforming the law from an instrument of justice into merely a mechanism for procedural compliance. Overall, this study concludes that the application of positivism in legal science and law enforcement presents both advantages and limitations. While positivism offers logical coherence and normative certainty, it must be balanced with reflective, contextual, and humanistic approaches to allow the law to develop comprehensively and achieve social justice.
Juridical Analysis of Decision No. 337/Pid.Sus/2020/PN. Jkt.Sel in the Perspective of Money Laundering and the Criminal Code Hosnah, Asmak Ul; Djakarsih Putro, Sapto Handoyo; Jevis, Weldy; Prihatini, Lilik; Sinaga, Walter Aaron Life; Zacharias, Vasco Javarison; DRD, Moch Ilham
PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Vol 11, No 4 (2025): Volume 11, Number 4 October-Desember 2025
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PAKUAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33751/palar.v11i4.13202

Abstract

 Abstract  The purpose of this legal research is to elaborate and explain fundamentally the judge's legal considerations in Decision Number 337/Pid.Sus/2020/PN. Jkt.Sel related to the application of the provisions of the Money Laundering Crime (TPPU) and its relation to the Criminal Code (KUHP). Based on the verdict, the defendant Ir. Roni Wijaya was proven to have legally committed a tax crime as stipulated in Article 39A letter a of Law Number 28 of 2007 jo. Article 64 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code and the crime of money laundering as stipulated in Article 3 of Law Number 8 of 2010. This type of research is a normative legal research that is descriptive and analytical, with a statutory approach and a case approach, using secondary data through literature studies and qualitative analysis. The results of the study show that the application of the TPPU article in this decision has reflected the double track system of criminality, where the predicate crime in the form of tax violations is the basis for proving TPPU. The merging of the provisions of the Anti-Corruption Law and the Criminal Code shows the application of the principle  of lex specialis derogat legi generali in criminal law. Thus, this decision affirms the consistency of the application of the law to economic crimes that have a systemic impact on state finances. Keywords: Money Laundering Crime, Decision Number: 337/Pid.Sus/2020/PN. Jkt.Sel, Criminal Code. 
Co-Authors Anjani, Maudy Asmak UI Hosnah Djakarsih Putro, Sapto Handoyo DRD, Moch Ilham Faturachman, Fauzan Azima Haider, Edwardo Cipta Hj. Lilik Prihatini Hutasoit, Tomi Jevis, Weldy Mahipal Maita, Rafel Ryendra, Nadya Restu Sinaga, Walter Aaron Life Vahzrianur, Vehrial Yenny Febrianty