Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.857
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS Zero : Jurnal Sains, Matematika, dan Terapan KUBIK: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmiah Matematika Enthusiastic : International Journal of Applied Statistics and Data Science RENATA Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Kita Semua Indonesian Journal of Applied Mathematics Parameter: Jurnal Matematika, Statistika dan Terapannya TeknoKreatif: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Indonesian Actuarial Journal
Indah Gumala Andirasdini
Department Of Actuarial Science, Institut Teknologi Sumatera, 35365. Indonesia
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Astronomy Chemistry Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Physics Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Comparative Modeling of Pineapple Production Using Gaussian GLM and Random Forest Regression Radot MH Siahaan; Indah Gumala Andirasdini; Fuji Lestari; Dwi Mahrani; Amalia Listiani
ZERO: Jurnal Sains, Matematika dan Terapan Vol 10, No 1 (2026): Zero: Jurnal Sains Matematika dan Terapan
Publisher : UIN Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30829/zero.v10i1.28721

Abstract

This study aims to conduct a comparative modelling of pineapple production at PT Great Giant Pineapple (GGP) using Gaussian GLM as parametric statistical approach and Random Forest Regression method as machine learning based on monthly data from 2014 to 2022. Multicollinearity testing and distribution fitting were conducted to validate the Gaussian assumption. For the Random Forest Regression, hyperparameters were optimized by tuning the number of trees (ntree) and the number of predictors at each split (mtry) with model stability evaluated using Out-of-Bag (OOB) error. The Gaussian GLM achieved a MAPE of 8.41% (R² = 0.106) for the GP3 clone and 11.27% (R² = 0.149) for the F180 clone. Random Forest Regression produced a testing MAPE of 9.28% (R² = 0.144) for GP3 and 12.11% (R² = 0.105) for F180. While both models achieved low prediction error based on MAPE, they differed in identifying influential variables and showed limited explanatory power as indicated by low R² values. The Gaussian GLM identifies air pressure as significant for both clones and rainfall for F180 clone, while Random Forest consistently identifies rainfall as the most influential predictor. These findings confirm the complementary strengths of parametric and machine learning approaches in supporting climate-based production planning and risk mitigation.
Co-Authors Aliem, Dien Manarul Amalia Listiani Ayu Sofia Azzanina, Nanda Baiti, Putri Isnaini Cahyaning Berliana Ratam, Aldila Nur Indah Dewi, Karina Sylfia Dila Tirta Julianty Dwi Mahrani Dwi Mahrani Fuji Lestari Fuji Lestari Fuji Lestari Gustina K. S, Annisa Hevita Irwan, Sri Efrinita Josepa , Tiffany Audrey Listiani, Amalia Marisa . Paiz Jalaludin Radot MH Siahaan Rahman, Alrafiful Ratih Suryaningsih Rivai, Muklas Rosni, Rosni Saputra, Desta Septia Eka Marsha Putra Simarmata, Gabriel Camoranesa Yulita, Tiara