Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : jurnal representamen

Indonesian Criminal Code Draft (RKUHP) Objectivity on Tirto.id Amal, Muhammad Ihlasul; Mursalim, Mursalim; Karnay, Sudirman
representamen Vol 10 No 02 (2024): Jurnal Representamen Volume 10 No 02 Oktober 2024
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/representamen.v10i02.10617

Abstract

This research aims to determine the tendency of Tirto.id as one of the cyber media to present news on the Indonesian Criminal Code Draft (RKUHP). This research uses Westerståhl’s objectivity framework to measure Tirto’s objectivity in presenting coverage of the RKUHP. Westerståhl divides objectivity into two large dimensions, namely factuality and impartiality. The factuality dimension consists of aspects of truth and relevance, while the impartiality dimension consists of balance/non-partisanship aspects. The primary data for this research is news published by Tirto.id which discusses the RKUHP in the period May-September 2019 with a total of 118 news. News is searched using the keyword “RKUHP 2019”. The news was documented and samples were drawn using total sampling, so that the population is the sample for this research. The news was then analyzed using the content analysis method. This research shows that Tirto.id generally tends to report on the RKUHP objectively. Tirto.id fulfills the aspects of truth, relevance and neutrality with a very high percentage of all criteria in each of these aspects. Meanwhile, the balance aspect tends not to be fulfilled by Tirto.id in terms of equal or proportional access criteria. However, Tirto.id tends to present news from various sides of reporting (positive, negative and neutral) which are contained in two-sided criteria (even handed) in a balanced aspect. Keywords: objectivity, news, RKUHP, Tirto.id, Westerståhl
Narrative Shift in Social Media News Reporting: A Case Study of Ferdy Sambo on Instagram Amal, Muhammad Ihlasul; Mau, Muliadi; Sonni, Alem Febri
representamen Vol. 12 No. 01 (2026): Jurnal Representamen Volume 12 No. 01 April 2026
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/representamen.v12i01.133234

Abstract

The Ferdy Sambo case developed into a major institutional crisis in Indonesia, marked by inconsistent official statements, shifting chronologies, and growing public distrust toward the police. In the digital media environment, this crisis unfolded not only through the disclosure of new facts but also through ongoing transformations in narratives circulating within the online public sphere. This study examines how narrative shifts occurred in Instagram news coverage of the case by @narasinewsroom and analyzes the role of digital framing in shaping meaning during a legitimacy crisis. While previous framing studies tend to capture media representation at a single moment, this research highlights the temporal dynamics of narrative construction in social media-driven communication. It also emphasizes multimodal framing, integrating verbal, visual, and vocal elements, alongside the active role of audiences as prosumers in negotiating meaning. Using an interpretive qualitative approach, this study applies Gamson and Modigliani’s framing model combined with temporal narrative mapping. Nineteen posts were purposively selected from 182 Instagram uploads published between July 2022 and February 2023 to identify key narrative turning points. The findings reveal five phases of narrative shift: construction, disruption, exposure, escalation, and closure. The transition from the initial “shootout” narrative to the “murder plot” narrative indicates the erosion of institutional narrative authority. Multimodal framing devices and prosumer interactions play a crucial role in delegitimizing inconsistent official accounts and reinforcing alternative interpretations aligned with emerging evidence. This study demonstrates that narrative shift functions as an analytical indicator of institutional legitimacy crisis in digitally mediated communication and underscores the importance of coherent and transparent crisis communication in maintaining public trust in the digital era.